哲学范式的错误纠缠着学生研究与科学艺术教育的发展

A. Pradoko
{"title":"哲学范式的错误纠缠着学生研究与科学艺术教育的发展","authors":"A. Pradoko","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200703.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scientific paradigm developed from the era of mythic society around before the 15th century and then stepped on modern society in the early 17th century. In this modern era the rapid development of science with the paradigm of logical empiricism, realistic observation through the senses and the laboratory and precise calculations. In this era the industrial world, technology and technology are growing rapidly. In the social world sociology emerged with the character Auguste Comte. The world of education also follows the tradition of modern thought with the positivistic thought of Comte. The era of philosophical thought has developed again, weaknesses in the modern era are criticized with the emergence of postmodern philosophical thoughts. In this paper describes the misuse of the paradigm so that the positivistic paradigm is applied to the world of cultural meaning. Formatting guidelines for writing research thesis, inappropriate thesis or dissertation presented in this paper are: (a) identification of objects to be studied, (b) research questions in chapter II (c) priority judgment (d) data description format and discussion in chapter four. Glossary of terms: research subjects, research instruments, expert validity and the emergence of the term respondent in qualitative research.","PeriodicalId":143160,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Arts and Arts Education (ICAAE 2019)","volume":"105 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Philosophical Paradigms Errors Entangled the Development of Student Research and Scientific Arts Education\",\"authors\":\"A. Pradoko\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.200703.064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scientific paradigm developed from the era of mythic society around before the 15th century and then stepped on modern society in the early 17th century. In this modern era the rapid development of science with the paradigm of logical empiricism, realistic observation through the senses and the laboratory and precise calculations. In this era the industrial world, technology and technology are growing rapidly. In the social world sociology emerged with the character Auguste Comte. The world of education also follows the tradition of modern thought with the positivistic thought of Comte. The era of philosophical thought has developed again, weaknesses in the modern era are criticized with the emergence of postmodern philosophical thoughts. In this paper describes the misuse of the paradigm so that the positivistic paradigm is applied to the world of cultural meaning. Formatting guidelines for writing research thesis, inappropriate thesis or dissertation presented in this paper are: (a) identification of objects to be studied, (b) research questions in chapter II (c) priority judgment (d) data description format and discussion in chapter four. Glossary of terms: research subjects, research instruments, expert validity and the emergence of the term respondent in qualitative research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Arts and Arts Education (ICAAE 2019)\",\"volume\":\"105 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Arts and Arts Education (ICAAE 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200703.064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Arts and Arts Education (ICAAE 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200703.064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

科学范式从大约15世纪前的神话社会时代发展起来,然后在17世纪初步入现代社会。在这个现代科学飞速发展的时代,逻辑经验主义的范式,通过感官和实验室的现实观察和精确的计算。在这个工业世界的时代,科技和技术正在迅速发展。在社会学界,社会学是随着奥古斯特·孔德这个人物而出现的。教育界也继承了孔德实证主义思想的现代思想传统。哲学思想的时代重新发展起来,后现代哲学思想的出现批判了现代哲学思想的弱点。本文阐述了实证主义范式的误用,以便将实证主义范式应用于文化意义世界。撰写研究论文、不合适的论文或本文提出的论文的格式指南是:(a)研究对象的确定,(b)第二章的研究问题,(c)优先判断,(d)第四章的数据描述格式和讨论。术语表:研究对象、研究工具、专家效度和定性研究中“被调查者”一词的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Philosophical Paradigms Errors Entangled the Development of Student Research and Scientific Arts Education
The scientific paradigm developed from the era of mythic society around before the 15th century and then stepped on modern society in the early 17th century. In this modern era the rapid development of science with the paradigm of logical empiricism, realistic observation through the senses and the laboratory and precise calculations. In this era the industrial world, technology and technology are growing rapidly. In the social world sociology emerged with the character Auguste Comte. The world of education also follows the tradition of modern thought with the positivistic thought of Comte. The era of philosophical thought has developed again, weaknesses in the modern era are criticized with the emergence of postmodern philosophical thoughts. In this paper describes the misuse of the paradigm so that the positivistic paradigm is applied to the world of cultural meaning. Formatting guidelines for writing research thesis, inappropriate thesis or dissertation presented in this paper are: (a) identification of objects to be studied, (b) research questions in chapter II (c) priority judgment (d) data description format and discussion in chapter four. Glossary of terms: research subjects, research instruments, expert validity and the emergence of the term respondent in qualitative research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信