{"title":"有限线性有序树上的模块量词计数","authors":"Juha Nurmonen","doi":"10.1109/LICS.1996.561465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We give a combinatorial method for proving elementary equivalence in first-order logic FO with counting module n quantifiers D/sub n/. Inexpressibility results for FO(D/sub n/) with built-in linear order are also considered. We show that certain divisibility properties of word models are not definable in FO(D/sub n/). We also show that the height of complete n-ary trees cannot be expressed in FO(D/sub n/) with linear order. Interpreting the predicate y=nx as a complete n-ary tree, we show that the predicate y=(n+1)x cannot be defined in FO(D/sub n/) with linear order. This proves the conjecture of Niwinski and Stolboushkin (1993). We also discuss connection between our results and the well-known open problem in circuit complexity theory, whether ACC=NC/sup 1/.","PeriodicalId":382663,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 11th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counting module quantifiers on finite linearly ordered trees\",\"authors\":\"Juha Nurmonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LICS.1996.561465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We give a combinatorial method for proving elementary equivalence in first-order logic FO with counting module n quantifiers D/sub n/. Inexpressibility results for FO(D/sub n/) with built-in linear order are also considered. We show that certain divisibility properties of word models are not definable in FO(D/sub n/). We also show that the height of complete n-ary trees cannot be expressed in FO(D/sub n/) with linear order. Interpreting the predicate y=nx as a complete n-ary tree, we show that the predicate y=(n+1)x cannot be defined in FO(D/sub n/) with linear order. This proves the conjecture of Niwinski and Stolboushkin (1993). We also discuss connection between our results and the well-known open problem in circuit complexity theory, whether ACC=NC/sup 1/.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 11th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 11th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1996.561465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 11th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1996.561465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Counting module quantifiers on finite linearly ordered trees
We give a combinatorial method for proving elementary equivalence in first-order logic FO with counting module n quantifiers D/sub n/. Inexpressibility results for FO(D/sub n/) with built-in linear order are also considered. We show that certain divisibility properties of word models are not definable in FO(D/sub n/). We also show that the height of complete n-ary trees cannot be expressed in FO(D/sub n/) with linear order. Interpreting the predicate y=nx as a complete n-ary tree, we show that the predicate y=(n+1)x cannot be defined in FO(D/sub n/) with linear order. This proves the conjecture of Niwinski and Stolboushkin (1993). We also discuss connection between our results and the well-known open problem in circuit complexity theory, whether ACC=NC/sup 1/.