使用不公平分布式调度程序的自稳定互斥

A. Datta, M. Potop-Butucaru, S. Tixeuil
{"title":"使用不公平分布式调度程序的自稳定互斥","authors":"A. Datta, M. Potop-Butucaru, S. Tixeuil","doi":"10.1109/IPDPS.2000.846023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A self-stabilizing algorithm, regardless of the initial system state, converges infinite time to a set of states that satisfy a legitimacy predicate without the need for explicit exception handler of backward recovery. Mutual exclusion is fundamental in the area of distributed computing, by serializing the accesses to a common shared resource. All existing probabilistic self-stabilizing mutual exclusion algorithms designed to work under an unfair distributed scheduler suffer from the following common drawback: Once stabilized, there exists no upper bound of time between two executions of the critical section at a given node. We present the first probabilistic self-stabilizing algorithm that guarantees such a bound (O(n/sup 3/), where n is the network size) while working using an unfair distributed scheduler. As the scheduling adversary gets weaker the bound gets better. Our algorithm works in an anonymous unidirectional ring of any size and has a O(n/sup 3/) expected stabilization time.","PeriodicalId":206541,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 14th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2000","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-stabilizing mutual exclusion using unfair distributed scheduler\",\"authors\":\"A. Datta, M. Potop-Butucaru, S. Tixeuil\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPDPS.2000.846023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A self-stabilizing algorithm, regardless of the initial system state, converges infinite time to a set of states that satisfy a legitimacy predicate without the need for explicit exception handler of backward recovery. Mutual exclusion is fundamental in the area of distributed computing, by serializing the accesses to a common shared resource. All existing probabilistic self-stabilizing mutual exclusion algorithms designed to work under an unfair distributed scheduler suffer from the following common drawback: Once stabilized, there exists no upper bound of time between two executions of the critical section at a given node. We present the first probabilistic self-stabilizing algorithm that guarantees such a bound (O(n/sup 3/), where n is the network size) while working using an unfair distributed scheduler. As the scheduling adversary gets weaker the bound gets better. Our algorithm works in an anonymous unidirectional ring of any size and has a O(n/sup 3/) expected stabilization time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 14th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2000\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 14th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2000.846023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 14th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2000.846023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

无论系统初始状态如何,自稳定算法都可以将无限时间收敛到满足合法性谓词的一组状态,而不需要显式的向后恢复异常处理程序。互斥是分布式计算领域的基础,通过序列化对公共共享资源的访问。所有现有的概率自稳定互斥算法都设计在一个不公平的分布式调度程序下工作,它们都有以下共同的缺点:一旦稳定下来,在给定节点上两次执行临界部分之间没有时间上限。我们提出了第一个概率自稳定算法,该算法在使用不公平分布式调度程序时保证了这样一个边界(O(n/sup 3/),其中n是网络大小)。随着调度对手变得越来越弱,边界也变得越来越好。该算法适用于任意大小的匿名单向环,期望稳定时间为0 (n/sup 3/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-stabilizing mutual exclusion using unfair distributed scheduler
A self-stabilizing algorithm, regardless of the initial system state, converges infinite time to a set of states that satisfy a legitimacy predicate without the need for explicit exception handler of backward recovery. Mutual exclusion is fundamental in the area of distributed computing, by serializing the accesses to a common shared resource. All existing probabilistic self-stabilizing mutual exclusion algorithms designed to work under an unfair distributed scheduler suffer from the following common drawback: Once stabilized, there exists no upper bound of time between two executions of the critical section at a given node. We present the first probabilistic self-stabilizing algorithm that guarantees such a bound (O(n/sup 3/), where n is the network size) while working using an unfair distributed scheduler. As the scheduling adversary gets weaker the bound gets better. Our algorithm works in an anonymous unidirectional ring of any size and has a O(n/sup 3/) expected stabilization time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信