U. Karadžić, A. Bergant, Danica Starinac, Boško Božović
{"title":"高水头水电站在甚高雷诺数下停堆的水锤研究","authors":"U. Karadžić, A. Bergant, Danica Starinac, Boško Božović","doi":"10.5545/SV-JME.2019.6092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water hammer in hydropower plants (HPPs) is caused by the closing or opening of the turbine unit distributors, the operation of the safety shutoff valves, as well as unwanted turbine runaway. Careful water hammer control is essential to ensure reliable operation of hydropower plants. If this is not provided, severe problems may arise in operation, damage to individual components of the system may occur or, in the worst case, accidents with human casualties may happen [1] to [5]. Modelling and analysis of extreme hydraulic transients (plant emergency shut-down) in new or refurbished HPPs are of utmost importance because, in this way, extreme values of pressures that may occur during system exploitation can be determined. Based on these values, closing and opening times of the turbine units’ distributors are devised, as well as dimensioning of the system components is done. The objective of this paper is to investigate and discuss water hammer effects in Perućica HPP, Montenegro during the entire plant emergency shutdown, i.e., simultaneous closure of all seven Pelton turbine units. The units are installed in three parallel penstocks (each of about 2 km long) that are coupled to a concrete tunnel (about 3.3 km long) with a surge tank. Previously, measurements of the first and second Pelton turbines in one penstock only have been investigated [6]. This paper presents new results at much higher Reynolds number flows (higher than 107) than previously presented (in order of 106). In the first part of the paper, mathematical tools for solving water hammer equations are presented [7] and [8]. Friction losses in the plant’s penstocks are calculated with two different models: (1) standard quasi-steady (QSF) and (2) convolutionbased unsteady friction model (CBM) [9] and [10]. Turbine speed change during emergency shut-down is calculated, taking into account dissipative torques, including the shaft-bearing friction torque and ventilation losses in the turbine housing [6]. In the second part of the paper, comparisons of numerical Water Hammer Investigation of the Shut-Down of a High-Head Hydropower Plant at Very High Reynolds Number Flows Karadžić, U. – Bergant, A. – Starinac, D. – Božović, B. Uroš Karadžić1,* – Anton Bergant2,3 – Danica Starinac4 – Boško Božović5 1University of Montenegro, Montenegro 2Litostroj Power d.o.o., Slovenia 3University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovenia 4Jaroslav Černi Institute, Serbia 5Electric Power Supply Company, Montenegro","PeriodicalId":135907,"journal":{"name":"Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water Hammer Investigation of the Shut-Down of a High-Head Hydropower Plant at Very High Reynolds Number Flows\",\"authors\":\"U. Karadžić, A. Bergant, Danica Starinac, Boško Božović\",\"doi\":\"10.5545/SV-JME.2019.6092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Water hammer in hydropower plants (HPPs) is caused by the closing or opening of the turbine unit distributors, the operation of the safety shutoff valves, as well as unwanted turbine runaway. Careful water hammer control is essential to ensure reliable operation of hydropower plants. If this is not provided, severe problems may arise in operation, damage to individual components of the system may occur or, in the worst case, accidents with human casualties may happen [1] to [5]. Modelling and analysis of extreme hydraulic transients (plant emergency shut-down) in new or refurbished HPPs are of utmost importance because, in this way, extreme values of pressures that may occur during system exploitation can be determined. Based on these values, closing and opening times of the turbine units’ distributors are devised, as well as dimensioning of the system components is done. The objective of this paper is to investigate and discuss water hammer effects in Perućica HPP, Montenegro during the entire plant emergency shutdown, i.e., simultaneous closure of all seven Pelton turbine units. The units are installed in three parallel penstocks (each of about 2 km long) that are coupled to a concrete tunnel (about 3.3 km long) with a surge tank. Previously, measurements of the first and second Pelton turbines in one penstock only have been investigated [6]. This paper presents new results at much higher Reynolds number flows (higher than 107) than previously presented (in order of 106). In the first part of