Wajah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-10-14 DOI:10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1081
Mona Wulandari, Saifullah Basri
{"title":"Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Syariah di indonesia","authors":"Mona Wulandari, Saifullah Basri","doi":"10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 093/PUU-X/2012, the quo vadis regarding the dualism of the authority to settle sharia economic disputes has ended. The Religious Courts are legally constitutional as the only institution authorized to resolve sharia economic disputes through litigation. However, this authority is not fully implemented, there are still other sharia economic disputes whose resolution is decided by the Commercial Court within the scope of the General Courts, namely bankruptcy disputes and PKPU (Debt Payment Obligations Suspension) in Islamic financial institutions. So after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 93/PUU-X/2012, the litigation resolution of sharia banking disputes is handled by the Religious Courts, while non-litigation is handled by arbitration and other alternative dispute resolutions. Arbitration in this case is the National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS) while other alternative dispute resolutions are resolved through dispute resolution agreements based on good faith.","PeriodicalId":283705,"journal":{"name":"Wajah Hukum","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wajah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第093/PUU-X/2012号宪法法院判决发布后,关于解决伊斯兰经济纠纷的权力二元论的现状已经结束。宗教法院作为唯一被授权通过诉讼解决伊斯兰经济纠纷的机构,在法律上是符合宪法的。然而,这一权力并未得到充分执行,还存在其他伊斯兰经济纠纷,其解决由商业法庭在普通法院范围内决定,即伊斯兰金融机构的破产纠纷和PKPU(债务支付义务暂停)。因此,在宪法法院第93/PUU-X/2012号决定之后,伊斯兰银行纠纷的诉讼解决由宗教法院处理,而非诉讼解决由仲裁和其他替代性争议解决方式处理。本案中的仲裁由国家伊斯兰教法仲裁委员会(BASYARNAS)进行,而其他替代性争议解决方案则通过基于诚信的争议解决协议来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Syariah di indonesia
After the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 093/PUU-X/2012, the quo vadis regarding the dualism of the authority to settle sharia economic disputes has ended. The Religious Courts are legally constitutional as the only institution authorized to resolve sharia economic disputes through litigation. However, this authority is not fully implemented, there are still other sharia economic disputes whose resolution is decided by the Commercial Court within the scope of the General Courts, namely bankruptcy disputes and PKPU (Debt Payment Obligations Suspension) in Islamic financial institutions. So after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 93/PUU-X/2012, the litigation resolution of sharia banking disputes is handled by the Religious Courts, while non-litigation is handled by arbitration and other alternative dispute resolutions. Arbitration in this case is the National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS) while other alternative dispute resolutions are resolved through dispute resolution agreements based on good faith.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信