基于激励的秘密保护制度分析

N. B. Margolin, M. Wright, B. Levine
{"title":"基于激励的秘密保护制度分析","authors":"N. B. Margolin, M. Wright, B. Levine","doi":"10.1145/1029146.1029153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Once electronic content has been released it is very difficult to prevent copies of the content from being widely distributed. Such distribution can cause economic harm to the content's copyright owner and others. Our protocol, SPIES, allows one party to sell a secret to second party and provides an economic incentive for two parties to limit sharing of a secret between themselves. We do not use watermarking or traditional DRM mechanisms. We focus on content which is to be shared between two parties only, which is valuable, and which only needs to be protected for a limited amount of time. Examples include passwords to a subscription service, pre-release of media for review, or content shared but bound by a non disclosure agreement. With SPIES, any possesor of the content can receive a portion of the funds placed in escrow by the two legitimate possesors. We analyze this system and show that the best strategy of the content provider and content consumer to maximize their utility is to use SPIES and not share the content further. We deal successfully with a \"dummy registration\" attack in which multiple false identities are used in an attempt to get a higher payment. We also discuss how to determine the correct escrow amount.","PeriodicalId":124354,"journal":{"name":"ACM Digital Rights Management Workshop","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of an incentives-based secrets protection system\",\"authors\":\"N. B. Margolin, M. Wright, B. Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1029146.1029153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Once electronic content has been released it is very difficult to prevent copies of the content from being widely distributed. Such distribution can cause economic harm to the content's copyright owner and others. Our protocol, SPIES, allows one party to sell a secret to second party and provides an economic incentive for two parties to limit sharing of a secret between themselves. We do not use watermarking or traditional DRM mechanisms. We focus on content which is to be shared between two parties only, which is valuable, and which only needs to be protected for a limited amount of time. Examples include passwords to a subscription service, pre-release of media for review, or content shared but bound by a non disclosure agreement. With SPIES, any possesor of the content can receive a portion of the funds placed in escrow by the two legitimate possesors. We analyze this system and show that the best strategy of the content provider and content consumer to maximize their utility is to use SPIES and not share the content further. We deal successfully with a \\\"dummy registration\\\" attack in which multiple false identities are used in an attempt to get a higher payment. We also discuss how to determine the correct escrow amount.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Digital Rights Management Workshop\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Digital Rights Management Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1029146.1029153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Digital Rights Management Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1029146.1029153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

一旦电子内容被发布,就很难阻止内容的副本被广泛传播。这样的分发会对内容的版权所有者和其他人造成经济损失。我们的协议,SPIES,允许一方向另一方出售秘密,并为双方提供经济激励,以限制他们之间的秘密共享。我们不使用水印或传统的DRM机制。我们专注于只在双方之间共享的内容,这些内容是有价值的,并且只需要在有限的时间内受到保护。示例包括订阅服务的密码、用于审查的媒体的预发布,或受保密协议约束的共享内容。使用SPIES,内容的任何所有者都可以收到由两个合法所有者托管的资金的一部分。通过对该系统的分析,我们发现内容提供者和内容消费者最大化其效用的最佳策略是使用SPIES,而不是进一步共享内容。我们成功地处理了“虚拟注册”攻击,其中使用多个虚假身份试图获得更高的付款。我们还讨论了如何确定正确的托管金额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of an incentives-based secrets protection system
Once electronic content has been released it is very difficult to prevent copies of the content from being widely distributed. Such distribution can cause economic harm to the content's copyright owner and others. Our protocol, SPIES, allows one party to sell a secret to second party and provides an economic incentive for two parties to limit sharing of a secret between themselves. We do not use watermarking or traditional DRM mechanisms. We focus on content which is to be shared between two parties only, which is valuable, and which only needs to be protected for a limited amount of time. Examples include passwords to a subscription service, pre-release of media for review, or content shared but bound by a non disclosure agreement. With SPIES, any possesor of the content can receive a portion of the funds placed in escrow by the two legitimate possesors. We analyze this system and show that the best strategy of the content provider and content consumer to maximize their utility is to use SPIES and not share the content further. We deal successfully with a "dummy registration" attack in which multiple false identities are used in an attempt to get a higher payment. We also discuss how to determine the correct escrow amount.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信