COVID-19疫苗犹豫:与性别、种族和卫生信息来源的关系

W. Sieber, S. Achar, Jivan Achar, Anish Dhamija, M. Tai-Seale, David R Strong
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗犹豫:与性别、种族和卫生信息来源的关系","authors":"W. Sieber, S. Achar, Jivan Achar, Anish Dhamija, M. Tai-Seale, David R Strong","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nVaccinations for COVID-19 are being distributed, yet vaccine hesitance is placing many people at risk for infection, negative outcomes, and compromising public health. Given primary care clinics are where people most often interact with health care providers, understanding factors associated with this hesitance may help providers in integrated primary care settings best address this hesitance.\n\n\nMETHOD\nBetween September and November of 2020, a survey was sent to all primary care patients within a large southern California health system, with over 10,000 responding (22% response rate). Survey items included sociodemographic variables, level of vaccine hesitance, \"proximity to COVID\" (e.g., direct exposure to COVID-19 and consequences), as well as a patient's primary source of health information (e.g., traditional news, social media, etc.). Responses assessed the strength of hesitance.\n\n\nRESULTS\nResults showed that while 78% of participants \"strongly\" believed vaccines generally are a good way to protect from illness, only 51% reported strong willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Consistent with previous surveys, younger patients were more hesitant to get vaccinated, as were people of color. Unique to this survey was the finding that those relying on social media, faith-based organizations, or family/friends for health information had the greatest vaccine hesitance.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nWhile our patient sample was less hesitant than other U.S. adult samples previously reported in the literature, our data suggest that targeting those patients who report reliance on nontraditional health information sources should be approached by primary care teams, including behavioral health providers, to address vaccine hesitancy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":358476,"journal":{"name":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Associations with gender, race, and source of health information.\",\"authors\":\"W. Sieber, S. Achar, Jivan Achar, Anish Dhamija, M. Tai-Seale, David R Strong\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nVaccinations for COVID-19 are being distributed, yet vaccine hesitance is placing many people at risk for infection, negative outcomes, and compromising public health. Given primary care clinics are where people most often interact with health care providers, understanding factors associated with this hesitance may help providers in integrated primary care settings best address this hesitance.\\n\\n\\nMETHOD\\nBetween September and November of 2020, a survey was sent to all primary care patients within a large southern California health system, with over 10,000 responding (22% response rate). Survey items included sociodemographic variables, level of vaccine hesitance, \\\"proximity to COVID\\\" (e.g., direct exposure to COVID-19 and consequences), as well as a patient's primary source of health information (e.g., traditional news, social media, etc.). Responses assessed the strength of hesitance.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nResults showed that while 78% of participants \\\"strongly\\\" believed vaccines generally are a good way to protect from illness, only 51% reported strong willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Consistent with previous surveys, younger patients were more hesitant to get vaccinated, as were people of color. Unique to this survey was the finding that those relying on social media, faith-based organizations, or family/friends for health information had the greatest vaccine hesitance.\\n\\n\\nDISCUSSION\\nWhile our patient sample was less hesitant than other U.S. adult samples previously reported in the literature, our data suggest that targeting those patients who report reliance on nontraditional health information sources should be approached by primary care teams, including behavioral health providers, to address vaccine hesitancy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":358476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前正在分发COVID-19疫苗,但对疫苗的犹豫使许多人面临感染、不良后果和危害公共卫生的风险。鉴于初级保健诊所是人们最常与卫生保健提供者互动的地方,了解与这种犹豫有关的因素可能有助于综合初级保健机构的提供者最好地解决这种犹豫。方法在2020年9月至11月期间,向南加州一个大型卫生系统内的所有初级保健患者发送了一项调查,有超过10,000人回复(22%的回复率)。调查项目包括社会人口统计学变量、疫苗犹豫程度、“接近COVID”(例如直接接触COVID-19及其后果)以及患者的主要健康信息来源(例如传统新闻、社交媒体等)。反应评估了犹豫的强度。结果显示,虽然78%的参与者“强烈”认为疫苗通常是预防疾病的好方法,但只有51%的参与者表示强烈愿意接种COVID-19疫苗。与之前的调查一致,年轻患者对接种疫苗更为犹豫,有色人种也是如此。这项调查的独特之处在于,那些依赖社交媒体、基于信仰的组织或家人/朋友获取健康信息的人对疫苗的犹豫程度最高。虽然我们的患者样本比文献中先前报道的其他美国成人样本更少犹豫不决,但我们的数据表明,初级保健团队(包括行为健康提供者)应该针对那些报告依赖非传统健康信息来源的患者,解决疫苗犹豫问题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Associations with gender, race, and source of health information.
INTRODUCTION Vaccinations for COVID-19 are being distributed, yet vaccine hesitance is placing many people at risk for infection, negative outcomes, and compromising public health. Given primary care clinics are where people most often interact with health care providers, understanding factors associated with this hesitance may help providers in integrated primary care settings best address this hesitance. METHOD Between September and November of 2020, a survey was sent to all primary care patients within a large southern California health system, with over 10,000 responding (22% response rate). Survey items included sociodemographic variables, level of vaccine hesitance, "proximity to COVID" (e.g., direct exposure to COVID-19 and consequences), as well as a patient's primary source of health information (e.g., traditional news, social media, etc.). Responses assessed the strength of hesitance. RESULTS Results showed that while 78% of participants "strongly" believed vaccines generally are a good way to protect from illness, only 51% reported strong willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Consistent with previous surveys, younger patients were more hesitant to get vaccinated, as were people of color. Unique to this survey was the finding that those relying on social media, faith-based organizations, or family/friends for health information had the greatest vaccine hesitance. DISCUSSION While our patient sample was less hesitant than other U.S. adult samples previously reported in the literature, our data suggest that targeting those patients who report reliance on nontraditional health information sources should be approached by primary care teams, including behavioral health providers, to address vaccine hesitancy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信