在储存过程中验证CO2羽流一致性的野外地球物理调查的量化效率

E. Barros, O. Leeuwenburgh, S. Carpentier, F. Wilschut, F. Neele
{"title":"在储存过程中验证CO2羽流一致性的野外地球物理调查的量化效率","authors":"E. Barros, O. Leeuwenburgh, S. Carpentier, F. Wilschut, F. Neele","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201802991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To manage risks in CO2 storage operations, monitoring systems need to be designed such that the data can inform the operator whether the storage site will continue to behave as expected or not. In order to compare the benefits of different monitoring strategies, we require a measure of ‘efficiency' that is based on a balance between monitoring cost on the one hand and reliability of conformance determination on the other. In this work, we present a workflow to quantify, in terms of conformance verification metrics, the contribution of monitoring strategies with various time-lapse geophysical survey configurations (i.e., different survey acquisition times and coverage) in the presence of geological uncertainties. We illustrate the use of the methodology with a simple case study where conformance is associated with regulatory safety bounds for the development of the CO2 plume. The proposed approach can be used to assist operators in the design of monitoring strategies that can ensure compliance with regulation requirements at a reasonable cost. © 2018 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, EAGE. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":254996,"journal":{"name":"Fifth CO2 Geological Storage Workshop","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Efficiency Of Field-Wide Geophysical Surveys For Verifying CO2 Plume Conformance During Storage Operations\",\"authors\":\"E. Barros, O. Leeuwenburgh, S. Carpentier, F. Wilschut, F. Neele\",\"doi\":\"10.3997/2214-4609.201802991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To manage risks in CO2 storage operations, monitoring systems need to be designed such that the data can inform the operator whether the storage site will continue to behave as expected or not. In order to compare the benefits of different monitoring strategies, we require a measure of ‘efficiency' that is based on a balance between monitoring cost on the one hand and reliability of conformance determination on the other. In this work, we present a workflow to quantify, in terms of conformance verification metrics, the contribution of monitoring strategies with various time-lapse geophysical survey configurations (i.e., different survey acquisition times and coverage) in the presence of geological uncertainties. We illustrate the use of the methodology with a simple case study where conformance is associated with regulatory safety bounds for the development of the CO2 plume. The proposed approach can be used to assist operators in the design of monitoring strategies that can ensure compliance with regulation requirements at a reasonable cost. © 2018 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, EAGE. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth CO2 Geological Storage Workshop\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth CO2 Geological Storage Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth CO2 Geological Storage Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

为了管理二氧化碳储存操作的风险,需要设计监测系统,以便数据可以告知操作员储存地点是否会继续按照预期运行。为了比较不同监控策略的好处,我们需要一种衡量“效率”的方法,这种方法一方面是基于监控成本,另一方面是基于一致性确定的可靠性。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个工作流来量化,在一致性验证指标方面,在存在地质不确定性的情况下,各种时移地球物理调查配置(即不同的调查获取时间和覆盖范围)的监测策略的贡献。我们用一个简单的案例研究来说明该方法的使用,其中一致性与二氧化碳羽流发展的监管安全界限有关。建议的方法可用于帮助运营商设计监测策略,以确保以合理的成本遵守法规要求。©2018欧洲地球科学家和工程师协会,EAGE。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Efficiency Of Field-Wide Geophysical Surveys For Verifying CO2 Plume Conformance During Storage Operations
To manage risks in CO2 storage operations, monitoring systems need to be designed such that the data can inform the operator whether the storage site will continue to behave as expected or not. In order to compare the benefits of different monitoring strategies, we require a measure of ‘efficiency' that is based on a balance between monitoring cost on the one hand and reliability of conformance determination on the other. In this work, we present a workflow to quantify, in terms of conformance verification metrics, the contribution of monitoring strategies with various time-lapse geophysical survey configurations (i.e., different survey acquisition times and coverage) in the presence of geological uncertainties. We illustrate the use of the methodology with a simple case study where conformance is associated with regulatory safety bounds for the development of the CO2 plume. The proposed approach can be used to assist operators in the design of monitoring strategies that can ensure compliance with regulation requirements at a reasonable cost. © 2018 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, EAGE. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信