{"title":"行政程序中算法的使用:从欧洲法的角度比较各国的经验","authors":"Matteo Pressi","doi":"10.7590/187479821x16254887670900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze, from a comparative perspective, the main elements of the discipline on the use of algorithms within administrative procedures developed by the national lawmakers of France, Spain and Italy. Furthermore, the article intends to verify, on the basis of the principle\n of good administration, the existence of a minimum core of guarantees addressed to the citizen who is the recipient of an automated decision.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Algorithms within Administrative Procedures: National Experiences compared through the Lens of European Law\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Pressi\",\"doi\":\"10.7590/187479821x16254887670900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to analyze, from a comparative perspective, the main elements of the discipline on the use of algorithms within administrative procedures developed by the national lawmakers of France, Spain and Italy. Furthermore, the article intends to verify, on the basis of the principle\\n of good administration, the existence of a minimum core of guarantees addressed to the citizen who is the recipient of an automated decision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479821x16254887670900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479821x16254887670900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Use of Algorithms within Administrative Procedures: National Experiences compared through the Lens of European Law
This paper aims to analyze, from a comparative perspective, the main elements of the discipline on the use of algorithms within administrative procedures developed by the national lawmakers of France, Spain and Italy. Furthermore, the article intends to verify, on the basis of the principle
of good administration, the existence of a minimum core of guarantees addressed to the citizen who is the recipient of an automated decision.