新闻新闻的认识论理论化

Mats Ekström
{"title":"新闻新闻的认识论理论化","authors":"Mats Ekström","doi":"10.1177/1522637919878731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am grateful for the opportunity to comment on Bødker’s and Eldridge’s innovative and inspiring contribution to the study of epistemology in news journalism. Research in this area has intensified in recent years, in response to general transformations within journalism, as well as the specific challenges related to the circulation of misinformation and fake news in online and social media. In the monograph, Bødker and Eldridge develop a theoretical framework to analyze journalistic practices of inferential reasoning, applied in case studies of news reporting related to Donald Trump. I will comment on what I understand as key conceptual components in the framework they suggest, that is, the conceptualization of journalism as knowledge, inferences, and the discursive and performative practices in journalism. I urge further theorizing these essential aspects of journalistic epistemology. Before I discuss the building blocks of the theoretical framework, I will briefly comment on two trends in journalism that were mentioned as a background of the study. In the introduction, Bødker and Eldridge argue that the discursive legitimization of journalism through various textual elements has become more explicit and more complex “because news presents not only knowledge but knowledge of a specific kind.” They assert that the knowledge produced in contemporary journalism has become more differentiated. I will come back to the concept of knowledge. Meanwhile, I am not entirely convinced about this clear shift. Diversity also characterized the subgenres of news journalism even before today’s transformations of the digital news media landscape. I think that the hypothesis of increased explicitness remains to be verified and explored more systematically. Implicit epistemological premises and unproblematic constructions of factuality largely characterize contemporary news journalism. Moreover, changes in the explicitness of epistemic claims, and transparency and contextualization of journalistic practices, have been noted in historical research on earlier transformations of journalism. Perhaps, we now see a new shift. However, we should be careful not to infer too casually a set of general conclusions based on observations of certain phenomena.","PeriodicalId":147592,"journal":{"name":"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theorizing the Epistemologies of News Journalism\",\"authors\":\"Mats Ekström\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1522637919878731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am grateful for the opportunity to comment on Bødker’s and Eldridge’s innovative and inspiring contribution to the study of epistemology in news journalism. Research in this area has intensified in recent years, in response to general transformations within journalism, as well as the specific challenges related to the circulation of misinformation and fake news in online and social media. In the monograph, Bødker and Eldridge develop a theoretical framework to analyze journalistic practices of inferential reasoning, applied in case studies of news reporting related to Donald Trump. I will comment on what I understand as key conceptual components in the framework they suggest, that is, the conceptualization of journalism as knowledge, inferences, and the discursive and performative practices in journalism. I urge further theorizing these essential aspects of journalistic epistemology. Before I discuss the building blocks of the theoretical framework, I will briefly comment on two trends in journalism that were mentioned as a background of the study. In the introduction, Bødker and Eldridge argue that the discursive legitimization of journalism through various textual elements has become more explicit and more complex “because news presents not only knowledge but knowledge of a specific kind.” They assert that the knowledge produced in contemporary journalism has become more differentiated. I will come back to the concept of knowledge. Meanwhile, I am not entirely convinced about this clear shift. Diversity also characterized the subgenres of news journalism even before today’s transformations of the digital news media landscape. I think that the hypothesis of increased explicitness remains to be verified and explored more systematically. Implicit epistemological premises and unproblematic constructions of factuality largely characterize contemporary news journalism. Moreover, changes in the explicitness of epistemic claims, and transparency and contextualization of journalistic practices, have been noted in historical research on earlier transformations of journalism. Perhaps, we now see a new shift. However, we should be careful not to infer too casually a set of general conclusions based on observations of certain phenomena.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637919878731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637919878731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我很高兴有机会对Bødker和Eldridge对新闻学认识论研究的创新和鼓舞人心的贡献发表评论。近年来,为了应对新闻业的总体转型,以及与在线和社交媒体上的错误信息和假新闻传播有关的具体挑战,这一领域的研究得到了加强。在这本专著中,Bødker和Eldridge开发了一个理论框架来分析新闻实践的推理推理,并应用于与唐纳德·特朗普有关的新闻报道的案例研究。我将在他们提出的框架中评论我所理解的关键概念组成部分,即新闻作为知识,推理以及新闻中的话语和表演实践的概念化。我敦促进一步理论化新闻认识论的这些基本方面。在我讨论理论框架的构建模块之前,我将简要评论作为研究背景的两个新闻趋势。在引言中,Bødker和Eldridge认为,通过各种文本元素的新闻话语合法化已经变得更加明确和复杂,“因为新闻不仅呈现知识,而且呈现特定类型的知识。”他们断言,当代新闻所产生的知识已经变得更加分化。我会回到知识的概念上来。与此同时,我并不完全相信这种明显的转变。甚至在今天的数字新闻媒体格局转型之前,多样性也是新闻新闻的子类型的特征。我认为,增加明确性的假设仍有待更系统地验证和探索。含蓄的认识论前提和无问题的事实建构在很大程度上是当代新闻报道的特征。此外,在早期新闻转型的历史研究中,已经注意到认识论主张的明确性以及新闻实践的透明度和语境化的变化。也许,我们现在看到了一个新的转变。然而,我们应该小心,不要根据对某些现象的观察,过于随意地推断出一组一般性结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theorizing the Epistemologies of News Journalism
I am grateful for the opportunity to comment on Bødker’s and Eldridge’s innovative and inspiring contribution to the study of epistemology in news journalism. Research in this area has intensified in recent years, in response to general transformations within journalism, as well as the specific challenges related to the circulation of misinformation and fake news in online and social media. In the monograph, Bødker and Eldridge develop a theoretical framework to analyze journalistic practices of inferential reasoning, applied in case studies of news reporting related to Donald Trump. I will comment on what I understand as key conceptual components in the framework they suggest, that is, the conceptualization of journalism as knowledge, inferences, and the discursive and performative practices in journalism. I urge further theorizing these essential aspects of journalistic epistemology. Before I discuss the building blocks of the theoretical framework, I will briefly comment on two trends in journalism that were mentioned as a background of the study. In the introduction, Bødker and Eldridge argue that the discursive legitimization of journalism through various textual elements has become more explicit and more complex “because news presents not only knowledge but knowledge of a specific kind.” They assert that the knowledge produced in contemporary journalism has become more differentiated. I will come back to the concept of knowledge. Meanwhile, I am not entirely convinced about this clear shift. Diversity also characterized the subgenres of news journalism even before today’s transformations of the digital news media landscape. I think that the hypothesis of increased explicitness remains to be verified and explored more systematically. Implicit epistemological premises and unproblematic constructions of factuality largely characterize contemporary news journalism. Moreover, changes in the explicitness of epistemic claims, and transparency and contextualization of journalistic practices, have been noted in historical research on earlier transformations of journalism. Perhaps, we now see a new shift. However, we should be careful not to infer too casually a set of general conclusions based on observations of certain phenomena.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信