考虑用于size -specific dose estimates(SSDE)计算的size correction factor

Kazufusa Mizonobe, Yuta Shiraishi, Satoshi Nakano, Chiaki Fukuda, O. Asanuma, Kohei Harada, H. Date
{"title":"考虑用于size -specific dose estimates(SSDE)计算的size correction factor","authors":"Kazufusa Mizonobe, Yuta Shiraishi, Satoshi Nakano, Chiaki Fukuda, O. Asanuma, Kohei Harada, H. Date","doi":"10.6009/JJRT.2016_JSRT_72.9.727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Report No.204 recommends the size-specific dose estimates (SSDE), wherein SSDE=computed tomography dose index-volume (CTDIvol )×size correction factor (SCF), as an index of the CT dose to consider patient thickness. However, the study on SSDE has not been made yet for area detector CT (ADCT) device such as a 320-row CT scanner. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SCF values for ADCT by means of a simulation technique to look into the differences in SCF values due to beam width. In the simulation, to construct the geometry of the Aquilion ONE X-ray CT system (120 kV), the dose ratio and the effective energies were measured in the cone angle and fan angle directions, and these were incorporated into the simulation code, Electron Gamma Shower Ver.5 (EGS5). By changing the thickness of a PMMA phantom from 8 cm to 40 cm, CTDIvol and SCF were determined. The SCF values for the beam widths in conventional and volume scans were calculated. The differences among the SCF values of conventional, volume scans, and AAPM were up to 23.0%. However, when SCF values were normalized in a phantom of 16 cm diameter, the error tended to decrease for the cases of thin body thickness, such as those of children. It was concluded that even if beam width and device are different, the SCF values recommended by AAPM are useful in clinical situations.","PeriodicalId":393304,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Size-specific dose estimates(SSDE)算出のためのsize correction factor の検討\",\"authors\":\"Kazufusa Mizonobe, Yuta Shiraishi, Satoshi Nakano, Chiaki Fukuda, O. Asanuma, Kohei Harada, H. Date\",\"doi\":\"10.6009/JJRT.2016_JSRT_72.9.727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Report No.204 recommends the size-specific dose estimates (SSDE), wherein SSDE=computed tomography dose index-volume (CTDIvol )×size correction factor (SCF), as an index of the CT dose to consider patient thickness. However, the study on SSDE has not been made yet for area detector CT (ADCT) device such as a 320-row CT scanner. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SCF values for ADCT by means of a simulation technique to look into the differences in SCF values due to beam width. In the simulation, to construct the geometry of the Aquilion ONE X-ray CT system (120 kV), the dose ratio and the effective energies were measured in the cone angle and fan angle directions, and these were incorporated into the simulation code, Electron Gamma Shower Ver.5 (EGS5). By changing the thickness of a PMMA phantom from 8 cm to 40 cm, CTDIvol and SCF were determined. The SCF values for the beam widths in conventional and volume scans were calculated. The differences among the SCF values of conventional, volume scans, and AAPM were up to 23.0%. However, when SCF values were normalized in a phantom of 16 cm diameter, the error tended to decrease for the cases of thin body thickness, such as those of children. It was concluded that even if beam width and device are different, the SCF values recommended by AAPM are useful in clinical situations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6009/JJRT.2016_JSRT_72.9.727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/JJRT.2016_JSRT_72.9.727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)第204号报告推荐尺寸特异性剂量估计(SSDE),其中SSDE=计算机断层扫描剂量指数-体积(CTDIvol)×size校正因子(SCF),作为考虑患者厚度的CT剂量指标。然而,对于320排CT扫描仪等区域探测CT (area detector CT, ADCT)设备,目前还没有对SSDE进行研究。本研究的目的是通过模拟技术来评估ADCT的SCF值,以观察由于波束宽度而导致的SCF值的差异。在仿真中,为了构建Aquilion ONE x射线CT系统(120 kV)的几何结构,在锥角和扇角方向上测量了剂量比和有效能量,并将其纳入仿真程序Electron Gamma Shower Ver.5 (EGS5)中。通过将PMMA模体厚度从8 cm改变为40 cm,测定CTDIvol和SCF。计算了常规扫描和体积扫描中光束宽度的SCF值。常规扫描、体积扫描和AAPM扫描的SCF值差异高达23.0%。然而,当SCF值在直径为16厘米的幻体中归一化时,对于身体厚度较薄的情况,如儿童,误差倾向于减小。结论是,即使束宽和装置不同,AAPM推荐的SCF值在临床情况下是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Size-specific dose estimates(SSDE)算出のためのsize correction factor の検討
American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Report No.204 recommends the size-specific dose estimates (SSDE), wherein SSDE=computed tomography dose index-volume (CTDIvol )×size correction factor (SCF), as an index of the CT dose to consider patient thickness. However, the study on SSDE has not been made yet for area detector CT (ADCT) device such as a 320-row CT scanner. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SCF values for ADCT by means of a simulation technique to look into the differences in SCF values due to beam width. In the simulation, to construct the geometry of the Aquilion ONE X-ray CT system (120 kV), the dose ratio and the effective energies were measured in the cone angle and fan angle directions, and these were incorporated into the simulation code, Electron Gamma Shower Ver.5 (EGS5). By changing the thickness of a PMMA phantom from 8 cm to 40 cm, CTDIvol and SCF were determined. The SCF values for the beam widths in conventional and volume scans were calculated. The differences among the SCF values of conventional, volume scans, and AAPM were up to 23.0%. However, when SCF values were normalized in a phantom of 16 cm diameter, the error tended to decrease for the cases of thin body thickness, such as those of children. It was concluded that even if beam width and device are different, the SCF values recommended by AAPM are useful in clinical situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信