美国与日本教师能力框架之比较

Onur Ergünay, Seth A. Parsons
{"title":"美国与日本教师能力框架之比较","authors":"Onur Ergünay, Seth A. Parsons","doi":"10.26522/jiste.v27i1.4165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching is a complex endeavor that requires deep knowledge of content, pedagogy, and students. Educational stakeholders design teacher competence frameworks to outline the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that teachers need to have to improve their teaching activity. These competence frameworks are guided by research and theory and tend to respond to local contexts and national efforts. In this article, we examine teacher competence frameworks in two national contexts, the United States of America and Türkiye, using Merriam’s (2009) approach to document analysis and Phillips and Schweisfurth’s (2014) framework for comparative inquiry. This analysis reveals much overlap but also distinct differences in educational structures. Our analysis is based upon four categories including overall structures, development, scope, and accountabilities of teacher competence frameworks. Given that the teacher competence frameworks in both countries are dated, we conclude our article with a call for updating such frameworks through participatory efforts, taking into account recent post-COVID pandemic needs in teacher competencies.","PeriodicalId":321615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Teacher Competence Frameworks in the USA and Türkiye\",\"authors\":\"Onur Ergünay, Seth A. Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.26522/jiste.v27i1.4165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teaching is a complex endeavor that requires deep knowledge of content, pedagogy, and students. Educational stakeholders design teacher competence frameworks to outline the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that teachers need to have to improve their teaching activity. These competence frameworks are guided by research and theory and tend to respond to local contexts and national efforts. In this article, we examine teacher competence frameworks in two national contexts, the United States of America and Türkiye, using Merriam’s (2009) approach to document analysis and Phillips and Schweisfurth’s (2014) framework for comparative inquiry. This analysis reveals much overlap but also distinct differences in educational structures. Our analysis is based upon four categories including overall structures, development, scope, and accountabilities of teacher competence frameworks. Given that the teacher competence frameworks in both countries are dated, we conclude our article with a call for updating such frameworks through participatory efforts, taking into account recent post-COVID pandemic needs in teacher competencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26522/jiste.v27i1.4165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26522/jiste.v27i1.4165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教学是一项复杂的工作,需要对教学内容、教学方法和学生有深入的了解。教育利益相关者设计教师能力框架,概述教师需要具备的知识、技能和性格,以提高他们的教学活动。这些能力框架以研究和理论为指导,并倾向于对当地情况和国家努力作出反应。在本文中,我们使用Merriam(2009)的方法进行文献分析,使用Phillips和Schweisfurth(2014)的框架进行比较调查,研究了两个国家背景下的教师能力框架,即美国和新西兰。这一分析揭示了教育结构上的许多重叠,但也有明显的差异。我们的分析基于四个类别,包括教师能力框架的总体结构、发展、范围和责任。鉴于这两个国家的教师能力框架已经过时,我们在文章的最后呼吁通过参与性努力更新这些框架,同时考虑到covid - 19大流行后最近对教师能力的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Teacher Competence Frameworks in the USA and Türkiye
Teaching is a complex endeavor that requires deep knowledge of content, pedagogy, and students. Educational stakeholders design teacher competence frameworks to outline the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that teachers need to have to improve their teaching activity. These competence frameworks are guided by research and theory and tend to respond to local contexts and national efforts. In this article, we examine teacher competence frameworks in two national contexts, the United States of America and Türkiye, using Merriam’s (2009) approach to document analysis and Phillips and Schweisfurth’s (2014) framework for comparative inquiry. This analysis reveals much overlap but also distinct differences in educational structures. Our analysis is based upon four categories including overall structures, development, scope, and accountabilities of teacher competence frameworks. Given that the teacher competence frameworks in both countries are dated, we conclude our article with a call for updating such frameworks through participatory efforts, taking into account recent post-COVID pandemic needs in teacher competencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信