基于Twitter数据集的2020年美国总统大选中VADER和EDA之间的情感分析

Ria Endsuy
{"title":"基于Twitter数据集的2020年美国总统大选中VADER和EDA之间的情感分析","authors":"Ria Endsuy","doi":"10.47738/JADS.V2I1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2020 US Election took place on November 3, 2020, the result of the election was that Joe Biden received 51.4% of the votes, Donald Trump 46.9%, and the rest were other candidates. The period before the election was a time when people conveyed who would vote and conveyed the reasons directly or through social media, especially Twitter through keywords or tags such as #JoeBiden & #DonaldTrump. In this paper, we will compare sentiment analysis and exploratory data analysis against US election data on Twitter. The overall objective of the two case studies is to evaluate the similarity between the sentiment of location-based tweets and on-ground public opinion reflected in election results. In this paper, we find that there are more \"neutral\" sentiments than \"negative\" and \"positive\" sentiments. This study are focused finding sentimental tweets that people say on twitter for both presidential candidate and The dataset used is from and provided by Kaggle and has been updated on November 18, 2020, it is hoped that we hope that the academic community, computational journalists and research practitioners alike can utilize our dataset to study relevant scientific and social problems.","PeriodicalId":341738,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Data Sciences","volume":"668 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentiment Analysis between VADER and EDA for the US Presidential Election 2020 on Twitter Datasets\",\"authors\":\"Ria Endsuy\",\"doi\":\"10.47738/JADS.V2I1.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2020 US Election took place on November 3, 2020, the result of the election was that Joe Biden received 51.4% of the votes, Donald Trump 46.9%, and the rest were other candidates. The period before the election was a time when people conveyed who would vote and conveyed the reasons directly or through social media, especially Twitter through keywords or tags such as #JoeBiden & #DonaldTrump. In this paper, we will compare sentiment analysis and exploratory data analysis against US election data on Twitter. The overall objective of the two case studies is to evaluate the similarity between the sentiment of location-based tweets and on-ground public opinion reflected in election results. In this paper, we find that there are more \\\"neutral\\\" sentiments than \\\"negative\\\" and \\\"positive\\\" sentiments. This study are focused finding sentimental tweets that people say on twitter for both presidential candidate and The dataset used is from and provided by Kaggle and has been updated on November 18, 2020, it is hoped that we hope that the academic community, computational journalists and research practitioners alike can utilize our dataset to study relevant scientific and social problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Data Sciences\",\"volume\":\"668 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Data Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47738/JADS.V2I1.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Data Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47738/JADS.V2I1.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

2020年美国大选于2020年11月3日举行,选举结果为乔·拜登获得51.4%的选票,唐纳德·特朗普获得46.9%的选票,其余为其他候选人。在选举前的一段时间里,人们直接或通过社交媒体,特别是推特,通过关键词或标签(如#JoeBiden和#DonaldTrump)传达谁会投票和原因。在本文中,我们将对Twitter上的美国大选数据进行情感分析和探索性数据分析的比较。这两个案例研究的总体目标是评估基于位置的推文的情绪与选举结果中反映的实地民意之间的相似性。在本文中,我们发现“中性”情绪多于“消极”和“积极”情绪。本研究的重点是寻找人们在推特上为总统候选人发表的情感推文,使用的数据集来自并由Kaggle提供,并于2020年11月18日更新,希望我们希望学术界,计算记者和研究从业者都能利用我们的数据集来研究相关的科学和社会问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentiment Analysis between VADER and EDA for the US Presidential Election 2020 on Twitter Datasets
The 2020 US Election took place on November 3, 2020, the result of the election was that Joe Biden received 51.4% of the votes, Donald Trump 46.9%, and the rest were other candidates. The period before the election was a time when people conveyed who would vote and conveyed the reasons directly or through social media, especially Twitter through keywords or tags such as #JoeBiden & #DonaldTrump. In this paper, we will compare sentiment analysis and exploratory data analysis against US election data on Twitter. The overall objective of the two case studies is to evaluate the similarity between the sentiment of location-based tweets and on-ground public opinion reflected in election results. In this paper, we find that there are more "neutral" sentiments than "negative" and "positive" sentiments. This study are focused finding sentimental tweets that people say on twitter for both presidential candidate and The dataset used is from and provided by Kaggle and has been updated on November 18, 2020, it is hoped that we hope that the academic community, computational journalists and research practitioners alike can utilize our dataset to study relevant scientific and social problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信