D. Forster
{"title":"Wahrheit in Wittgensteins Spätphilosophie","authors":"D. Forster","doi":"10.1515/witt-2023-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Truth in Wittgenstein′s Later Philosophy. In this paper I attempt to examine Wittgenstein′s understanding of truth in his later period. In doing so, I orient myself primarily on the remarks published as Philosophical Investigations and On Certainty. My primary aim in the destructive part is to show that his later philosophy neither espouses a redundancy and deflationary, nor an epistemic and anti-realist conception of truth. Both strands of interpretation are strongly represented in the debate. An examination of Wittgenstein’s remarks on the correspondence theory of truth will also shed some light on his thoughts about truth. Furthermore, in the preceding constructive part of this paper, I will try to demonstrate that (1) for Wittgenstein there is a strong link between truths that we accept based on our certainties and our use of the term “truth” and (2) that skepticism about truth, which claims that all accepted truths in our Weltbild (“world-view”) could be actually false, fails to give any meaning to its use of “truth”. This culminates in Wittgenstein′s insight, that the question of what truth is can only be answered relative to the Weltbild. Therefore, talking about truths that transcend our Weltbild becomes nonsense.","PeriodicalId":141976,"journal":{"name":"Wittgenstein-Studien","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wittgenstein-Studien","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2023-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维特根斯坦后期哲学中的抽象真理。本文试图考察维特根斯坦晚年对真理的理解。在这样做的过程中,我主要是根据《哲学研究》和《论确定性》发表的评论来定位自己。我在破坏性部分的主要目的是表明,他后来的哲学既不支持冗余和紧缩,也不支持认识论和反现实主义的真理概念。这两种解释在辩论中都得到了强烈的体现。对维特根斯坦关于真理的对应论的评论的考察也将有助于揭示他关于真理的思想。此外,在本文之前的建设性部分,我将试图证明:(1)对于维特根斯坦来说,我们基于确定性而接受的真理与我们对“真理”一词的使用之间存在着紧密的联系;(2)对真理的怀疑主义,即声称我们的世界观(“世界观”)中所有被接受的真理实际上都可能是错误的,未能赋予其对“真理”的使用任何意义。这在维特根斯坦的洞察力中达到了顶峰,即真理是什么的问题只能相对于世界来回答。因此,谈论超越我们世界观的真理就变成了无稽之谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wahrheit in Wittgensteins Spätphilosophie
Abstract Truth in Wittgenstein′s Later Philosophy. In this paper I attempt to examine Wittgenstein′s understanding of truth in his later period. In doing so, I orient myself primarily on the remarks published as Philosophical Investigations and On Certainty. My primary aim in the destructive part is to show that his later philosophy neither espouses a redundancy and deflationary, nor an epistemic and anti-realist conception of truth. Both strands of interpretation are strongly represented in the debate. An examination of Wittgenstein’s remarks on the correspondence theory of truth will also shed some light on his thoughts about truth. Furthermore, in the preceding constructive part of this paper, I will try to demonstrate that (1) for Wittgenstein there is a strong link between truths that we accept based on our certainties and our use of the term “truth” and (2) that skepticism about truth, which claims that all accepted truths in our Weltbild (“world-view”) could be actually false, fails to give any meaning to its use of “truth”. This culminates in Wittgenstein′s insight, that the question of what truth is can only be answered relative to the Weltbild. Therefore, talking about truths that transcend our Weltbild becomes nonsense.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信