{"title":"书评:政治景观:自然的艺术史。作者:Martin Warnke伦敦,Reaktion Books, 1994。165页,纸质版12.95英镑。Isbn 0 948462 63 9","authors":"D. Cosgrove","doi":"10.1177/147447409700400216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For an anglophone reader familiar with the extensive critical literature on landscape in English, the title of this book raises many expectations. Within art history and beyond, landscape painting and design have come to be regarded as deeply political, because landscape is regarded as a way of seeing and representing the natural world, historically bound to the exercise of authority and power over land and territory. It comes therefore as a surprise to read in the book’s preface that ’art experts ... have totally eliminated the political element from landscape painting’ and the hope that the book ’will show that political pointers need not impair our appreciation and perception of the landscape, but actually sharpen them’ (pp. 7-8). Such a claim only makes sense in the specific context of the original German text. Martin Warnke is Professor of Art History at the University of Hamburg, and the literature upon which his book draws is overwhelmingly German. We know that Landschaft has a broader and less necessarily visual meaning in German than in English, and we know too (in part from Warnke’s own evidence here) how powerful and dangerous has been the political reading of landscape within the nationalist discourses of the German-speaking peoples. Undoubtedly, academic caution in handling the ideological dimensions of landscape art accounts in part for the situation Warnke identifies. But his claim must also rest in part","PeriodicalId":199648,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Reviews : Political landscape: the art history of nature. By Martin Warnke. London, Reaktion Books. 1994. 165 pp. £12.95, paper. ISBN 0 948462 63 9\",\"authors\":\"D. Cosgrove\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/147447409700400216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For an anglophone reader familiar with the extensive critical literature on landscape in English, the title of this book raises many expectations. Within art history and beyond, landscape painting and design have come to be regarded as deeply political, because landscape is regarded as a way of seeing and representing the natural world, historically bound to the exercise of authority and power over land and territory. It comes therefore as a surprise to read in the book’s preface that ’art experts ... have totally eliminated the political element from landscape painting’ and the hope that the book ’will show that political pointers need not impair our appreciation and perception of the landscape, but actually sharpen them’ (pp. 7-8). Such a claim only makes sense in the specific context of the original German text. Martin Warnke is Professor of Art History at the University of Hamburg, and the literature upon which his book draws is overwhelmingly German. We know that Landschaft has a broader and less necessarily visual meaning in German than in English, and we know too (in part from Warnke’s own evidence here) how powerful and dangerous has been the political reading of landscape within the nationalist discourses of the German-speaking peoples. Undoubtedly, academic caution in handling the ideological dimensions of landscape art accounts in part for the situation Warnke identifies. But his claim must also rest in part\",\"PeriodicalId\":199648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409700400216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409700400216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对于一个熟悉英语风景评论文学的英语读者来说,这本书的标题提出了许多期望。在艺术史和其他领域,风景画和设计被认为具有深刻的政治性,因为风景被认为是一种观察和表现自然世界的方式,历史上与对土地和领土的权威和权力的行使息息相关。因此,在这本书的序言中读到“艺术专家……完全消除了山水画中的政治因素”,并希望这本书“将表明,政治指针不必损害我们对风景的欣赏和感知,而是实际上使它们更加尖锐”(第7-8页)。这种说法只有在原始德文文本的特定背景下才有意义。马丁·沃恩克(Martin Warnke)是汉堡大学(University of Hamburg)艺术史教授,他的书所引用的文学作品绝大部分来自德国。我们知道,与英语相比,德语中的Landschaft具有更广泛的视觉意义,而且我们也知道(部分来自Warnke自己的证据),在德语民族主义话语中,对景观的政治解读是多么强大和危险。毫无疑问,在处理景观艺术的意识形态维度时,学术界的谨慎在一定程度上解释了沃恩克所发现的情况。但他的主张也必须有部分依据
Book Reviews : Political landscape: the art history of nature. By Martin Warnke. London, Reaktion Books. 1994. 165 pp. £12.95, paper. ISBN 0 948462 63 9
For an anglophone reader familiar with the extensive critical literature on landscape in English, the title of this book raises many expectations. Within art history and beyond, landscape painting and design have come to be regarded as deeply political, because landscape is regarded as a way of seeing and representing the natural world, historically bound to the exercise of authority and power over land and territory. It comes therefore as a surprise to read in the book’s preface that ’art experts ... have totally eliminated the political element from landscape painting’ and the hope that the book ’will show that political pointers need not impair our appreciation and perception of the landscape, but actually sharpen them’ (pp. 7-8). Such a claim only makes sense in the specific context of the original German text. Martin Warnke is Professor of Art History at the University of Hamburg, and the literature upon which his book draws is overwhelmingly German. We know that Landschaft has a broader and less necessarily visual meaning in German than in English, and we know too (in part from Warnke’s own evidence here) how powerful and dangerous has been the political reading of landscape within the nationalist discourses of the German-speaking peoples. Undoubtedly, academic caution in handling the ideological dimensions of landscape art accounts in part for the situation Warnke identifies. But his claim must also rest in part