路易斯·瑞尔:非自愿精神病监禁案例研究。

T E Flanagan
{"title":"路易斯·瑞尔:非自愿精神病监禁案例研究。","authors":"T E Flanagan","doi":"10.1177/070674377802300707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Louis Riel was confined against his will in insane asylums from March 6, 1876 to January 23, 1878. Psychiatrists and historians have generally interpreted his certification as an act of benevolence to Riel at a time when he was non compos mentis. However, detailed study of surviving records and manuscript sources shows that the commitment was legally suspect in a number of ways: proper signatures were lacking, pseudonyms were used, records were falsified, and so on. Moreover, while Riel was clearly a religious enthusiast with eccentric ideas, there was no proof that he was dangerous to himself or others at this time. We may thus wish to revise our interpretation of Riel's certification. It was not an act of benevolence but an illegal and unjustifiable deprivation of liberty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9551,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Psychiatric Association journal","volume":"23 7","pages":"463-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/070674377802300707","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Louis Riel: a case study in involuntary psychiatric confinement.\",\"authors\":\"T E Flanagan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/070674377802300707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Louis Riel was confined against his will in insane asylums from March 6, 1876 to January 23, 1878. Psychiatrists and historians have generally interpreted his certification as an act of benevolence to Riel at a time when he was non compos mentis. However, detailed study of surviving records and manuscript sources shows that the commitment was legally suspect in a number of ways: proper signatures were lacking, pseudonyms were used, records were falsified, and so on. Moreover, while Riel was clearly a religious enthusiast with eccentric ideas, there was no proof that he was dangerous to himself or others at this time. We may thus wish to revise our interpretation of Riel's certification. It was not an act of benevolence but an illegal and unjustifiable deprivation of liberty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Psychiatric Association journal\",\"volume\":\"23 7\",\"pages\":\"463-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/070674377802300707\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Psychiatric Association journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/070674377802300707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Psychiatric Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/070674377802300707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从1876年3月6日到1878年1月23日,路易斯·里尔被强行关进精神病院。精神科医生和历史学家通常将他的认证解释为对瑞尔的仁慈之举,当时瑞尔正处于精神错乱状态。然而,对现存记录和手稿来源的详细研究表明,这一承诺在许多方面在法律上都是可疑的:缺乏适当的签名,使用假名,记录被伪造等等。此外,虽然瑞尔显然是一个有着古怪想法的宗教狂热者,但当时没有证据表明他对自己或他人有危险。因此,我们不妨修改我们对里尔证明的解释。这不是一种仁慈的行为,而是对自由的非法和不合理的剥夺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Louis Riel: a case study in involuntary psychiatric confinement.

Louis Riel was confined against his will in insane asylums from March 6, 1876 to January 23, 1878. Psychiatrists and historians have generally interpreted his certification as an act of benevolence to Riel at a time when he was non compos mentis. However, detailed study of surviving records and manuscript sources shows that the commitment was legally suspect in a number of ways: proper signatures were lacking, pseudonyms were used, records were falsified, and so on. Moreover, while Riel was clearly a religious enthusiast with eccentric ideas, there was no proof that he was dangerous to himself or others at this time. We may thus wish to revise our interpretation of Riel's certification. It was not an act of benevolence but an illegal and unjustifiable deprivation of liberty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信