{"title":"Materialność świetlnego zapisu – o rzeczach w dorobku Jerzego Lewczyńskiego","authors":"Weronika Kobylińska-Bunsch","doi":"10.14746/AQ.2018.29.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The popularity of Jerzy Lewczyński (1924-2014) coincided with the academic interest in the problem of archive, corresponding to Lewczyński’s program of the “archeology of photography,” developed in the 1970s. Lewczyński’s idea consisted in restoring Kantor’s “reality of the lowest rank,” i.e. the rejected microhistories hidden in the anonymous and the forgotten or taken out of an ashtray at the Warsaw Central train station. Today, however, one tends to forget that Lewczyński’s gesture of artistic legitimization did not aim at giving new meanings, but above all at blurring the boundary between everyday items and those which emerged from some kind of “aesthetic situation” (Maria Gołaszewska). This aspect of his art can be seen, e. g, in his visual journal, where the artist included objects of particular importance – next to Xerox copies of his own works or works of other artists, he placed also shopping receipts. Lewczyński equaled the value of cheap receipt paper with the noble velvety quality of bromine. He did not reduce his collected items to their aesthetic function, having rejected the institutionalized idea of the artifact as a work of art to enjoy by the audience. Anticipating the postulates of Bruno Latour, instead of showing objects appropriated by the power of the gaze, he presented actors: things that asked questions on their own.","PeriodicalId":345400,"journal":{"name":"Artium Quaestiones","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artium Quaestiones","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/AQ.2018.29.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Jerzy Lewczyński(1924-2014)的流行恰逢学术界对档案问题的兴趣,对应于1970年代发展起来的Lewczyński“摄影考古学”项目。Lewczyński的想法包括恢复坎特的“最低等级的现实”,即被拒绝的微观历史隐藏在匿名和被遗忘或从华沙中央火车站的烟灰缸中取出。然而,今天,人们往往会忘记Lewczyński艺术合法化的姿态并非旨在赋予新的意义,而首先是模糊日常物品与从某种“美学情境”中出现的物品之间的界限(Maria Gołaszewska)。他的艺术的这一方面可以看到,例如,在他的视觉日志中,艺术家包括了特别重要的物品——在他自己的作品或其他艺术家的作品的复印本旁边,他也放了购物收据。Lewczyński相当于廉价收据纸的价值与溴的高贵天鹅绒般的品质。他并没有将他的收藏物品简化为它们的美学功能,他拒绝了将艺术品作为观众欣赏的艺术作品的制度化观念。他预见到布鲁诺·拉图尔(Bruno Latour)的假设,没有展示被凝视的力量所占有的物体,而是展示了演员:那些自己提出问题的东西。
Materialność świetlnego zapisu – o rzeczach w dorobku Jerzego Lewczyńskiego
The popularity of Jerzy Lewczyński (1924-2014) coincided with the academic interest in the problem of archive, corresponding to Lewczyński’s program of the “archeology of photography,” developed in the 1970s. Lewczyński’s idea consisted in restoring Kantor’s “reality of the lowest rank,” i.e. the rejected microhistories hidden in the anonymous and the forgotten or taken out of an ashtray at the Warsaw Central train station. Today, however, one tends to forget that Lewczyński’s gesture of artistic legitimization did not aim at giving new meanings, but above all at blurring the boundary between everyday items and those which emerged from some kind of “aesthetic situation” (Maria Gołaszewska). This aspect of his art can be seen, e. g, in his visual journal, where the artist included objects of particular importance – next to Xerox copies of his own works or works of other artists, he placed also shopping receipts. Lewczyński equaled the value of cheap receipt paper with the noble velvety quality of bromine. He did not reduce his collected items to their aesthetic function, having rejected the institutionalized idea of the artifact as a work of art to enjoy by the audience. Anticipating the postulates of Bruno Latour, instead of showing objects appropriated by the power of the gaze, he presented actors: things that asked questions on their own.