另一个流行

Ewa Nowak, A. Barciszewska, R. Kriaučiūnienė, Agnė Jakavonytė-Akstinienė, Karolina Napiwodzka, P. Mazur, Marina Klimenko, Clara Owen
{"title":"另一个流行","authors":"Ewa Nowak, A. Barciszewska, R. Kriaučiūnienė, Agnė Jakavonytė-Akstinienė, Karolina Napiwodzka, P. Mazur, Marina Klimenko, Clara Owen","doi":"10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.23723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has transgressed biomedical categories. According to Horton, it turned out to be a 'syndrome' that infected virtually all spheres of social life. The pandemic has created toxic social atmosphere highly unfavorable to clinical and clinic-ethical decision making. Constraints and pressures related to micro-, meso-, exo- and macro-environments framing doctors, nurses, and medical students in training were identified. These factors exacerbated moral distress (moral injury) amongst clinicians. In a joint Polish-Lithuanian project (IDUB 2020-2022) we examined predictors of moral distress in pandemic clinical contexts. A survey-based, real-time, correlational and comparative study was conducted in Poland and Lithuania after the first year of pandemic with N=227 participants. Unexpected differences on regular and pandemic-type moral distress levels were found between the two national samples. Polish participants showed significantly higher moral distress levels than their Lithuanian counterparts. The following article discusses these findings and recommends the reinforcement of resilient medical decision making.    \n","PeriodicalId":325276,"journal":{"name":"De Ethica","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Ewa Nowak, A. Barciszewska, R. Kriaučiūnienė, Agnė Jakavonytė-Akstinienė, Karolina Napiwodzka, P. Mazur, Marina Klimenko, Clara Owen\",\"doi\":\"10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.23723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has transgressed biomedical categories. According to Horton, it turned out to be a 'syndrome' that infected virtually all spheres of social life. The pandemic has created toxic social atmosphere highly unfavorable to clinical and clinic-ethical decision making. Constraints and pressures related to micro-, meso-, exo- and macro-environments framing doctors, nurses, and medical students in training were identified. These factors exacerbated moral distress (moral injury) amongst clinicians. In a joint Polish-Lithuanian project (IDUB 2020-2022) we examined predictors of moral distress in pandemic clinical contexts. A survey-based, real-time, correlational and comparative study was conducted in Poland and Lithuania after the first year of pandemic with N=227 participants. Unexpected differences on regular and pandemic-type moral distress levels were found between the two national samples. Polish participants showed significantly higher moral distress levels than their Lithuanian counterparts. The following article discusses these findings and recommends the reinforcement of resilient medical decision making.    \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":325276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Ethica\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Ethica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.23723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Ethica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.23723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

SARS-CoV-2大流行已经超越了生物医学范畴。根据霍顿的说法,这是一种“综合症”,几乎感染了社会生活的所有领域。大流行造成了有害的社会氛围,对临床和临床伦理决策极为不利。确定了与医生、护士和医学生在培训中的微观、中观、外观和宏观环境相关的约束和压力。这些因素加剧了临床医生的道德困扰(道德伤害)。在波兰-立陶宛联合项目(IDUB 2020-2022)中,我们研究了流行病临床背景下道德困境的预测因素。大流行一年后,在波兰和立陶宛进行了一项基于调查的实时、相关和比较研究,共有227名参与者。在两个国家的样本中,发现了常规和流行病类型的道德困扰水平的意外差异。波兰的参与者比立陶宛的参与者表现出更高的道德困扰水平。下面的文章讨论了这些发现,并建议加强弹性医疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Another Pandemic
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has transgressed biomedical categories. According to Horton, it turned out to be a 'syndrome' that infected virtually all spheres of social life. The pandemic has created toxic social atmosphere highly unfavorable to clinical and clinic-ethical decision making. Constraints and pressures related to micro-, meso-, exo- and macro-environments framing doctors, nurses, and medical students in training were identified. These factors exacerbated moral distress (moral injury) amongst clinicians. In a joint Polish-Lithuanian project (IDUB 2020-2022) we examined predictors of moral distress in pandemic clinical contexts. A survey-based, real-time, correlational and comparative study was conducted in Poland and Lithuania after the first year of pandemic with N=227 participants. Unexpected differences on regular and pandemic-type moral distress levels were found between the two national samples. Polish participants showed significantly higher moral distress levels than their Lithuanian counterparts. The following article discusses these findings and recommends the reinforcement of resilient medical decision making.   
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信