Á. Núñez, Cabeza de Vaca, Loreley El Jaber, Pánfilo de Narváez
{"title":"ALVAR nunez CABEZA DE VACA","authors":"Á. Núñez, Cabeza de Vaca, Loreley El Jaber, Pánfilo de Narváez","doi":"10.7560/702554-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present essay aims to analyze the reading circuits of Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca ́s work, questioning its routes and/or its obstacles. For this, we analyze the material aspect of the book, that is, the taste of the reader along with the author ́s choices and the editorial decisions that lead to the success or the forgetting of a text. Here, we specifically work on the joint edition of Naufragios y Comentarios, published in Valladolid in 1555. The privilege that the first text of this book received over the second one, regarding its edition and reading logic through time, is one of the questions that articulate this essay and that we try to answer. For this, we deal with the problem of legality, politics and writing in this River Plate chronicle, with the purpose of elucidating if the legal mark that this story presents –which responds to the personal context of Cabeza de Vaca and to the imperial context in which the text was publishedis the reason for the lack of attention that has marked its “luck.”","PeriodicalId":445252,"journal":{"name":"Relatos y relaciones de Hispanoamérica colonial","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ALVAR NÚÑEZ CABEZA DE VACA\",\"authors\":\"Á. Núñez, Cabeza de Vaca, Loreley El Jaber, Pánfilo de Narváez\",\"doi\":\"10.7560/702554-015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present essay aims to analyze the reading circuits of Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca ́s work, questioning its routes and/or its obstacles. For this, we analyze the material aspect of the book, that is, the taste of the reader along with the author ́s choices and the editorial decisions that lead to the success or the forgetting of a text. Here, we specifically work on the joint edition of Naufragios y Comentarios, published in Valladolid in 1555. The privilege that the first text of this book received over the second one, regarding its edition and reading logic through time, is one of the questions that articulate this essay and that we try to answer. For this, we deal with the problem of legality, politics and writing in this River Plate chronicle, with the purpose of elucidating if the legal mark that this story presents –which responds to the personal context of Cabeza de Vaca and to the imperial context in which the text was publishedis the reason for the lack of attention that has marked its “luck.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":445252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Relatos y relaciones de Hispanoamérica colonial\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Relatos y relaciones de Hispanoamérica colonial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7560/702554-015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relatos y relaciones de Hispanoamérica colonial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/702554-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在分析Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca作品的阅读回路,质疑其路径和/或障碍。为此,我们分析了书的材料方面,也就是说,读者的品味以及作者的选择和编辑的决定,导致文本的成功或被遗忘。在这里,我们专门研究1555年在巴利亚多利德出版的联合版《Naufragios y commentary》。这本书的第一版比第二版更有优势,关于它的版本和穿越时间的逻辑解读,这是这篇文章的问题之一,也是我们试图回答的问题之一。为此,我们在这部《河床》编年史中处理合法性、政治和写作的问题,目的是阐明这个故事所呈现的法律标志——它回应了卡贝萨·德·瓦卡的个人背景和文本出版的帝国背景——是否是标志着它的“运气”的缺乏关注的原因。
The present essay aims to analyze the reading circuits of Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca ́s work, questioning its routes and/or its obstacles. For this, we analyze the material aspect of the book, that is, the taste of the reader along with the author ́s choices and the editorial decisions that lead to the success or the forgetting of a text. Here, we specifically work on the joint edition of Naufragios y Comentarios, published in Valladolid in 1555. The privilege that the first text of this book received over the second one, regarding its edition and reading logic through time, is one of the questions that articulate this essay and that we try to answer. For this, we deal with the problem of legality, politics and writing in this River Plate chronicle, with the purpose of elucidating if the legal mark that this story presents –which responds to the personal context of Cabeza de Vaca and to the imperial context in which the text was publishedis the reason for the lack of attention that has marked its “luck.”