英国行政法中的溯及力与合法期望

Jaime Phillips Letelier
{"title":"英国行政法中的溯及力与合法期望","authors":"Jaime Phillips Letelier","doi":"10.37417/rpd/vol_7_2023_1259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both the doctrines of non-retroactivity and legitimate expectation find their normative foundation on the idea that legal norms and administrative decisions should be stable and predictable, thus allowing individual planning. This is problematic because the protection of individual planning does not fully explain the prohibiting sense often infused in the non-retroactivity principle and the different degrees in which retroactivity takes place. Also, the extension of this principle to genuine legitimate expectation cases may in unduly and excessive protection to individuals from law or policy changes. Thus, this papers proposes a new normative foundation for the non-retroactivity principle around the idea of finality in order to explain its prohibiting sense and to develop the understanding that retroactivity happens in degrees. Finally, this proposal will allow to make better sense of the legitimate expectation case law and the justification of compensation for damages caused by detrimental reliance.","PeriodicalId":121448,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Derecho Público: Teoría y método","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retroactivity and legitimate expectation in the UK Administrative Law\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Phillips Letelier\",\"doi\":\"10.37417/rpd/vol_7_2023_1259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Both the doctrines of non-retroactivity and legitimate expectation find their normative foundation on the idea that legal norms and administrative decisions should be stable and predictable, thus allowing individual planning. This is problematic because the protection of individual planning does not fully explain the prohibiting sense often infused in the non-retroactivity principle and the different degrees in which retroactivity takes place. Also, the extension of this principle to genuine legitimate expectation cases may in unduly and excessive protection to individuals from law or policy changes. Thus, this papers proposes a new normative foundation for the non-retroactivity principle around the idea of finality in order to explain its prohibiting sense and to develop the understanding that retroactivity happens in degrees. Finally, this proposal will allow to make better sense of the legitimate expectation case law and the justification of compensation for damages caused by detrimental reliance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Derecho Público: Teoría y método\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Derecho Público: Teoría y método\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37417/rpd/vol_7_2023_1259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Derecho Público: Teoría y método","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37417/rpd/vol_7_2023_1259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不溯及既往的理论和合法期望的理论都在法律规范和行政决定应该是稳定和可预测的,从而允许个人计划的观念上找到了它们的规范基础。这是有问题的,因为对个人计划的保护并不能完全解释不溯及力原则中经常包含的禁止意义以及溯及力发生的不同程度。此外,将这一原则扩展到真正合法的期望案件可能会不适当和过度地保护个人免受法律或政策变化的影响。因此,本文围绕终局性的概念为不可溯及性原则提出了一个新的规范基础,以解释其禁止意义,并发展溯及性是分程度发生的认识。最后,这一建议将允许更好地理解合法期望判例法和由有害依赖造成的损害赔偿的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retroactivity and legitimate expectation in the UK Administrative Law
Both the doctrines of non-retroactivity and legitimate expectation find their normative foundation on the idea that legal norms and administrative decisions should be stable and predictable, thus allowing individual planning. This is problematic because the protection of individual planning does not fully explain the prohibiting sense often infused in the non-retroactivity principle and the different degrees in which retroactivity takes place. Also, the extension of this principle to genuine legitimate expectation cases may in unduly and excessive protection to individuals from law or policy changes. Thus, this papers proposes a new normative foundation for the non-retroactivity principle around the idea of finality in order to explain its prohibiting sense and to develop the understanding that retroactivity happens in degrees. Finally, this proposal will allow to make better sense of the legitimate expectation case law and the justification of compensation for damages caused by detrimental reliance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信