法律服务采购策略:保加利亚百强非金融企业部门研究

Anton Petrov
{"title":"法律服务采购策略:保加利亚百强非金融企业部门研究","authors":"Anton Petrov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3222180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the background of an evolving legal market there is a debate in both theory and practice about the role of in-house general counsels (GCs). This paper aims to contribute to the discussion by studying the organization of legal departments in large Bulgarian non-financial corporations and their modes of collaboration with external providers of legal services. The research seeks to establish how Bulgarian GCs take decisions about ‘making’ or ‘buying’ legal services, to examine the factors that determine the strategic choice of sourcing and collaboration and to provide a framework for its analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GCs selected by convenience in terms of accessibility from the ‘K100’ ranking of the Bulgarian business weekly ‘Capital’ (2017 version). The panel comprises 14 respondents but due to presence of interrelations and shared service centres the sample covers over 20 companies. The analysis shows that ‘making’ is preferred over ‘buying’ when it concerns ‘blended advice’ requiring both legal knowledge and organization specific business knowledge. Market dynamics affect the strategy choice and variations in the supplier portfolio design result from the pursuit of two contradicting goals: reduced cost and increased security. Bargaining-based contracting allows better cost management but also isolates the supplier. Close collaboration and investment in relationship development mitigate uncertainty concerns permitting closer integration between legal departments and law firms. A simplified decisional matrix is proposed distinguishing between 4 generic strategies: ‘Open portfolio’, ‘Preferred supplier’, and two ‘Closed panel’ variations – with and without competition.","PeriodicalId":330356,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Sourcing of Legal Services: Sector Study of Bulgarian Top 100 Non-Financial Corporations\",\"authors\":\"Anton Petrov\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3222180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the background of an evolving legal market there is a debate in both theory and practice about the role of in-house general counsels (GCs). This paper aims to contribute to the discussion by studying the organization of legal departments in large Bulgarian non-financial corporations and their modes of collaboration with external providers of legal services. The research seeks to establish how Bulgarian GCs take decisions about ‘making’ or ‘buying’ legal services, to examine the factors that determine the strategic choice of sourcing and collaboration and to provide a framework for its analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GCs selected by convenience in terms of accessibility from the ‘K100’ ranking of the Bulgarian business weekly ‘Capital’ (2017 version). The panel comprises 14 respondents but due to presence of interrelations and shared service centres the sample covers over 20 companies. The analysis shows that ‘making’ is preferred over ‘buying’ when it concerns ‘blended advice’ requiring both legal knowledge and organization specific business knowledge. Market dynamics affect the strategy choice and variations in the supplier portfolio design result from the pursuit of two contradicting goals: reduced cost and increased security. Bargaining-based contracting allows better cost management but also isolates the supplier. Close collaboration and investment in relationship development mitigate uncertainty concerns permitting closer integration between legal departments and law firms. A simplified decisional matrix is proposed distinguishing between 4 generic strategies: ‘Open portfolio’, ‘Preferred supplier’, and two ‘Closed panel’ variations – with and without competition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3222180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3222180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法律市场不断发展的背景下,关于内部总法律顾问(GCs)的作用在理论和实践中都存在争议。本文旨在通过研究保加利亚大型非金融公司法律部门的组织及其与外部法律服务提供者的合作模式来促进讨论。该研究旨在确定保加利亚法律顾问如何做出“制定”或“购买”法律服务的决定,以检查决定采购和合作战略选择的因素,并为其分析提供框架。采用半结构化访谈,从保加利亚商业周刊《资本》(2017年版)的“K100”排名中,根据可及性的便利性选择gc。该小组由14名受访者组成,但由于存在相互关系和共享服务中心,样本涵盖了20多家公司。分析表明,当涉及需要法律知识和组织特定业务知识的“混合建议”时,“制造”比“购买”更受欢迎。市场动态影响着供应商的策略选择,而供应商组合设计的变化源于对降低成本和提高安全性这两个相互矛盾的目标的追求。以议价为基础的合同允许更好的成本管理,但也使供应商孤立。在关系发展方面的密切合作和投资减轻了不确定性的担忧,使法律部门和律师事务所之间的整合更加紧密。提出了一个简化的决策矩阵来区分4种通用策略:“开放式投资组合”、“首选供应商”和两种“封闭面板”变体——有竞争和没有竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for Sourcing of Legal Services: Sector Study of Bulgarian Top 100 Non-Financial Corporations
On the background of an evolving legal market there is a debate in both theory and practice about the role of in-house general counsels (GCs). This paper aims to contribute to the discussion by studying the organization of legal departments in large Bulgarian non-financial corporations and their modes of collaboration with external providers of legal services. The research seeks to establish how Bulgarian GCs take decisions about ‘making’ or ‘buying’ legal services, to examine the factors that determine the strategic choice of sourcing and collaboration and to provide a framework for its analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GCs selected by convenience in terms of accessibility from the ‘K100’ ranking of the Bulgarian business weekly ‘Capital’ (2017 version). The panel comprises 14 respondents but due to presence of interrelations and shared service centres the sample covers over 20 companies. The analysis shows that ‘making’ is preferred over ‘buying’ when it concerns ‘blended advice’ requiring both legal knowledge and organization specific business knowledge. Market dynamics affect the strategy choice and variations in the supplier portfolio design result from the pursuit of two contradicting goals: reduced cost and increased security. Bargaining-based contracting allows better cost management but also isolates the supplier. Close collaboration and investment in relationship development mitigate uncertainty concerns permitting closer integration between legal departments and law firms. A simplified decisional matrix is proposed distinguishing between 4 generic strategies: ‘Open portfolio’, ‘Preferred supplier’, and two ‘Closed panel’ variations – with and without competition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信