the paper, mathematical tools for solving water hammer equations are presented [7] and [8]. Friction losses in the plant’s penstocks are calculated with two different models: (1) standard quasi-steady (QSF) and (2) convolutionbased unsteady friction model (CBM) [9] and [10]. Turbine speed change during emergency shut-down is calculated, taking into account dissipative torques, including the shaft-bearing friction torque and ventilation losses in the turbine housing [6]. In the second part of the paper, comparisons of numerical Water Hammer Investigation of the Shut-Down of a High-Head Hydropower Plant at Very High Reynolds Number Flows Karadžić, U. – Bergant, A. – Starinac, D. – Božović, B. Uroš Karadžić1,* – Anton Bergant2,3 – Danica Starinac4 – Boško Božović5 1University of Montenegro, Montenegro 2Litostroj Power d.o.o., Slovenia 3University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovenia 4Jaroslav Černi Institute, Serbia 5Electric Power Supply Company, Montenegro\",\"PeriodicalId\":135907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5545/SV-JME.2019.6092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5545/SV-JME.2019.6092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
水电厂的水锤是由水轮机分配器的关闭或打开、安全关闭阀的运行以及不需要的水轮机失控引起的。水锤控制是保证水电厂可靠运行的关键。如果不这样做,可能会在操作中出现严重的问题,可能会损坏系统的单个组件,或者在最坏的情况下,可能会发生人员伤亡事故。对新建或翻新的高压发电厂的极端水力瞬变(工厂紧急停机)进行建模和分析是至关重要的,因为这样可以确定系统开发过程中可能出现的极端压力值。在此基础上,设计了汽轮机组分配器的合闸和开闸时间,并确定了系统部件的尺寸。本文的目的是调查和讨论黑山Perućica HPP在整个工厂紧急关闭期间的水锤效应,即同时关闭所有七个Pelton水轮机机组。机组安装在三个平行的压力管道中(每个管道长约2公里),并连接到一个混凝土隧道(长约3.3公里)和一个调压箱。在此之前,测量第一和第二佩尔顿涡轮机在一个压力管只被调查。本文在高雷诺数流(高于107)的情况下给出了比以前(按106的顺序)高得多的新结果。本文第一部分给出了求解水锤方程的数学工具[7]和[8]。采用两种不同的模型(1)标准准稳态(QSF)模型和(2)基于卷积的非定常摩擦模型(CBM)[9]和[10]模型计算电厂压力管的摩擦损失。考虑耗散力矩,包括轴轴承摩擦力矩和涡轮壳体通风损失[6],计算紧急停机时涡轮的转速变化。在论文的第二部分,高水头水电站在非常高雷诺数下停堆的数值水锤研究比较Karadžić, U. - Bergant, a . - Starinac, D. - Božović, B. Uroš Karadžić1,* - Anton bergant2,3 - Danica Starinac4 - Boško Božović5 1黑山大学,黑山2Litostroj Power d.o.o.,斯洛文尼亚3卢布尔雅那大学机械工程学院,斯洛文尼亚4雅罗斯lav Černi研究所,塞尔维亚电力供应公司,黑山
Water Hammer Investigation of the Shut-Down of a High-Head Hydropower Plant at Very High Reynolds Number Flows
Water hammer in hydropower plants (HPPs) is caused by the closing or opening of the turbine unit distributors, the operation of the safety shutoff valves, as well as unwanted turbine runaway. Careful water hammer control is essential to ensure reliable operation of hydropower plants. If this is not provided, severe problems may arise in operation, damage to individual components of the system may occur or, in the worst case, accidents with human casualties may happen [1] to [5]. Modelling and analysis of extreme hydraulic transients (plant emergency shut-down) in new or refurbished HPPs are of utmost importance because, in this way, extreme values of pressures that may occur during system exploitation can be determined. Based on these values, closing and opening times of the turbine units’ distributors are devised, as well as dimensioning of the system components is done. The objective of this paper is to investigate and discuss water hammer effects in Perućica HPP, Montenegro during the entire plant emergency shutdown, i.e., simultaneous closure of all seven Pelton turbine units. The units are installed in three parallel penstocks (each of about 2 km long) that are coupled to a concrete tunnel (about 3.3 km long) with a surge tank. Previously, measurements of the first and second Pelton turbines in one penstock only have been investigated [6]. This paper presents new results at much higher Reynolds number flows (higher than 107) than previously presented (in order of 106). In the first part of the paper, mathematical tools for solving water hammer equations are presented [7] and [8]. Friction losses in the plant’s penstocks are calculated with two different models: (1) standard quasi-steady (QSF) and (2) convolutionbased unsteady friction model (CBM) [9] and [10]. Turbine speed change during emergency shut-down is calculated, taking into account dissipative torques, including the shaft-bearing friction torque and ventilation losses in the turbine housing [6]. In the second part of the paper, comparisons of numerical Water Hammer Investigation of the Shut-Down of a High-Head Hydropower Plant at Very High Reynolds Number Flows Karadžić, U. – Bergant, A. – Starinac, D. – Božović, B. Uroš Karadžić1,* – Anton Bergant2,3 – Danica Starinac4 – Boško Božović5 1University of Montenegro, Montenegro 2Litostroj Power d.o.o., Slovenia 3University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovenia 4Jaroslav Černi Institute, Serbia 5Electric Power Supply Company, Montenegro