交叉发行版bug的影响是重复的,对Debian和Ubuntu的实证研究

Vincent Boisselle, Bram Adams
{"title":"交叉发行版bug的影响是重复的,对Debian和Ubuntu的实证研究","authors":"Vincent Boisselle, Bram Adams","doi":"10.1109/SCAM.2015.7335409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although open source distributions like Debian and Ubuntu are closely related, sometimes a bug reported in the Debian bug repository is reported independently in the Ubuntu repository as well, without the Ubuntu users nor developers being aware. Such cases of undetected cross-distribution bug duplicates can cause developers and users to lose precious time working on a fix that already exists or to work individually instead of collaborating to find a fix faster. We perform a case study on Ubuntu and Debian bug repositories to measure the amount of cross-distribution bug duplicates and estimate the amount of time lost. By adapting an existing within-project duplicate detection approach (achieving a similar recall of 60%), we find 821 cross-duplicates. The early detection of such duplicates could reduce the time lost by users waiting for a fix by a median of 38 days. Furthermore, we estimate that developers from the different distributions lose a median of 47 days in which they could have collaborated together, had they been aware of duplicates. These results show the need to detect and monitor cross-distribution duplicates.","PeriodicalId":192232,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 15th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of cross-distribution bug duplicates, empirical study on Debian and Ubuntu\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Boisselle, Bram Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SCAM.2015.7335409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although open source distributions like Debian and Ubuntu are closely related, sometimes a bug reported in the Debian bug repository is reported independently in the Ubuntu repository as well, without the Ubuntu users nor developers being aware. Such cases of undetected cross-distribution bug duplicates can cause developers and users to lose precious time working on a fix that already exists or to work individually instead of collaborating to find a fix faster. We perform a case study on Ubuntu and Debian bug repositories to measure the amount of cross-distribution bug duplicates and estimate the amount of time lost. By adapting an existing within-project duplicate detection approach (achieving a similar recall of 60%), we find 821 cross-duplicates. The early detection of such duplicates could reduce the time lost by users waiting for a fix by a median of 38 days. Furthermore, we estimate that developers from the different distributions lose a median of 47 days in which they could have collaborated together, had they been aware of duplicates. These results show the need to detect and monitor cross-distribution duplicates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 15th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 15th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM.2015.7335409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 15th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM.2015.7335409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

尽管像Debian和Ubuntu这样的开源发行版是密切相关的,但有时在Debian错误存储库中报告的错误也会在Ubuntu存储库中独立报告,而Ubuntu用户和开发人员都不知道。这种未被发现的跨发行版错误重复可能会导致开发人员和用户浪费宝贵的时间来修复已经存在的修复,或者单独工作,而不是协作来更快地找到修复。我们对Ubuntu和Debian的bug库进行了一个案例研究,以衡量跨发行版的重复bug的数量,并估计损失的时间。通过采用现有的项目内部重复检测方法(达到相似的60%召回率),我们发现了821个交叉重复。早期发现这种重复可以减少用户等待修复的时间,平均减少38天。此外,我们估计来自不同发行版的开发人员损失了平均47天的时间,如果他们意识到重复的话。这些结果表明需要检测和监测交叉分布的重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of cross-distribution bug duplicates, empirical study on Debian and Ubuntu
Although open source distributions like Debian and Ubuntu are closely related, sometimes a bug reported in the Debian bug repository is reported independently in the Ubuntu repository as well, without the Ubuntu users nor developers being aware. Such cases of undetected cross-distribution bug duplicates can cause developers and users to lose precious time working on a fix that already exists or to work individually instead of collaborating to find a fix faster. We perform a case study on Ubuntu and Debian bug repositories to measure the amount of cross-distribution bug duplicates and estimate the amount of time lost. By adapting an existing within-project duplicate detection approach (achieving a similar recall of 60%), we find 821 cross-duplicates. The early detection of such duplicates could reduce the time lost by users waiting for a fix by a median of 38 days. Furthermore, we estimate that developers from the different distributions lose a median of 47 days in which they could have collaborated together, had they been aware of duplicates. These results show the need to detect and monitor cross-distribution duplicates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信