多旋翼无人机轨迹跟踪预测控制结构设计

Robinson S. Alvarez-Valle, P. Rivadeneira
{"title":"多旋翼无人机轨迹跟踪预测控制结构设计","authors":"Robinson S. Alvarez-Valle, P. Rivadeneira","doi":"10.1109/CCAC.2019.8921205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the synthesis of four model predictive controllers for a multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle to track trajectories. Three control structures are used to control the state variables: x, y, z positions and the yaw angle. For the first structure, a centralized control loop is used and two control strategies are proposed. The first strategy uses the outputs described above, while the second one increases the outputs with the state variables: roll and pitch angles. The second and third control structures use a non-centralized control loop. The second one splits the control loop into a cascade structure with a master and a slave loops. The last structure combines a master model predictive control strategy with a slave PD-P control combination. In both cases, the slave loop controls the new reference state variables roll and pitch angles, given by the master loop. The development of each controller is accomplished by changing the set points and is later tested by tracking a square trajectory. For a 1 [m] step change in x or y position, the system response has a setting time of around 1.44 [s], 1. 45[s], and 2.74 [s], with an overshooting of approximately 1.4%, 0% and 2.2% for each structure, respectively. For a 1 [m] change in z position, the setting time is 1.94 [s] and the overshoot is 2.88% for the first two structures. While for the last one, the setting time is 3 [s] without overshoot. For a half turn change of the yaw angle, the setting time is 1.74 [s] for the first two structures and 4.16 [s] for the last one, all of them without overshoot. Finally, disturbances are included to test the robustness of the control strategies tracking a square trajectory. Based on these results, the conclusion is that the first and second structures have the best performance.","PeriodicalId":184764,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 4th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of Predictive Control Structures to Track Trajectories for Multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle\",\"authors\":\"Robinson S. Alvarez-Valle, P. Rivadeneira\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCAC.2019.8921205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the synthesis of four model predictive controllers for a multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle to track trajectories. Three control structures are used to control the state variables: x, y, z positions and the yaw angle. For the first structure, a centralized control loop is used and two control strategies are proposed. The first strategy uses the outputs described above, while the second one increases the outputs with the state variables: roll and pitch angles. The second and third control structures use a non-centralized control loop. The second one splits the control loop into a cascade structure with a master and a slave loops. The last structure combines a master model predictive control strategy with a slave PD-P control combination. In both cases, the slave loop controls the new reference state variables roll and pitch angles, given by the master loop. The development of each controller is accomplished by changing the set points and is later tested by tracking a square trajectory. For a 1 [m] step change in x or y position, the system response has a setting time of around 1.44 [s], 1. 45[s], and 2.74 [s], with an overshooting of approximately 1.4%, 0% and 2.2% for each structure, respectively. For a 1 [m] change in z position, the setting time is 1.94 [s] and the overshoot is 2.88% for the first two structures. While for the last one, the setting time is 3 [s] without overshoot. For a half turn change of the yaw angle, the setting time is 1.74 [s] for the first two structures and 4.16 [s] for the last one, all of them without overshoot. Finally, disturbances are included to test the robustness of the control strategies tracking a square trajectory. Based on these results, the conclusion is that the first and second structures have the best performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 4th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 4th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2019.8921205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 4th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2019.8921205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对多旋翼无人机的轨迹跟踪问题,提出了四种模型预测控制器的综合方法。三种控制结构用于控制状态变量:x, y, z位置和偏航角。对于第一种结构,采用集中控制回路,并提出了两种控制策略。第一种策略使用上面描述的输出,而第二种策略使用状态变量:滚转角和俯仰角来增加输出。第二和第三控制结构使用非集中控制回路。第二种方法是将控制回路分解为具有主回路和从回路的级联结构。最后一种结构将主模型预测控制策略与从模型PD-P控制组合相结合。在这两种情况下,从环控制新的参考状态变量滚转和俯仰角,由主环给出。每个控制器的开发都是通过改变设定点来完成的,然后通过跟踪正方形轨迹进行测试。对于x或y位置的1 [m]阶跃变化,系统响应的设定时间约为1.44 [s], 1。45[s]和2.74 [s],每种结构的超调幅度分别约为1.4%、0%和2.2%。当z位置变化1 [m]时,前两种结构的凝固时间为1.94 [s],超调量为2.88%。最后一个设定时间为3 [s],无超调。对于半转偏航角变化,前两种结构的设置时间为1.74 [s],后一种结构的设置时间为4.16 [s],均无超调。最后,为了验证控制策略跟踪方形轨迹的鲁棒性,引入了干扰。基于这些结果,得出第一和第二结构具有最佳性能的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design of Predictive Control Structures to Track Trajectories for Multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
This paper presents the synthesis of four model predictive controllers for a multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle to track trajectories. Three control structures are used to control the state variables: x, y, z positions and the yaw angle. For the first structure, a centralized control loop is used and two control strategies are proposed. The first strategy uses the outputs described above, while the second one increases the outputs with the state variables: roll and pitch angles. The second and third control structures use a non-centralized control loop. The second one splits the control loop into a cascade structure with a master and a slave loops. The last structure combines a master model predictive control strategy with a slave PD-P control combination. In both cases, the slave loop controls the new reference state variables roll and pitch angles, given by the master loop. The development of each controller is accomplished by changing the set points and is later tested by tracking a square trajectory. For a 1 [m] step change in x or y position, the system response has a setting time of around 1.44 [s], 1. 45[s], and 2.74 [s], with an overshooting of approximately 1.4%, 0% and 2.2% for each structure, respectively. For a 1 [m] change in z position, the setting time is 1.94 [s] and the overshoot is 2.88% for the first two structures. While for the last one, the setting time is 3 [s] without overshoot. For a half turn change of the yaw angle, the setting time is 1.74 [s] for the first two structures and 4.16 [s] for the last one, all of them without overshoot. Finally, disturbances are included to test the robustness of the control strategies tracking a square trajectory. Based on these results, the conclusion is that the first and second structures have the best performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信