尼日利亚私募股权基金的监管:对离岸注册私募股权基金的偏好

M. Abada
{"title":"尼日利亚私募股权基金的监管:对离岸注册私募股权基金的偏好","authors":"M. Abada","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3491265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are elaborate regulatory regimes across different jurisdictions to ensure critical regulatory oversight over the private funds industry to which private equity (PE) funds belong. Such regulation typically focuses on either the adviser/manager of a fund, the fund itself, or both (as will be shown to be the case in Nigeria). The aim of this paper is to examine the regulation of PE funds in Nigeria vis-a-vis advanced jurisdictions like United States (U.S.) and United Kingdom (U.K.). Analyses in this paper aim to reveal that whilst it is important for every jurisdiction (including Nigeria) to regulate the private funds industry, the extant disclosure requirement that PE funds and advisers are subject to under the current Nigerian regulatory framework may discourage the domiciliation of PE funds in Nigeria. The author therefore canvasses for a possible change to the current regulatory framework for PE funds in Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":412394,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Economic Law (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulation of Private Equity Funds in Nigeria: The Preference for Offshore Domiciled Private Equity Fund\",\"authors\":\"M. Abada\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3491265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are elaborate regulatory regimes across different jurisdictions to ensure critical regulatory oversight over the private funds industry to which private equity (PE) funds belong. Such regulation typically focuses on either the adviser/manager of a fund, the fund itself, or both (as will be shown to be the case in Nigeria). The aim of this paper is to examine the regulation of PE funds in Nigeria vis-a-vis advanced jurisdictions like United States (U.S.) and United Kingdom (U.K.). Analyses in this paper aim to reveal that whilst it is important for every jurisdiction (including Nigeria) to regulate the private funds industry, the extant disclosure requirement that PE funds and advisers are subject to under the current Nigerian regulatory framework may discourage the domiciliation of PE funds in Nigeria. The author therefore canvasses for a possible change to the current regulatory framework for PE funds in Nigeria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AARN: Economic Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AARN: Economic Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3491265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Economic Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3491265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同司法管辖区都有详尽的监管制度,以确保对私募股权基金所属的私募基金行业进行关键监管。此类监管通常侧重于基金的顾问/经理,基金本身,或两者兼而有之(如尼日利亚的情况)。本文的目的是研究尼日利亚私募股权基金相对于美国和英国等先进司法管辖区的监管。本文的分析旨在揭示,虽然每个司法管辖区(包括尼日利亚)对私募基金行业进行监管很重要,但在目前的尼日利亚监管框架下,私募基金和顾问必须遵守的现有披露要求可能会阻碍私募基金在尼日利亚的注册。因此,作者对尼日利亚目前私募股权基金的监管框架进行了可能的改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulation of Private Equity Funds in Nigeria: The Preference for Offshore Domiciled Private Equity Fund
There are elaborate regulatory regimes across different jurisdictions to ensure critical regulatory oversight over the private funds industry to which private equity (PE) funds belong. Such regulation typically focuses on either the adviser/manager of a fund, the fund itself, or both (as will be shown to be the case in Nigeria). The aim of this paper is to examine the regulation of PE funds in Nigeria vis-a-vis advanced jurisdictions like United States (U.S.) and United Kingdom (U.K.). Analyses in this paper aim to reveal that whilst it is important for every jurisdiction (including Nigeria) to regulate the private funds industry, the extant disclosure requirement that PE funds and advisers are subject to under the current Nigerian regulatory framework may discourage the domiciliation of PE funds in Nigeria. The author therefore canvasses for a possible change to the current regulatory framework for PE funds in Nigeria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信