关于非线性最小二乘算法比较的说明

Zafar Khan, Sudhir Chawla, Dinesh Dave
{"title":"关于非线性最小二乘算法比较的说明","authors":"Zafar Khan, Sudhir Chawla, Dinesh Dave","doi":"10.1145/101070.101075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nonlinear least squares problem is a special case of the unconstrained minimization problem. While a large number of new algorithms have been developed in recent years, both for general unconstrained minimization and the least squares case, comparative studies are limited. Further, there has been practically a revolution in algorithm testing and comparison methodology. Recent advances include a more comprehensive performance criteria, use of large numbers of randomly generated test problems, and application of sophisticated statistical techniques for experiment design and data evaluation.These developments have made questionable the findings of the few earlier comparative studies of least squares algorithms. This creates a necessity of a comparative study employing current methodology that evaluates the specialized least squares algorithms along with a few general algorithms for unconstrained minimization.","PeriodicalId":177516,"journal":{"name":"ACM Signum Newsletter","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A note on comparison of nonlinear least squares algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Zafar Khan, Sudhir Chawla, Dinesh Dave\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/101070.101075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The nonlinear least squares problem is a special case of the unconstrained minimization problem. While a large number of new algorithms have been developed in recent years, both for general unconstrained minimization and the least squares case, comparative studies are limited. Further, there has been practically a revolution in algorithm testing and comparison methodology. Recent advances include a more comprehensive performance criteria, use of large numbers of randomly generated test problems, and application of sophisticated statistical techniques for experiment design and data evaluation.These developments have made questionable the findings of the few earlier comparative studies of least squares algorithms. This creates a necessity of a comparative study employing current methodology that evaluates the specialized least squares algorithms along with a few general algorithms for unconstrained minimization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/101070.101075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Signum Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/101070.101075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

非线性最小二乘问题是无约束最小化问题的一种特殊情况。虽然近年来出现了大量的新算法,但无论是一般无约束最小化算法还是最小二乘算法,比较研究都很有限。此外,在算法测试和比较方法方面实际上已经发生了一场革命。最近的进展包括更全面的性能标准,使用大量随机生成的测试问题,以及在实验设计和数据评估中应用复杂的统计技术。这些发展使得早期对最小二乘算法的少数比较研究的结果受到质疑。这就产生了采用当前方法进行比较研究的必要性,该方法评估了专门的最小二乘算法以及一些用于无约束最小化的一般算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A note on comparison of nonlinear least squares algorithms
The nonlinear least squares problem is a special case of the unconstrained minimization problem. While a large number of new algorithms have been developed in recent years, both for general unconstrained minimization and the least squares case, comparative studies are limited. Further, there has been practically a revolution in algorithm testing and comparison methodology. Recent advances include a more comprehensive performance criteria, use of large numbers of randomly generated test problems, and application of sophisticated statistical techniques for experiment design and data evaluation.These developments have made questionable the findings of the few earlier comparative studies of least squares algorithms. This creates a necessity of a comparative study employing current methodology that evaluates the specialized least squares algorithms along with a few general algorithms for unconstrained minimization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信