尼日利亚,民主和经济

Ayo Teriba
{"title":"尼日利亚,民主和经济","authors":"Ayo Teriba","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2438947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nigeria fortuitously instituted democratic rule at home at a time of growing economic and financial ease abroad. A decade and a half down the road, it is clear that elected democrats have been at a loss on how to deliver economic outcomes commensurate with the global stimuli. Unemployment and poverty levels have worsened in the face of high growth and high liquidity. A democratic deficit has emerged as elected officials pass the buck of policy conception, design and coordination to unelected appointees that should ideally only implement. There is a divergence between conferment of powers through elections and the ability to exercise such powers between elections. On the eve of Nigeria’s fifth general elections, global economic and financial situations are favourable, and seem set to remain so in the foreseeable future. Thus, in spite of past misses, the window of opportunity for Nigeria’s democracy to deliver stronger economic outcomes remains open. The 470 persons Nigeria elects every four years now have to be equipped to achieve a stronger link between favourable global economic and financial stimuli and domestic economic outcomes. Specifically, Nigeria now needs to embed strong policy making institutions in her fledgling democratic transition by redefining the roles that elected officials must play in economic management, equipping them to play such roles, and setting out the rules by which such roles must be played in explicit new pieces of legislation. We suggest five aspects of the economic management processes that must be reformed to overcome the huge democratic deficit in the Nigerian transition and ensure that the next decade and a half of Nigeria’s democratic transition yields better economic outcomes than the initial decade and a half. a) First, until we know the facts about the economy in a timely fashion, it will be difficult to know when or how to boost economic outcomes, however well meaning we may be. There is a need for government to ensure that all agencies charged with responsibility to provide any type of economic data do so in a timely and orderly fashion, preferably on pre-announced due dates to ensure predictability. The President and the Parliament need to ensure that data provision mandates/legislation are updated to include comprehensive calendar and ensure sufficient funding is appropriated for data providing agencies. b) Second, once necessary data are provided, Nigeria needs to have a neutral national economic intelligence agency to generate a central view of the trends and outlook of the key aspects of the economy, and provide the insights into ways to improve economic outcomes, oversight of national policies and programs, and foresight into long-term future economic trends, required to ensure that President, Parliament and all Agency Heads always stay focused on ways to make government work better. c) Third, to overcome the growing democratic deficit in which elected Presidents come into office to pass the buck of economic policy conception, design and coordination to unelected appointees that should ideally only implement, Nigeria henceforth needs to oblige elected Presidents by law to provide an annual written articulation of their thinking about where the economy is coming from, where it roughly is, and where it is heading to; assign specific roles and actions to elected presidents; and provide them the technical backing to be more effective in providing active leadership in economic policy formulation. Elected Presidents must be equipped to take responsibility for defining economic realities and required policies in formal statements to the Parliament on an annual basis. d) Fourth, to overcome the growing democratic deficit in which elected Parliaments merely pass the buck of policy economic policy conception and design to unelected appointees that should ideally only implement, Nigeria henceforth needs to oblige elected Parliaments by law to respond to the annual written articulation of the President on his thinking about where the economy is coming from, where it roughly is, and where it is heading to; assign specific roles and actions to elected Parliaments; and provide them the technical backing to be more capable to engage the President in economic policy formulation, articulate informed pre-legislative debate on the floor of the Parliament, and enact agenda-setting economic legislation. e) Fifth, Nigerian Parliament must also be equipped with access to the technical personnel and expertise required for exerting greater impact on economic policies and outcomes by holding the ministries, departments and the agencies to account, and promoting public understanding of policy choices. To ensure that Nigeria’s democracy becomes an effective means of actualizing the country’s huge economic potentials, it is important to push these issues to the forefront of national debate in the build up to Nigeria’s fifth general elections.","PeriodicalId":120850,"journal":{"name":"African Law eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nigeria, Democracy, and the Economy\",\"authors\":\"Ayo Teriba\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2438947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nigeria fortuitously instituted democratic rule at home at a time of growing economic and financial ease abroad. A decade and a half down the road, it is clear that elected democrats have been at a loss on how to deliver economic outcomes commensurate