初中数学课程:现代与传统观点的平衡

L. Cătană
{"title":"初中数学课程:现代与传统观点的平衡","authors":"L. Cătană","doi":"10.26755/revped/2018.2/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After new math curriculum for the middle school (5 – 8 grades) came into force, in 2017, it was found that significant differences between the formal curriculum, STUDII TEORETICE Revista de Pedagogie Journal of Pedagogy, 2018 (2), 7 – 24 https://doi.org/10.26755/RevPed/2018.2/7 * Cercetător ştiinţific dr., Institutul de Ştiinţe ale Educaţiei, Bucureşti, România. thought by school curriculum designers, and the curriculum interpreted by teachers and applied in class, may appear, even when teachers have participated in curricular training courses. These differences can be determined by factors such as teaching habits, class level, manual used, or even the national exams at the end of the 8 grade. Starting from the general idea that it is necessary for teachers to decode correctly and to accept the new vision of constructing mathematical knowledge using the curriculum, this paper details the new aspects of the middle school mathematics. Their presentation is reported for each section of the program, insisting on the differences from the previous version. The article could be useful to providers of didactic training programs for middle school mathematics teachers, as well as to teachers who wish to design and develop various didactic resources for mathematics, in accordance to the new curriculum.","PeriodicalId":231080,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Pedagogie - Journal of Pedagogy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM FOR LOW SECONDARY EDUCATION: BALANCING BETWEEN MODERN AND TRADITIONAL PERSPECTIVES\",\"authors\":\"L. Cătană\",\"doi\":\"10.26755/revped/2018.2/7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After new math curriculum for the middle school (5 – 8 grades) came into force, in 2017, it was found that significant differences between the formal curriculum, STUDII TEORETICE Revista de Pedagogie Journal of Pedagogy, 2018 (2), 7 – 24 https://doi.org/10.26755/RevPed/2018.2/7 * Cercetător ştiinţific dr., Institutul de Ştiinţe ale Educaţiei, Bucureşti, România. thought by school curriculum designers, and the curriculum interpreted by teachers and applied in class, may appear, even when teachers have participated in curricular training courses. These differences can be determined by factors such as teaching habits, class level, manual used, or even the national exams at the end of the 8 grade. Starting from the general idea that it is necessary for teachers to decode correctly and to accept the new vision of constructing mathematical knowledge using the curriculum, this paper details the new aspects of the middle school mathematics. Their presentation is reported for each section of the program, insisting on the differences from the previous version. The article could be useful to providers of didactic training programs for middle school mathematics teachers, as well as to teachers who wish to design and develop various didactic resources for mathematics, in accordance to the new curriculum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Pedagogie - Journal of Pedagogy\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Pedagogie - Journal of Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26755/revped/2018.2/7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Pedagogie - Journal of Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26755/revped/2018.2/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年,中学数学新课程(5 - 8年级)实施后,发现与正式课程之间存在显著差异,STUDII TEORETICE教育学杂志,2018 (2),7 - 24 https://doi.org/10.26755/RevPed/2018.2/7 * cercet博士,Ştiinţe ale研究所Educaţiei, bucure, romnia。即使教师参加过课程培训课程,也可能出现学校课程设计者的思想,以及教师对课程的解读和课堂应用。这些差异可以由教学习惯,课堂水平,手册使用,甚至是8年级末的国家考试等因素决定。本文从教师必须正确解读和接受利用课程构建数学知识的新视野出发,详细介绍了中学数学的新方面。他们的演示报告了程序的每个部分,坚持与以前版本的不同之处。本文可以为中学数学教师教学培训的提供者,以及希望根据新课程设计和开发各种数学教学资源的教师提供有益的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM FOR LOW SECONDARY EDUCATION: BALANCING BETWEEN MODERN AND TRADITIONAL PERSPECTIVES
After new math curriculum for the middle school (5 – 8 grades) came into force, in 2017, it was found that significant differences between the formal curriculum, STUDII TEORETICE Revista de Pedagogie Journal of Pedagogy, 2018 (2), 7 – 24 https://doi.org/10.26755/RevPed/2018.2/7 * Cercetător ştiinţific dr., Institutul de Ştiinţe ale Educaţiei, Bucureşti, România. thought by school curriculum designers, and the curriculum interpreted by teachers and applied in class, may appear, even when teachers have participated in curricular training courses. These differences can be determined by factors such as teaching habits, class level, manual used, or even the national exams at the end of the 8 grade. Starting from the general idea that it is necessary for teachers to decode correctly and to accept the new vision of constructing mathematical knowledge using the curriculum, this paper details the new aspects of the middle school mathematics. Their presentation is reported for each section of the program, insisting on the differences from the previous version. The article could be useful to providers of didactic training programs for middle school mathematics teachers, as well as to teachers who wish to design and develop various didactic resources for mathematics, in accordance to the new curriculum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信