移动Ad Hoc网络中被动和主动路由协议性能比较研究

C. Mbarushimana, A. Shahrabi
{"title":"移动Ad Hoc网络中被动和主动路由协议性能比较研究","authors":"C. Mbarushimana, A. Shahrabi","doi":"10.1109/AINAW.2007.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mobility of nodes in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) results in frequent changes of network topology making routing in MANETs a challenging task. Some studies have been reported in the literature to evaluate the performance of the proposed routing algorithms. However, since the publication of experimental standards for some routing protocols by IETF, little activity has been done to contrast the performance of reactive against proactive protocols. This paper evaluates the performance of reactive (AODV, DSR) and proactive (OLSR) routing protocols in MANETs under CBR traffic with different network conditions. Our results, contrarily to previously reported studies conducted on the same routing protocols, show the superiority of proactive over reactive protocols in routing such traffic at the cost of a higher routing load.","PeriodicalId":338799,"journal":{"name":"21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"310","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols Performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks\",\"authors\":\"C. Mbarushimana, A. Shahrabi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AINAW.2007.123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mobility of nodes in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) results in frequent changes of network topology making routing in MANETs a challenging task. Some studies have been reported in the literature to evaluate the performance of the proposed routing algorithms. However, since the publication of experimental standards for some routing protocols by IETF, little activity has been done to contrast the performance of reactive against proactive protocols. This paper evaluates the performance of reactive (AODV, DSR) and proactive (OLSR) routing protocols in MANETs under CBR traffic with different network conditions. Our results, contrarily to previously reported studies conducted on the same routing protocols, show the superiority of proactive over reactive protocols in routing such traffic at the cost of a higher routing load.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"310\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AINAW.2007.123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AINAW.2007.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 310

摘要

移动自组网(manet)中节点的移动性导致网络拓扑结构的频繁变化,使得在manet中路由成为一项具有挑战性的任务。文献中已经报道了一些研究来评估所提出的路由算法的性能。然而,自从IETF发布了一些路由协议的实验标准以来,很少有活动来对比被动协议和主动协议的性能。本文在不同的网络条件下,对manet中被动路由协议(AODV、DSR)和主动路由协议(OLSR)的性能进行了评估。我们的结果,与之前报道的对相同路由协议进行的研究相反,显示了以更高的路由负载为代价的主动路由优于被动路由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols Performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
The mobility of nodes in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) results in frequent changes of network topology making routing in MANETs a challenging task. Some studies have been reported in the literature to evaluate the performance of the proposed routing algorithms. However, since the publication of experimental standards for some routing protocols by IETF, little activity has been done to contrast the performance of reactive against proactive protocols. This paper evaluates the performance of reactive (AODV, DSR) and proactive (OLSR) routing protocols in MANETs under CBR traffic with different network conditions. Our results, contrarily to previously reported studies conducted on the same routing protocols, show the superiority of proactive over reactive protocols in routing such traffic at the cost of a higher routing load.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信