with the global stimuli. Unemployment and poverty levels have worsened in the face of high growth and high liquidity. A democratic deficit has emerged as elected officials pass the buck of policy conception, design and coordination to unelected appointees that should ideally only implement. There is a divergence between conferment of powers through elections and the ability to exercise such powers between elections. On the eve of Nigeria’s fifth general elections, global economic and financial situations are favourable, and seem set to remain so in the foreseeable future. Thus, in spite of past misses, the window of opportunity for Nigeria’s democracy to deliver stronger economic outcomes remains open. The 470 persons Nigeria elects every four years now have to be equipped to achieve a stronger link between favourable global economic and financial stimuli and domestic economic outcomes. Specifically, Nigeria now needs to embed strong policy making institutions in her fledgling democratic transition by redefining the roles that elected officials must play in economic management, equipping them to play such roles, and setting out the rules by which such roles must be played in explicit new pieces of legislation. We suggest five aspects of the economic management processes that must be reformed to overcome the huge democratic deficit in the Nigerian transition and ensure that the next decade and a half of Nigeria’s democratic transition yields better economic outcomes than the initial decade and a half. a) First, until we know the facts about the economy in a timely fashion, it will be difficult to know when or how to boost economic outcomes, however well meaning we may be. There is a need for government to ensure that all agencies charged with responsibility to provide any type of economic data do so in a timely and orderly fashion, preferably on pre-announced due dates to ensure predictability. The President and the Parliament need to ensure that data provision mandates/legislation are updated to include comprehensive calendar and ensure sufficient funding is appropriated for data providing agencies. b) Second, once necessary data are provided, Nigeria needs to have a neutral national economic intelligence agency to generate a central view of the trends and outlook of the key aspects of the economy, and provide the insights into ways to improve economic outcomes, oversight of national policies and programs, and foresight into long-term future economic trends, required to ensure that President, Parliament and all Agency Heads always stay focused on ways to make government work better. c) Third, to overcome the growing democratic deficit in which elected Presidents come into office to pass the buck of economic policy conception, design and coordination to unelected appointees that should ideally only implement, Nigeria henceforth needs to oblige elected Presidents by law to provide an annual written articulation of their thinking about where the economy is coming from, where it roughly is, and where it is heading to; assign specific roles and actions to elected presidents; and provide them the technical backing to be more effective in providing active leadership in economic policy formulation. Elected Presidents must be equipped to take responsibility for defining economic realities and required policies in formal statements to the Parliament on an annual basis. d) Fourth, to overcome the growing democratic deficit in which elected Parliaments merely pass the buck of policy economic policy conception and design to unelected appointees that should ideally only implement, Nigeria henceforth needs to oblige elected Parliaments by law to respond to the annual written articulation of the President on his thinking about where the economy is coming from, where it roughly is, and where it is heading to; assign specific roles and actions to elected Parliaments; and provide them the technical backing to be more capable to engage the President in economic policy formulation, articulate informed pre-legislative debate on the floor of the Parliament, and enact agenda-setting economic legislation. e) Fifth, Nigerian Parliament must also be equipped with access to the technical personnel and expertise required for exerting greater impact on economic policies and outcomes by holding the ministries, departments and the agencies to account, and promoting public understanding of policy choices. To ensure that Nigeria’s democracy becomes an effective means of actualizing the country’s huge economic potentials, it is important to push these issues to the forefront of national debate in the build up to Nigeria’s fifth general elections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2438947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2438947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尼日利亚在国外经济和金融日益宽松的时候,幸运地在国内建立了民主统治。15年过去了,很明显,当选的民主党人在如何实现与全球刺激措施相称的经济成果方面一直无所适从。面对高增长和高流动性,失业和贫困水平进一步恶化。民选官员将政策构想、设计和协调的责任推给了非民选任命的官员,这导致了民主赤字的出现,而理想情况下,这些任命应该只负责执行。在通过选举授予权力和在两次选举之间行使这种权力的能力之间存在分歧。在尼日利亚第五次大选前夕,全球经济和金融形势是有利的,而且在可预见的未来似乎将继续如此。因此,尽管过去失败了,但尼日利亚民主实现更强劲经济成果的机会之窗仍然敞开。尼日利亚每四年选举一次的470人现在必须具备在有利的全球经济和财政刺激与国内经济成果之间实现更强联系的能力。具体来说,尼日利亚现在需要通过重新定义民选官员在经济管理中必须扮演的角色,为他们提供发挥这些角色的装备,并在明确的新立法中制定这些角色必须发挥的规则,在其刚刚起步的民主转型中嵌入强大的政策制定机构。我们建议必须改革经济管理进程的五个方面,以克服尼日利亚转型中巨大的民主赤字,并确保尼日利亚民主转型的下一个15年产生比最初15年更好的经济成果。a)首先,在我们及时了解经济事实之前,很难知道何时或如何提振经济成果,无论我们的本意多么好。政府有必要确保所有负责提供任何类型经济数据的机构及时有序地提供数据,最好是在预先宣布的截止日期提供数据,以确保可预测性。总统和议会需要确保更新数据提供授权/立法,以包括全面的日历,并确保为数据提供机构拨出足够的资金。b)其次,一旦提供了必要的数据,尼日利亚需要有一个中立的国家经济情报机构,以产生对经济关键方面的趋势和前景的中心观点,并提供对改善经济成果的方法的见解,对国家政策和计划的监督,以及对未来长期经济趋势的预见,这是确保总统,议会和所有机构负责人始终专注于使政府更好地工作的方法所必需的。c)第三,为了克服日益严重的民主赤字,即当选总统上任后将经济政策构想、设计和协调的责任转嫁给未经选举的被任命者,而这些被任命者在理想情况下只应执行,尼日利亚今后需要通过法律强制当选总统每年提供一份书面声明,说明他们对经济来源、大致位置和走向的思考;给当选的总裁分配具体的角色和行动;并为他们提供技术支持,使他们更有效地在制定经济政策方面发挥积极的领导作用。当选的总统必须具备在每年向议会发表的正式声明中确定经济现实和所需政策的能力。d)第四,为了克服日益严重的民主赤字,在这种赤字中,当选的议会仅仅将政策的责任、经济政策的概念和设计推卸给非选举产生的任命者,而这些政策和设计在理想情况下只应该执行,尼日利亚今后需要通过法律强制选举产生的议会对总统关于他对经济来自何处、大致在何处以及走向何处的想法的年度书面表述作出回应;指定选举产生的议会的具体作用和行动;并为他们提供技术支持,使他们更有能力参与总统的经济政策制定,在议会的立法前辩论中表达清楚,制定议程设定经济立法。e)第五,尼日利亚议会还必须配备所需的技术人员和专业知识,以便通过追究各部委、部门和机构的责任,促进公众对政策选择的理解,对经济政策和结果产生更大的影响。为了确保尼日利亚的民主成为实现该国巨大经济潜力的有效手段,重要的是在尼日利亚第五次大选之前将这些问题推向全国辩论的前沿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nigeria, Democracy, and the Economy
