“市场中性”对冲基金真的是市场中性吗?

Andrew J. Patton
{"title":"“市场中性”对冲基金真的是市场中性吗?","authors":"Andrew J. Patton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.557096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One can consider the concept of market neutrality as having \"breadth\" and \"depth\": \"Breadth\" reflects the number of market risks to which the hedge fund is neutral, while \"depth\" reflects the \"completeness\" of the neutrality of the fund to market risks. We focus on market neutrality depth, and propose five different neutrality concepts for hedge funds. \"Mean neutrality\" nests the standard correlation-based defnition of neutrality. \"Variance neutrality\", \"Value-at-Risk neutrality\" and \"tail neutrality\" all relate to the neutrality of the risk of the hedge fund to market risks. Finally, \"complete neutrality\" corresponds to independence of the fund to market risks. We suggest statistical tests for each neutrality concept, and apply the tests to a combined database of monthly \"market neutral\" hedge fund returns from the HFR and TASS hedge fund databases. We find that between one-quarter and one-third of these funds exhibit some significant exposure to market risk.","PeriodicalId":411978,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings (Archive)","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are 'Market Neutral' Hedge Funds Really Market Neutral?\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Patton\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.557096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One can consider the concept of market neutrality as having \\\"breadth\\\" and \\\"depth\\\": \\\"Breadth\\\" reflects the number of market risks to which the hedge fund is neutral, while \\\"depth\\\" reflects the \\\"completeness\\\" of the neutrality of the fund to market risks. We focus on market neutrality depth, and propose five different neutrality concepts for hedge funds. \\\"Mean neutrality\\\" nests the standard correlation-based defnition of neutrality. \\\"Variance neutrality\\\", \\\"Value-at-Risk neutrality\\\" and \\\"tail neutrality\\\" all relate to the neutrality of the risk of the hedge fund to market risks. Finally, \\\"complete neutrality\\\" corresponds to independence of the fund to market risks. We suggest statistical tests for each neutrality concept, and apply the tests to a combined database of monthly \\\"market neutral\\\" hedge fund returns from the HFR and TASS hedge fund databases. We find that between one-quarter and one-third of these funds exhibit some significant exposure to market risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings (Archive)\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.557096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.557096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

我们可以将市场中立的概念理解为具有“广度”和“深度”:“广度”反映对冲基金对市场风险保持中立的数量,而“深度”反映基金对市场风险保持中立的“完整性”。我们关注市场中立的深度,并为对冲基金提出了五种不同的中立概念。“平均中立性”包含了标准的基于相关性的中立性定义。“方差中立性”、“风险价值中立性”和“尾部中立性”都与对冲基金风险对市场风险的中立性有关。最后,“完全中立”对应于基金对市场风险的独立。我们建议对每个中性概念进行统计测试,并将测试应用于HFR和TASS对冲基金数据库中每月“市场中性”对冲基金回报的组合数据库。我们发现,在这些基金中,有四分之一到三分之一表现出一定程度的市场风险敞口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are 'Market Neutral' Hedge Funds Really Market Neutral?
One can consider the concept of market neutrality as having "breadth" and "depth": "Breadth" reflects the number of market risks to which the hedge fund is neutral, while "depth" reflects the "completeness" of the neutrality of the fund to market risks. We focus on market neutrality depth, and propose five different neutrality concepts for hedge funds. "Mean neutrality" nests the standard correlation-based defnition of neutrality. "Variance neutrality", "Value-at-Risk neutrality" and "tail neutrality" all relate to the neutrality of the risk of the hedge fund to market risks. Finally, "complete neutrality" corresponds to independence of the fund to market risks. We suggest statistical tests for each neutrality concept, and apply the tests to a combined database of monthly "market neutral" hedge fund returns from the HFR and TASS hedge fund databases. We find that between one-quarter and one-third of these funds exhibit some significant exposure to market risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信