移动无线网络中移动IP、快速切换和mSCTP切换性能比较

Ken C. K. Tsang, Cho-Li Wang, F. Lau
{"title":"移动无线网络中移动IP、快速切换和mSCTP切换性能比较","authors":"Ken C. K. Tsang, Cho-Li Wang, F. Lau","doi":"10.1109/I-SPAN.2008.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare the performance of three handoff protocols, namely Mobile IP, Fast Handoff and mSCTP. Among the three schemes, Mobile IP suffers from the lowest data throughput and longest handoff latency. Fast Handoff can perform better, provided that the mobile node can handoff to the new base station at an appropriate time instant when data forwarding between network routers begins. mSCTP supports multihoming; the mobile node does not need to determine the exact handoff time. Nevertheless, packet reordering and the subsequent fast retransmission degrades its handoff performance. To avoid these problems, adding some flow control operations in the transport layer is necessary. Flow control should be carried out in-sync with the handoff operations. This implies the transport layer should additionally recognise when do the handoff procedures start or finish. We therefore come up with a natural choice in designing a handoff scheme, which is to centralise the handoff and flow control operations in the transport layer.","PeriodicalId":305776,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks (i-span 2008)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handoff Performance Comparison of Mobile IP, Fast Handoff and mSCTP in Mobile Wireless Networks\",\"authors\":\"Ken C. K. Tsang, Cho-Li Wang, F. Lau\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/I-SPAN.2008.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compare the performance of three handoff protocols, namely Mobile IP, Fast Handoff and mSCTP. Among the three schemes, Mobile IP suffers from the lowest data throughput and longest handoff latency. Fast Handoff can perform better, provided that the mobile node can handoff to the new base station at an appropriate time instant when data forwarding between network routers begins. mSCTP supports multihoming; the mobile node does not need to determine the exact handoff time. Nevertheless, packet reordering and the subsequent fast retransmission degrades its handoff performance. To avoid these problems, adding some flow control operations in the transport layer is necessary. Flow control should be carried out in-sync with the handoff operations. This implies the transport layer should additionally recognise when do the handoff procedures start or finish. We therefore come up with a natural choice in designing a handoff scheme, which is to centralise the handoff and flow control operations in the transport layer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks (i-span 2008)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks (i-span 2008)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SPAN.2008.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks (i-span 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SPAN.2008.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

我们比较了三种切换协议的性能,即移动IP,快速切换和mSCTP。三种方案中,移动IP方案的数据吞吐量最低,切换时延最长。如果移动节点能够在网络路由器之间的数据转发开始的适当时刻切换到新的基站,那么Fast Handoff的性能会更好。mSCTP支持多宿主;移动节点不需要确定确切的切换时间。然而,分组重排序和随后的快速重传降低了它的切换性能。为了避免这些问题,有必要在传输层中添加一些流控制操作。流量控制应与切换操作同步进行。这意味着传输层还应该识别切换过程何时开始或结束。因此,我们在设计切换方案时提出了一个自然的选择,即在传输层集中切换和流控制操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Handoff Performance Comparison of Mobile IP, Fast Handoff and mSCTP in Mobile Wireless Networks
We compare the performance of three handoff protocols, namely Mobile IP, Fast Handoff and mSCTP. Among the three schemes, Mobile IP suffers from the lowest data throughput and longest handoff latency. Fast Handoff can perform better, provided that the mobile node can handoff to the new base station at an appropriate time instant when data forwarding between network routers begins. mSCTP supports multihoming; the mobile node does not need to determine the exact handoff time. Nevertheless, packet reordering and the subsequent fast retransmission degrades its handoff performance. To avoid these problems, adding some flow control operations in the transport layer is necessary. Flow control should be carried out in-sync with the handoff operations. This implies the transport layer should additionally recognise when do the handoff procedures start or finish. We therefore come up with a natural choice in designing a handoff scheme, which is to centralise the handoff and flow control operations in the transport layer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信