评估测试驱动开发的优势:专业人员的受控实验

G. Canfora, A. Cimitile, Félix García, M. Piattini, C. A. Visaggio
{"title":"评估测试驱动开发的优势:专业人员的受控实验","authors":"G. Canfora, A. Cimitile, Félix García, M. Piattini, C. A. Visaggio","doi":"10.1145/1159733.1159788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test driven development (TDD) is gaining interest among practitioners and researchers: it promises to increase the quality of the code. Even if TDD is considered a development practice, it relies on the use of unit testing. For this reason, it could be an alternative to the testing after coding (TAC), which is the usual approach to run and execute unit tests after having written the code. We wondered which are the differences between the two practices, from the standpoint of quality and productivity. In order to answer our research question, we carried out an experiment in a Spanish Software House. The results suggest that TDD improves the unit testing but slows down the overall process.","PeriodicalId":201305,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"88","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating advantages of test driven development: a controlled experiment with professionals\",\"authors\":\"G. Canfora, A. Cimitile, Félix García, M. Piattini, C. A. Visaggio\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1159733.1159788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Test driven development (TDD) is gaining interest among practitioners and researchers: it promises to increase the quality of the code. Even if TDD is considered a development practice, it relies on the use of unit testing. For this reason, it could be an alternative to the testing after coding (TAC), which is the usual approach to run and execute unit tests after having written the code. We wondered which are the differences between the two practices, from the standpoint of quality and productivity. In order to answer our research question, we carried out an experiment in a Spanish Software House. The results suggest that TDD improves the unit testing but slows down the overall process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"88\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1159733.1159788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1159733.1159788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

摘要

测试驱动开发(TDD)正引起实践者和研究人员的兴趣:它承诺提高代码的质量。即使TDD被认为是一种开发实践,它也依赖于单元测试的使用。由于这个原因,它可以替代编码后测试(TAC),后者是在编写代码后运行和执行单元测试的常用方法。我们想知道从质量和生产力的角度来看,这两种实践之间的区别是什么。为了回答我们的研究问题,我们在西班牙的一家软件屋进行了实验。结果表明,TDD改进了单元测试,但减慢了整个过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating advantages of test driven development: a controlled experiment with professionals
Test driven development (TDD) is gaining interest among practitioners and researchers: it promises to increase the quality of the code. Even if TDD is considered a development practice, it relies on the use of unit testing. For this reason, it could be an alternative to the testing after coding (TAC), which is the usual approach to run and execute unit tests after having written the code. We wondered which are the differences between the two practices, from the standpoint of quality and productivity. In order to answer our research question, we carried out an experiment in a Spanish Software House. The results suggest that TDD improves the unit testing but slows down the overall process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信