Nigeria fortuitously instituted democratic rule at home at a time of growing economic and financial ease abroad. A decade and a half down the road, it is clear that elected democrats have been at a loss on how to deliver economic outcomes commensurate with the global stimuli. Unemployment and poverty levels have worsened in the face of high growth and high liquidity. A democratic deficit has emerged as elected officials pass the buck of policy conception, design and coordination to unelected appointees that should ideally only implement. There is a divergence between conferment of powers through elections and the ability to exercise such powers between elections. On the eve of Nigeria’s fifth general elections, global economic and financial situations are favourable, and seem set to remain so in the foreseeable future. Thus, in spite of past misses, the window of opportunity for Nigeria’s democracy to deliver stronger economic outcomes remains open. The 470 persons Nigeria elects every four years now have to be equipped to achieve a stronger link between favourable global economic and financial stimuli and domestic economic outcomes. Specifically, Nigeria now needs to embed strong policy making institutions in her fledgling democratic transition by redefining the roles that elected officials must play in economic management, equipping them to play such roles, and setting out the rules by which such roles must be played in explicit new pieces of legislation. We suggest five aspects of the economic management processes that must be reformed to overcome the huge democratic deficit in the Nigerian transition and ensure that the next decade and a half of Nigeria’s democratic transition yields better economic outcomes than the initial decade and a half. a) First, until we know the facts about the economy in a timely fashion, it will be difficult to know when or how to boost economic outcomes, however well meaning we may be. There is a need for government to ensure that all agencies charged with responsibility to provide any type of economic data do so in a timely and orderly fashion, preferably on pre-announced due dates to ensure predictability. The President and the Parliament need to ensure that data provision mandates/legislation are updated to include comprehensive calendar and ensure sufficient funding is appropriated for data providing agencies. b) Second, once necessary data are provided, Nigeria needs to have a neutral national economic intelligence agency to generate a central view of the trends and outlook of the key aspects of the economy, and provide the insights into ways to improve economic outcomes, oversight of national policies and programs, and foresight into long-term future economic trends, required to ensure that President, Parliament and all Agency Heads always stay focused on ways to make government work better. c) Third, to overcome the growing democratic deficit in which elected Presidents come into office to pass the buck of economic policy conception, design and coordination to unelected appointees that should ideally only implement, Nigeria henceforth needs to oblige elected Presidents by law to provide an annual written articulation of their thinking about where the economy is coming from, where it roughly is, and where it is heading to; assign specific roles and actions to elected presidents; and provide them the technical backing to be more effective in providing active leadership in economic policy formulation. Elected Presidents must be equipped to take responsibility for defining economic realities and required policies in formal statements to the Parliament on an annual basis. d) Fourth, to overcome the growing democratic deficit in which elected Parliaments merely pass the buck of policy economic policy conception and design to unelected appointees that should ideally only implement, Nigeria henceforth needs to oblige elected Parliaments by law to respond to the annual written articulation of the President on his thinking about where the economy is coming from, where it roughly is, and where it is heading to; assign specific roles and actions to elected Parliaments; and provide them the technical backing to be more capable to engage the President in economic policy formulation, articulate informed pre-legislative debate on the floor of the Parliament, and enact agenda-setting economic legislation. e) Fifth, Nigerian Parliament must also be equipped with access to the technical personnel and expertise required for exerting greater impact on economic policies and outcomes by holding the ministries, departments and the agencies to account, and promoting public understanding of policy choices. To ensure that Nigeria’s democracy becomes an effective means of actualizing the country’s huge economic potentials, it is important to push these issues to the forefront of national debate in the build up to Nigeria’s fifth general elections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信