超声与光学生物测量预测超声乳化术后预后的比较

Zia ul Mazhry, F. Hassan, M. Abdullah, Laiba Asif
{"title":"超声与光学生物测量预测超声乳化术后预后的比较","authors":"Zia ul Mazhry, F. Hassan, M. Abdullah, Laiba Asif","doi":"10.36351/pjo.v39i2.1504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:  To compare postoperative refractive outcomes predicted by ultrasonic and optical biometry after phacoemulsification.\nStudy Design:  Descriptive observational.\nPlace and Duration of Study:  WAPDA Teaching Hospital and Acuity Eye Center in Lahore Pakistan from January 2022 to May 2022.\nMethods:  The study included 59 eyes with cataracts and required phacoemulsification and implantation of a foldable intraocular lens. They were divided into two groups; (29 in the ultrasonic biometry group and 30 in the optical biometry group). The first group was subjected to ultrasound biometry, whereas the second was subjected to optical biometry. We compared ocular refractions following cataract surgery in two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the mean absolute refractive error (MAE). The operating surgeon was the same in both the groups.\nResults:  All the participants were between 40 and 70 years of age. The preoperative mean target refraction in the ultrasonic group was 0.05 ± 0.13D (range: -0.01 to + 0.17D) and 0.12 ± 0.33D in the optical group (range:-0.01 to +0.49D). Thus, there was a non-significant difference between both groups regarding target refraction(P = 0.58, U = 398.5). The MAE measured for the first group was 0.14 ± 0.46D and for the second group was 0.60 ± 0.53D. The comparison between both the biometry procedures showed that the difference was non-significant between the biometry methods (P = 0.430).\nConclusion:  The difference between Post-Operative MAE of patients undergoing two different biometry procedures (Optical and Ultrasonic) after cataract surgery was non-significant at P > 0.05.","PeriodicalId":169886,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"200 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Post-Operative Outcomes Predicted By Ultrasonic and Optic Biometry after Phacoemulsification\",\"authors\":\"Zia ul Mazhry, F. Hassan, M. Abdullah, Laiba Asif\",\"doi\":\"10.36351/pjo.v39i2.1504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose:  To compare postoperative refractive outcomes predicted by ultrasonic and optical biometry after phacoemulsification.\\nStudy Design:  Descriptive observational.\\nPlace and Duration of Study:  WAPDA Teaching Hospital and Acuity Eye Center in Lahore Pakistan from January 2022 to May 2022.\\nMethods:  The study included 59 eyes with cataracts and required phacoemulsification and implantation of a foldable intraocular lens. They were divided into two groups; (29 in the ultrasonic biometry group and 30 in the optical biometry group). The first group was subjected to ultrasound biometry, whereas the second was subjected to optical biometry. We compared ocular refractions following cataract surgery in two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the mean absolute refractive error (MAE). The operating surgeon was the same in both the groups.\\nResults:  All the participants were between 40 and 70 years of age. The preoperative mean target refraction in the ultrasonic group was 0.05 ± 0.13D (range: -0.01 to + 0.17D) and 0.12 ± 0.33D in the optical group (range:-0.01 to +0.49D). Thus, there was a non-significant difference between both groups regarding target refraction(P = 0.58, U = 398.5). The MAE measured for the first group was 0.14 ± 0.46D and for the second group was 0.60 ± 0.53D. The comparison between both the biometry procedures showed that the difference was non-significant between the biometry methods (P = 0.430).\\nConclusion:  The difference between Post-Operative MAE of patients undergoing two different biometry procedures (Optical and Ultrasonic) after cataract surgery was non-significant at P > 0.05.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"200 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i2.1504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i2.1504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较超声与光学生物测量对超声乳化术后屈光结果的预测。研究设计:描述性观察性。学习地点和时间:2022年1月至2022年5月,巴基斯坦拉合尔的WAPDA教学医院和视力中心。方法:对59眼白内障行超声乳化术和可折叠人工晶体植入术的患者进行研究。他们被分为两组;(超声生物测量组29例,光学生物测量组30例)。第一组接受超声生物测定,第二组接受光学生物测定。我们比较了两组白内障手术后的屈光。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较平均绝对屈光不正(MAE)。两组的手术医生是一样的。结果:所有参与者年龄在40 ~ 70岁之间。超声组术前平均靶屈光度为0.05±0.13D(范围:-0.01 ~ + 0.17D),光学组术前平均靶屈光度为0.12±0.33D(范围:-0.01 ~ +0.49D)。因此,两组在目标折射方面无显著差异(P = 0.58, U = 398.5)。第一组MAE为0.14±0.46D,第二组MAE为0.60±0.53D。两种生物测量方法的比较表明,两种生物测量方法之间的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.430)。结论:白内障术后采用光学和超声两种不同生物测量方法的患者术后MAE差异无统计学意义,P > 0.05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Post-Operative Outcomes Predicted By Ultrasonic and Optic Biometry after Phacoemulsification
Purpose:  To compare postoperative refractive outcomes predicted by ultrasonic and optical biometry after phacoemulsification. Study Design:  Descriptive observational. Place and Duration of Study:  WAPDA Teaching Hospital and Acuity Eye Center in Lahore Pakistan from January 2022 to May 2022. Methods:  The study included 59 eyes with cataracts and required phacoemulsification and implantation of a foldable intraocular lens. They were divided into two groups; (29 in the ultrasonic biometry group and 30 in the optical biometry group). The first group was subjected to ultrasound biometry, whereas the second was subjected to optical biometry. We compared ocular refractions following cataract surgery in two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the mean absolute refractive error (MAE). The operating surgeon was the same in both the groups. Results:  All the participants were between 40 and 70 years of age. The preoperative mean target refraction in the ultrasonic group was 0.05 ± 0.13D (range: -0.01 to + 0.17D) and 0.12 ± 0.33D in the optical group (range:-0.01 to +0.49D). Thus, there was a non-significant difference between both groups regarding target refraction(P = 0.58, U = 398.5). The MAE measured for the first group was 0.14 ± 0.46D and for the second group was 0.60 ± 0.53D. The comparison between both the biometry procedures showed that the difference was non-significant between the biometry methods (P = 0.430). Conclusion:  The difference between Post-Operative MAE of patients undergoing two different biometry procedures (Optical and Ultrasonic) after cataract surgery was non-significant at P > 0.05.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信