特定领域:二元决策?

DSM '10 Pub Date : 2010-10-17 DOI:10.1145/2060329.2060357
Markus Voelter, B. Merkle
{"title":"特定领域:二元决策?","authors":"Markus Voelter, B. Merkle","doi":"10.1145/2060329.2060357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often considered a binary decision whether something is domain specific or not. Consequently, there are domain specific languages (DSL) and general purpose languages (GPL), there are domain specific and non-domain specific modeling tools, there are domain specific and non-domain specific methodologies etc. In this paper we argue, that domain specificity is not a hard decision, but rather one extreme on a continuum. We also argue that many systems can be more efficiently described with a mix of domain specific and non-domain specific abstractions. This view of the world has consequences for languages, tools and methodologies, specifically the ability to modularize and compose languages. Additionally we outline these consequences and provide an extensive example based on embedded systems.","PeriodicalId":132950,"journal":{"name":"DSM '10","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Domain specific: a binary decision?\",\"authors\":\"Markus Voelter, B. Merkle\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2060329.2060357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is often considered a binary decision whether something is domain specific or not. Consequently, there are domain specific languages (DSL) and general purpose languages (GPL), there are domain specific and non-domain specific modeling tools, there are domain specific and non-domain specific methodologies etc. In this paper we argue, that domain specificity is not a hard decision, but rather one extreme on a continuum. We also argue that many systems can be more efficiently described with a mix of domain specific and non-domain specific abstractions. This view of the world has consequences for languages, tools and methodologies, specifically the ability to modularize and compose languages. Additionally we outline these consequences and provide an extensive example based on embedded systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DSM '10\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DSM '10\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2060329.2060357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DSM '10","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2060329.2060357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

它通常被认为是一个二元决策是否特定于领域。因此,有领域特定语言(DSL)和通用语言(GPL),有领域特定和非领域特定的建模工具,有领域特定和非领域特定的方法等。在本文中,我们认为,领域特异性不是一个艰难的决定,而是一个连续体的一个极端。我们还认为,许多系统可以更有效地描述特定于领域和非特定于领域的抽象的混合。这种世界观影响了语言、工具和方法论,特别是模块化和组合语言的能力。此外,我们概述了这些结果,并提供了一个基于嵌入式系统的广泛示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Domain specific: a binary decision?
It is often considered a binary decision whether something is domain specific or not. Consequently, there are domain specific languages (DSL) and general purpose languages (GPL), there are domain specific and non-domain specific modeling tools, there are domain specific and non-domain specific methodologies etc. In this paper we argue, that domain specificity is not a hard decision, but rather one extreme on a continuum. We also argue that many systems can be more efficiently described with a mix of domain specific and non-domain specific abstractions. This view of the world has consequences for languages, tools and methodologies, specifically the ability to modularize and compose languages. Additionally we outline these consequences and provide an extensive example based on embedded systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信