论奇布羌语中否定标记语wã的起源

Sara Pacchiarotti
{"title":"论奇布羌语中否定标记语wã的起源","authors":"Sara Pacchiarotti","doi":"10.1163/9789004392007_007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bribri and Cabécar are Chibchan languages spoken in Costa Rica in contiguous territories.1 Both languages display two distinct ergative markers, diachronically unrelated in any obvious way. The canonical, standard ergative marker is tö in Bribri (1) and të in Cabécar (2). A further ergative marker wã seems to be construction-determined and is more restricted in terms of usage. It is found, among others, in the perfect construction, cf. (3) and (4).","PeriodicalId":303494,"journal":{"name":"Reconstructing Syntax","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Origins of the Ergative Marker wã in the Viceitic Languages of the Chibchan Family\",\"authors\":\"Sara Pacchiarotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004392007_007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bribri and Cabécar are Chibchan languages spoken in Costa Rica in contiguous territories.1 Both languages display two distinct ergative markers, diachronically unrelated in any obvious way. The canonical, standard ergative marker is tö in Bribri (1) and të in Cabécar (2). A further ergative marker wã seems to be construction-determined and is more restricted in terms of usage. It is found, among others, in the perfect construction, cf. (3) and (4).\",\"PeriodicalId\":303494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reconstructing Syntax\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reconstructing Syntax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392007_007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconstructing Syntax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392007_007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

布里布里语和卡布卡桑卡语是哥斯达黎加邻近地区使用的奇布坎语两种语言都表现出两种截然不同的否定标记,它们在历时上没有明显的关联。规范的、标准的否定标记是Bribri(1)中的tö和cab(2)中的të。另一个否定标记wã似乎是由结构决定的,在使用方面更受限制。它可以在完成式结构中找到,参见(3)和(4)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Origins of the Ergative Marker wã in the Viceitic Languages of the Chibchan Family
Bribri and Cabécar are Chibchan languages spoken in Costa Rica in contiguous territories.1 Both languages display two distinct ergative markers, diachronically unrelated in any obvious way. The canonical, standard ergative marker is tö in Bribri (1) and të in Cabécar (2). A further ergative marker wã seems to be construction-determined and is more restricted in terms of usage. It is found, among others, in the perfect construction, cf. (3) and (4).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信