实现分类组织数据的最佳合并

D. Thau, S. Bowers, Bertram Ludäscher
{"title":"实现分类组织数据的最佳合并","authors":"D. Thau, S. Bowers, Bertram Ludäscher","doi":"10.1109/ICDEW.2010.5452756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the task of merging datasets that have been organized using different, but aligned taxonomies. We assume such a merge is intended to create a single dataset that unambiguously describes the information in the source datasets using the alignment. We also assume that the merged result should reflect the observations of the datasets as specifically as possible. Typically, there will be no single merge result that is both unambiguous and maximally specific. In this case, a user may be provided with a set of possible merged datasets. If the user requires a single dataset, that dataset loses specificity. Here we examine whether the data exchange setting can provide a way to derive a ¿best-effort¿ merge. We find that the data exchange setting might be a good candidate for providing the merge, but further research is needed.","PeriodicalId":442345,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE 26th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW 2010)","volume":"14 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards best-effort merge of taxonomically organized data\",\"authors\":\"D. Thau, S. Bowers, Bertram Ludäscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDEW.2010.5452756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the task of merging datasets that have been organized using different, but aligned taxonomies. We assume such a merge is intended to create a single dataset that unambiguously describes the information in the source datasets using the alignment. We also assume that the merged result should reflect the observations of the datasets as specifically as possible. Typically, there will be no single merge result that is both unambiguous and maximally specific. In this case, a user may be provided with a set of possible merged datasets. If the user requires a single dataset, that dataset loses specificity. Here we examine whether the data exchange setting can provide a way to derive a ¿best-effort¿ merge. We find that the data exchange setting might be a good candidate for providing the merge, but further research is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE 26th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW 2010)\",\"volume\":\"14 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE 26th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW 2010)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDEW.2010.5452756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE 26th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW 2010)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDEW.2010.5452756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们考虑合并使用不同但一致的分类法组织的数据集的任务。我们假设这样的合并是为了创建一个单一的数据集,该数据集使用对齐来明确地描述源数据集中的信息。我们还假设合并的结果应尽可能具体地反映数据集的观测结果。通常,不会有一个合并结果是明确的和最大程度的特定的。在这种情况下,可能会向用户提供一组可能合并的数据集。如果用户需要单个数据集,则该数据集将失去特异性。在这里,我们检查数据交换设置是否可以提供一种获得“尽力而为”合并的方法。我们发现数据交换设置可能是提供合并的一个很好的候选,但需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards best-effort merge of taxonomically organized data
We consider the task of merging datasets that have been organized using different, but aligned taxonomies. We assume such a merge is intended to create a single dataset that unambiguously describes the information in the source datasets using the alignment. We also assume that the merged result should reflect the observations of the datasets as specifically as possible. Typically, there will be no single merge result that is both unambiguous and maximally specific. In this case, a user may be provided with a set of possible merged datasets. If the user requires a single dataset, that dataset loses specificity. Here we examine whether the data exchange setting can provide a way to derive a ¿best-effort¿ merge. We find that the data exchange setting might be a good candidate for providing the merge, but further research is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信