改进代码审查与GitHub问题跟踪

Abduljaleel Al-Rubaye, G. Sukthankar
{"title":"改进代码审查与GitHub问题跟踪","authors":"Abduljaleel Al-Rubaye, G. Sukthankar","doi":"10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software quality is an important problem for technology companies, since it substantially impacts the efficiency, usefulness, and maintainability of the final product; hence, code review is a must-do activity for software developers. During the code review process, senior engineers monitor other developers' work to spot possible problems and enforce coding standards. One of the most widely used open-source software platforms, GitHub, attracts millions of developers who use it to store their projects. This study aims to analyze code quality on GitHub from the standpoint of code reviews. We examined the code review process using GitHub's Issues Tracker, which allows team members to evaluate, discuss, and share their opinions on the proposed code before it is approved. Based on our analysis, we present a novel approach for improving the code review process by promoting regularity and community involvement.","PeriodicalId":423113,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Code Review with GitHub Issue Tracking\",\"authors\":\"Abduljaleel Al-Rubaye, G. Sukthankar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software quality is an important problem for technology companies, since it substantially impacts the efficiency, usefulness, and maintainability of the final product; hence, code review is a must-do activity for software developers. During the code review process, senior engineers monitor other developers' work to spot possible problems and enforce coding standards. One of the most widely used open-source software platforms, GitHub, attracts millions of developers who use it to store their projects. This study aims to analyze code quality on GitHub from the standpoint of code reviews. We examined the code review process using GitHub's Issues Tracker, which allows team members to evaluate, discuss, and share their opinions on the proposed code before it is approved. Based on our analysis, we present a novel approach for improving the code review process by promoting regularity and community involvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软件质量对于技术公司来说是一个重要的问题,因为它实质上影响着最终产品的效率、有用性和可维护性;因此,代码审查是软件开发人员必须做的活动。在代码审查过程中,高级工程师监视其他开发人员的工作,以发现可能的问题并执行编码标准。GitHub是使用最广泛的开源软件平台之一,吸引了数百万开发人员使用它来存储他们的项目。本研究旨在从代码审查的角度分析GitHub上的代码质量。我们使用GitHub的问题跟踪器检查了代码审查过程,它允许团队成员在批准之前评估,讨论和分享他们对拟议代码的意见。基于我们的分析,我们提出了一种通过促进规律性和社区参与来改进代码审查过程的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Code Review with GitHub Issue Tracking
Software quality is an important problem for technology companies, since it substantially impacts the efficiency, usefulness, and maintainability of the final product; hence, code review is a must-do activity for software developers. During the code review process, senior engineers monitor other developers' work to spot possible problems and enforce coding standards. One of the most widely used open-source software platforms, GitHub, attracts millions of developers who use it to store their projects. This study aims to analyze code quality on GitHub from the standpoint of code reviews. We examined the code review process using GitHub's Issues Tracker, which allows team members to evaluate, discuss, and share their opinions on the proposed code before it is approved. Based on our analysis, we present a novel approach for improving the code review process by promoting regularity and community involvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信