战争是一种反极端主义的策略

Leon Skerritt
{"title":"战争是一种反极端主义的策略","authors":"Leon Skerritt","doi":"10.13169/jglobfaul.10.1.0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022, there was global outrage, condemnation, and calls for a stop to the attack. Over six months have passed and there does not seem to be an end to the conflict in sight. Of the many reasons the Russian state has given as the impetus for armed conflict, is the countering of neo-Nazi extremism, radicalization, and political violence. In this commentary piece, it will be contended that military intervention is not an effective strategy to combat extremism and that examples from the history of the dissenting west, particularly from the United Kingdom, France, and the United States, can provide support for this contention. This commentary will neither condone nor condemn either belligerent party to this conflict but appraise the strategies of deploying the military to combat extremists.","PeriodicalId":167633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Faultlines","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"War as a counter-extremism strategy\",\"authors\":\"Leon Skerritt\",\"doi\":\"10.13169/jglobfaul.10.1.0117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022, there was global outrage, condemnation, and calls for a stop to the attack. Over six months have passed and there does not seem to be an end to the conflict in sight. Of the many reasons the Russian state has given as the impetus for armed conflict, is the countering of neo-Nazi extremism, radicalization, and political violence. In this commentary piece, it will be contended that military intervention is not an effective strategy to combat extremism and that examples from the history of the dissenting west, particularly from the United Kingdom, France, and the United States, can provide support for this contention. This commentary will neither condone nor condemn either belligerent party to this conflict but appraise the strategies of deploying the military to combat extremists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Faultlines\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Faultlines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13169/jglobfaul.10.1.0117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Faultlines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/jglobfaul.10.1.0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当俄罗斯在2022年2月24日入侵乌克兰时,全世界都感到愤怒、谴责,并呼吁停止袭击。六个多月过去了,似乎还看不到冲突结束的迹象。在俄罗斯政府提出的推动武装冲突的众多理由中,打击新纳粹极端主义、激进化和政治暴力是其中之一。在这篇评论文章中,我们将论证军事干预并不是对抗极端主义的有效策略,并且从持不同意见的西方国家的历史中,特别是英国、法国和美国的历史中,可以为这一论点提供支持。本评论既不宽恕也不谴责这场冲突的任何交战方,而是评价部署军队打击极端分子的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
War as a counter-extremism strategy
When Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 February 2022, there was global outrage, condemnation, and calls for a stop to the attack. Over six months have passed and there does not seem to be an end to the conflict in sight. Of the many reasons the Russian state has given as the impetus for armed conflict, is the countering of neo-Nazi extremism, radicalization, and political violence. In this commentary piece, it will be contended that military intervention is not an effective strategy to combat extremism and that examples from the history of the dissenting west, particularly from the United Kingdom, France, and the United States, can provide support for this contention. This commentary will neither condone nor condemn either belligerent party to this conflict but appraise the strategies of deploying the military to combat extremists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信