原原告死亡时被告作为原告的换位:分析

Shivam Goel
{"title":"原原告死亡时被告作为原告的换位:分析","authors":"Shivam Goel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3371403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is settled law that the object of Rule 10 of Order I of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC) is essentially to bring on record all the persons who are parties to the dispute relating to the subject-matter of the suit so that the dispute may be determined in their presence and the multiplicity of proceedings could be avoided. [R. Dhanasundari V/s A.N. Umakanth &amp; Ors, 2019 SCC Online SC 331].<br><br>In the matter of: Anil Kumar Singh V/s Shivnath Mishra, (1995) 3 SCC 147, it was held that, the object of Rule 10 of Order I of the CPC is to bring on record all the persons who are parties to the dispute relating to the subject-matter so that the dispute may be determined in their presence at the same time without any protraction, inconvenience and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.","PeriodicalId":113747,"journal":{"name":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transposition of Defendant As Plaintiff When the Original Plaintiff Dies: Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shivam Goel\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3371403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is settled law that the object of Rule 10 of Order I of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC) is essentially to bring on record all the persons who are parties to the dispute relating to the subject-matter of the suit so that the dispute may be determined in their presence and the multiplicity of proceedings could be avoided. [R. Dhanasundari V/s A.N. Umakanth &amp; Ors, 2019 SCC Online SC 331].<br><br>In the matter of: Anil Kumar Singh V/s Shivnath Mishra, (1995) 3 SCC 147, it was held that, the object of Rule 10 of Order I of the CPC is to bring on record all the persons who are parties to the dispute relating to the subject-matter so that the dispute may be determined in their presence at the same time without any protraction, inconvenience and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Litigation & Procedure eJournal\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Litigation & Procedure eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3371403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3371403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已确定的法律是,1908年《民事诉讼法》(以下简称《民事诉讼法》)命令第1条第10条的目的基本上是将与诉讼标的有关的争端各方的所有人记录在案,以便在他们面前确定争端,避免诉讼的多重性。(R。Dhanasundari V/s A.N. Umakanth &[j].科学通报,2016,(5):629 - 629。在Anil Kumar Singh V/s Shivnath Mishra (1995) 3 SCC 147案中,法院认为,CPC命令第1条第10条的目的是将与主题事项有关的争端各方的所有人记录在案,以便争端可以在他们在场的情况下同时确定,而不会造成任何拖延和不便,并避免重复诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transposition of Defendant As Plaintiff When the Original Plaintiff Dies: Analysis
It is settled law that the object of Rule 10 of Order I of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC) is essentially to bring on record all the persons who are parties to the dispute relating to the subject-matter of the suit so that the dispute may be determined in their presence and the multiplicity of proceedings could be avoided. [R. Dhanasundari V/s A.N. Umakanth & Ors, 2019 SCC Online SC 331].

In the matter of: Anil Kumar Singh V/s Shivnath Mishra, (1995) 3 SCC 147, it was held that, the object of Rule 10 of Order I of the CPC is to bring on record all the persons who are parties to the dispute relating to the subject-matter so that the dispute may be determined in their presence at the same time without any protraction, inconvenience and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信