急性尿潴留指南——值得吗?：

Journal of Integrated Care Pathways Pub Date : 2006-08-01 DOI:10.1258/J.JICP.2006.134

R. Durai, R. Ravi, I. Dickinson

{"title":"急性尿潴留指南——值得吗?：","authors":"R. Durai, R. Ravi, I. Dickinson","doi":"10.1258/J.JICP.2006.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveMany district general hospitals in the UK do not have 24-hour urology cover and the junior doctors admit almost all patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) unnecessarily. A small retrospective audit involving a random selection of 17 patients who initially presented with AUR to accident and emergency (AE three patients were excluded.ResultsAfter implementation of the guideline, the majority of patients went home with a catheter (86%), and the num...","PeriodicalId":332790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care Pathways","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Urinary Retention Guidelines – are they Worth it?:\",\"authors\":\"R. Durai, R. Ravi, I. Dickinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1258/J.JICP.2006.134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveMany district general hospitals in the UK do not have 24-hour urology cover and the junior doctors admit almost all patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) unnecessarily. A small retrospective audit involving a random selection of 17 patients who initially presented with AUR to accident and emergency (AE three patients were excluded.ResultsAfter implementation of the guideline, the majority of patients went home with a catheter (86%), and the num...\",\"PeriodicalId\":332790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrated Care Pathways\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrated Care Pathways\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1258/J.JICP.2006.134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/J.JICP.2006.134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:英国许多地区综合医院没有24小时泌尿科覆盖，初级医生几乎没有必要收治所有急性尿潴留(AUR)患者。一项小型回顾性审计随机选择了17例最初因意外和紧急事件(AE)出现AUR的患者，排除了3例患者。结果实施指南后，大多数患者(86%)带着导尿管回家。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Acute Urinary Retention Guidelines – are they Worth it?:

ObjectiveMany district general hospitals in the UK do not have 24-hour urology cover and the junior doctors admit almost all patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) unnecessarily. A small retrospective audit involving a random selection of 17 patients who initially presented with AUR to accident and emergency (AE three patients were excluded.ResultsAfter implementation of the guideline, the majority of patients went home with a catheter (86%), and the num...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Integrated Care Pathways

自引率

0.00%

发文量