{"title":"思维方式、学习方式与沟通方式的关系分析","authors":"Aloysius Liliweri","doi":"10.4172/2469-9837.1000192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study focuses on identifying and describing (1) the communication style, (2) the thinking style, (3) the learning style of the postgraduate (graduates and postgraduates) students of Nusa Cendana university (Universitas Nusa Cendana (Undana), (4) the level of relationship of thinking style and communication style of the students, (5) the level of the relationship of learning style and communication style of the students, (6) the level of the relationship of both, thinking and learning styles with the communication style, and (7) the level of the difference between thinking style, learning style and communication style of the students. The study applies the correlation design of quantitative research involving 203 samples of 306 student population. The study reports the following main findings. (1) In general the students vary in their communication style according to listeners, creator, doers, thinkers. (2) To be in detail, whatever type of communication style (listeners, creators, initiators, and thinkers) is not determined by any type of thinking style (synthetic, idealistic, pragmatic, analytic, and realistic). (3) Then, whatever type of communication style performed by the students (listeners, creators, active doers, and thinkers) is not determined by learning style variations (visual, auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic). (4) Another finding is there is no significant relationship shown by the three variables studied, thinking, learning, and communication styles, as is shown by correlation coefficient at 0.010. (5) Finally, there is difference in thinking style, learning style, and communication style performed by the students, male and female students.","PeriodicalId":439866,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis on the Relationship of Thinking and Learning Styles withCommunication Style\",\"authors\":\"Aloysius Liliweri\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2469-9837.1000192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study focuses on identifying and describing (1) the communication style, (2) the thinking style, (3) the learning style of the postgraduate (graduates and postgraduates) students of Nusa Cendana university (Universitas Nusa Cendana (Undana), (4) the level of relationship of thinking style and communication style of the students, (5) the level of the relationship of learning style and communication style of the students, (6) the level of the relationship of both, thinking and learning styles with the communication style, and (7) the level of the difference between thinking style, learning style and communication style of the students. The study applies the correlation design of quantitative research involving 203 samples of 306 student population. The study reports the following main findings. (1) In general the students vary in their communication style according to listeners, creator, doers, thinkers. (2) To be in detail, whatever type of communication style (listeners, creators, initiators, and thinkers) is not determined by any type of thinking style (synthetic, idealistic, pragmatic, analytic, and realistic). (3) Then, whatever type of communication style performed by the students (listeners, creators, active doers, and thinkers) is not determined by learning style variations (visual, auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic). (4) Another finding is there is no significant relationship shown by the three variables studied, thinking, learning, and communication styles, as is shown by correlation coefficient at 0.010. (5) Finally, there is difference in thinking style, learning style, and communication style performed by the students, male and female students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-9837.1000192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-9837.1000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本研究的重点是识别和描述Nusa Cendana大学(Universitas Nusa Cendana (Undana))研究生(研究生和研究生)学生的(1)沟通风格,(2)思维风格,(3)学习风格,(4)学生思维风格和沟通风格的关系水平,(5)学生学习风格和沟通风格的关系水平,(6)两者的关系水平,(7)学生的思维方式、学习方式和沟通方式的水平差异。本研究采用定量研究的相关设计,涉及306名学生群体203个样本。该研究报告了以下主要发现。(1)一般来说,根据听众、创造者、实干家、思考者的不同,学生的沟通方式也有所不同。(2)具体来说,任何类型的沟通风格(听众、创造者、发起者和思考者)都不是由任何类型的思维风格(综合型、理想型、务实型、分析型和现实型)决定的。(3)学生(倾听者、创造者、积极实干者和思考者)所表现的任何类型的交流风格都不是由学习风格的变化(视觉、听觉、读写和动觉)决定的。(4)另一个发现是,思维方式、学习方式和沟通方式这三个变量之间没有显著的相关关系,相关系数为0.010。(5)最后,男女学生在思维方式、学习方式、沟通方式上存在差异。
An Analysis on the Relationship of Thinking and Learning Styles withCommunication Style
The study focuses on identifying and describing (1) the communication style, (2) the thinking style, (3) the learning style of the postgraduate (graduates and postgraduates) students of Nusa Cendana university (Universitas Nusa Cendana (Undana), (4) the level of relationship of thinking style and communication style of the students, (5) the level of the relationship of learning style and communication style of the students, (6) the level of the relationship of both, thinking and learning styles with the communication style, and (7) the level of the difference between thinking style, learning style and communication style of the students. The study applies the correlation design of quantitative research involving 203 samples of 306 student population. The study reports the following main findings. (1) In general the students vary in their communication style according to listeners, creator, doers, thinkers. (2) To be in detail, whatever type of communication style (listeners, creators, initiators, and thinkers) is not determined by any type of thinking style (synthetic, idealistic, pragmatic, analytic, and realistic). (3) Then, whatever type of communication style performed by the students (listeners, creators, active doers, and thinkers) is not determined by learning style variations (visual, auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic). (4) Another finding is there is no significant relationship shown by the three variables studied, thinking, learning, and communication styles, as is shown by correlation coefficient at 0.010. (5) Finally, there is difference in thinking style, learning style, and communication style performed by the students, male and female students.