在沿海生境监测中使用无人机系统的后勤和技术考虑:高分辨率水下植被评估的案例研究

Shore & Beach Pub Date : 2020-05-21 DOI:10.34237/1008825
{"title":"在沿海生境监测中使用无人机系统的后勤和技术考虑:高分辨率水下植被评估的案例研究","authors":"","doi":"10.34237/1008825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the technology and regulation surrounding the use of unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) has rapidly advanced. This has resulted in the availability of such technology for more common applications. Here we compare manned versus UAS platforms for acquiring high-resolution imagery of subaquatic habitat for the purpose of boat propeller scar delineation in seagrass meadows in Redfish Bay, Texas. We acquired aerial seagrass imagery in three 20-hectare plots using two UASs and one manned aircraft platform. The three plots represented a priori designations of low, moderate, and high seagrass scarring intensity. Overall, we observed that a smaller amount of scarring was detected in the manned aircraft imagery compared to that collected by the two UAS platforms, and that this disparity was much greater for the high scarring intensity plot. The observed differences in scar feature delineations were at least partially related to logistical difference between these two platforms — specifically, the lower altitude flown by the UASs results in a higher spatial resolution of the imagery that is less dependent on the camera specifications. From a logistical standpoint, the potential gain in spatial resolution via lower altitude flight could result in a reduced pricetag for high-resolution mapped products. Further, the rapid deployment and local operation typically resulting from the accessibility of UAS training greatly simplify the logistics of planning imagery acquisition at the appropriate scale. However, we realize that the current trade-off with regard to higher altitude is the ability to cover large areas with fewer transects and shorter flight time. Coverage limitations for UASs is currently rooted in both technological and legal issues. However, as technology and regulations evolve, the technical and logistical comparison of imagery products from UAS and manned platforms will become increasingly important to natural resource managers and researchers looking to make this transition to UAS.","PeriodicalId":153020,"journal":{"name":"Shore & Beach","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logistical and technical considerations for the use of unmanned aircraft systems in coastal habitat monitoring: A case study in high-resolution subaquatic vegetation assessment\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.34237/1008825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, the technology and regulation surrounding the use of unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) has rapidly advanced. This has resulted in the availability of such technology for more common applications. Here we compare manned versus UAS platforms for acquiring high-resolution imagery of subaquatic habitat for the purpose of boat propeller scar delineation in seagrass meadows in Redfish Bay, Texas. We acquired aerial seagrass imagery in three 20-hectare plots using two UASs and one manned aircraft platform. The three plots represented a priori designations of low, moderate, and high seagrass scarring intensity. Overall, we observed that a smaller amount of scarring was detected in the manned aircraft imagery compared to that collected by the two UAS platforms, and that this disparity was much greater for the high scarring intensity plot. The observed differences in scar feature delineations were at least partially related to logistical difference between these two platforms — specifically, the lower altitude flown by the UASs results in a higher spatial resolution of the imagery that is less dependent on the camera specifications. From a logistical standpoint, the potential gain in spatial resolution via lower altitude flight could result in a reduced pricetag for high-resolution mapped products. Further, the rapid deployment and local operation typically resulting from the accessibility of UAS training greatly simplify the logistics of planning imagery acquisition at the appropriate scale. However, we realize that the current trade-off with regard to higher altitude is the ability to cover large areas with fewer transects and shorter flight time. Coverage limitations for UASs is currently rooted in both technological and legal issues. However, as technology and regulations evolve, the technical and logistical comparison of imagery products from UAS and manned platforms will become increasingly important to natural resource managers and researchers looking to make this transition to UAS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shore & Beach\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shore & Beach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34237/1008825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shore & Beach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34237/1008825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,围绕无人驾驶飞机系统(UASs)使用的技术和法规得到了迅速发展。这使得这种技术可以用于更常见的应用程序。在这里,我们比较了载人和无人机平台,以获取水下栖息地的高分辨率图像,用于在德克萨斯州红鱼湾的海草草地上描绘船螺旋桨疤痕。我们使用两架无人驾驶飞机和一个有人驾驶飞机平台,在三个20公顷的地块上获得海草的空中图像。三个样地分别代表了低、中、高海草疤痕强度的先验标记。总的来说,我们观察到,与两个无人机平台收集的疤痕相比,在有人驾驶飞机图像中检测到的疤痕数量较少,并且这种差异对于高疤痕强度图来说要大得多。观察到的疤痕特征描绘的差异至少部分与这两个平台之间的后勤差异有关——具体来说,无人机飞行的较低高度导致图像的空间分辨率更高,对相机规格的依赖程度更低。从物流的角度来看,通过低空飞行获得空间分辨率的潜在收益可能会降低高分辨率地图产品的价格。此外,由于无人机训练的可及性,快速部署和局部操作通常大大简化了在适当规模上规划图像获取的后勤工作。然而,我们意识到,目前关于更高海拔的权衡是能够以更少的横断面和更短的飞行时间覆盖更大的区域。目前,UASs的覆盖范围限制主要源于技术和法律问题。然而,随着技术和法规的发展,对于希望向无人机过渡的自然资源管理者和研究人员来说,无人机和载人平台图像产品的技术和后勤比较将变得越来越重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Logistical and technical considerations for the use of unmanned aircraft systems in coastal habitat monitoring: A case study in high-resolution subaquatic vegetation assessment
In recent years, the technology and regulation surrounding the use of unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) has rapidly advanced. This has resulted in the availability of such technology for more common applications. Here we compare manned versus UAS platforms for acquiring high-resolution imagery of subaquatic habitat for the purpose of boat propeller scar delineation in seagrass meadows in Redfish Bay, Texas. We acquired aerial seagrass imagery in three 20-hectare plots using two UASs and one manned aircraft platform. The three plots represented a priori designations of low, moderate, and high seagrass scarring intensity. Overall, we observed that a smaller amount of scarring was detected in the manned aircraft imagery compared to that collected by the two UAS platforms, and that this disparity was much greater for the high scarring intensity plot. The observed differences in scar feature delineations were at least partially related to logistical difference between these two platforms — specifically, the lower altitude flown by the UASs results in a higher spatial resolution of the imagery that is less dependent on the camera specifications. From a logistical standpoint, the potential gain in spatial resolution via lower altitude flight could result in a reduced pricetag for high-resolution mapped products. Further, the rapid deployment and local operation typically resulting from the accessibility of UAS training greatly simplify the logistics of planning imagery acquisition at the appropriate scale. However, we realize that the current trade-off with regard to higher altitude is the ability to cover large areas with fewer transects and shorter flight time. Coverage limitations for UASs is currently rooted in both technological and legal issues. However, as technology and regulations evolve, the technical and logistical comparison of imagery products from UAS and manned platforms will become increasingly important to natural resource managers and researchers looking to make this transition to UAS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信