解释非洲实施国之间跨国项目绩效差异的关键决定因素

Christson Azondekon
{"title":"解释非洲实施国之间跨国项目绩效差异的关键决定因素","authors":"Christson Azondekon","doi":"10.56889/ulml4475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last two decades, there is a significant effort of research in international project management primarily focusing on success factors, but those searches are yet to focus on cross-country projects perspective and moreover to perfectly highlight the root cause of the difference appearing in cross-country' project performance across different settings. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we shed light on the key determinants that explain the difference in cross-country project performance across countries of implementation. Four main categories of critical success factors for international development, that are the matching of the project goal and real needs of the countries (beneficiaries), the context (politic, legal, social-cultural) of implementation, the level of stakeholder engagement in each country, project managers and project teams' competencies and capabilities in Project management in each country, have been hypothesized as explaining the difference of performance in our theoretical model. However, the final model from the structural equation modeling shows that the level of stakeholder engagement in each country explains more the difference in performance observed among countries, even though the influence of the three other categories is not totally null.","PeriodicalId":106417,"journal":{"name":"Value co-creation in the project society","volume":"206 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KEY DETERMINANTS EXPLAINING DIFFERENCE IN CROSS-COUNTRY PROJECTS PERFORMANCES AMONG IMPLEMENTATION COUNTRIES IN AFRICAN CONTEXT\",\"authors\":\"Christson Azondekon\",\"doi\":\"10.56889/ulml4475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last two decades, there is a significant effort of research in international project management primarily focusing on success factors, but those searches are yet to focus on cross-country projects perspective and moreover to perfectly highlight the root cause of the difference appearing in cross-country' project performance across different settings. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we shed light on the key determinants that explain the difference in cross-country project performance across countries of implementation. Four main categories of critical success factors for international development, that are the matching of the project goal and real needs of the countries (beneficiaries), the context (politic, legal, social-cultural) of implementation, the level of stakeholder engagement in each country, project managers and project teams' competencies and capabilities in Project management in each country, have been hypothesized as explaining the difference of performance in our theoretical model. However, the final model from the structural equation modeling shows that the level of stakeholder engagement in each country explains more the difference in performance observed among countries, even though the influence of the three other categories is not totally null.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value co-creation in the project society\",\"volume\":\"206 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value co-creation in the project society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56889/ulml4475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value co-creation in the project society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56889/ulml4475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年中,国际项目管理方面的研究有很大的努力,主要集中在成功因素上,但这些研究尚未集中在跨国项目的角度上,更没有完美地突出跨国项目绩效在不同环境下出现差异的根本原因。利用结构方程模型(SEM),我们揭示了解释实施国之间跨国项目绩效差异的关键决定因素。国际发展的四大类关键成功因素,即项目目标与国家(受益人)的实际需求的匹配,实施的背景(政治、法律、社会文化),每个国家利益相关者的参与水平,项目经理和项目团队在每个国家的项目管理能力和能力,已经被假设为解释我们理论模型中绩效差异的假设。然而,结构方程模型的最后一个模型表明,每个国家的利益相关者参与程度更多地解释了各国之间观察到的绩效差异,尽管其他三个类别的影响并非完全无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KEY DETERMINANTS EXPLAINING DIFFERENCE IN CROSS-COUNTRY PROJECTS PERFORMANCES AMONG IMPLEMENTATION COUNTRIES IN AFRICAN CONTEXT
In the last two decades, there is a significant effort of research in international project management primarily focusing on success factors, but those searches are yet to focus on cross-country projects perspective and moreover to perfectly highlight the root cause of the difference appearing in cross-country' project performance across different settings. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we shed light on the key determinants that explain the difference in cross-country project performance across countries of implementation. Four main categories of critical success factors for international development, that are the matching of the project goal and real needs of the countries (beneficiaries), the context (politic, legal, social-cultural) of implementation, the level of stakeholder engagement in each country, project managers and project teams' competencies and capabilities in Project management in each country, have been hypothesized as explaining the difference of performance in our theoretical model. However, the final model from the structural equation modeling shows that the level of stakeholder engagement in each country explains more the difference in performance observed among countries, even though the influence of the three other categories is not totally null.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信