同意作为处理个人资料的法律依据

Māris Bomiņš
{"title":"同意作为处理个人资料的法律依据","authors":"Māris Bomiņš","doi":"10.17770/acj.v3i84.3655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the principles encompassed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) were mostly welcomed, one of them, namely the consent, caused prolonged controversy among privacy scholars, human rights advocates and business world due to their pivotal impact on the way personal data would be handled under the new legal provisions and the drastic consequences of enforcing these new requirements in the era of big data and internet of things. In this work, we firstly review all controversies around the new stringent definitions of consent in reference to their implementation impact on privacy and personal data protection, and secondly, we evaluate existing legislation in terms of fulfilling the practicalities for the implementation and effective integration of the new requirements.For the reasons explained above, consent is far removed from an easy option under the GDPR. Greater specification around what is meant by consent has brought with it more detailed and onerous obligations. Additionally, sometimes may first wish to look closely at the other legal grounds available to establish whether there is an available alternative to the consent path. In addition, given the extensive lengths that a data controller now has to go to demonstrate a valid consent according new legislation, it is important to see what further steps may be needed to distinguish such a consent from one that is explicit. For this and other reasons, the arguments around what makes consent effective are unlikely to be put to bed by the GDPR and it remains a rough-edged concept to tackle.","PeriodicalId":190864,"journal":{"name":"Administrative and Criminal Justice","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONSENT AS A LEGAL BASIS FOR PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA\",\"authors\":\"Māris Bomiņš\",\"doi\":\"10.17770/acj.v3i84.3655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the principles encompassed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) were mostly welcomed, one of them, namely the consent, caused prolonged controversy among privacy scholars, human rights advocates and business world due to their pivotal impact on the way personal data would be handled under the new legal provisions and the drastic consequences of enforcing these new requirements in the era of big data and internet of things. In this work, we firstly review all controversies around the new stringent definitions of consent in reference to their implementation impact on privacy and personal data protection, and secondly, we evaluate existing legislation in terms of fulfilling the practicalities for the implementation and effective integration of the new requirements.For the reasons explained above, consent is far removed from an easy option under the GDPR. Greater specification around what is meant by consent has brought with it more detailed and onerous obligations. Additionally, sometimes may first wish to look closely at the other legal grounds available to establish whether there is an available alternative to the consent path. In addition, given the extensive lengths that a data controller now has to go to demonstrate a valid consent according new legislation, it is important to see what further steps may be needed to distinguish such a consent from one that is explicit. For this and other reasons, the arguments around what makes consent effective are unlikely to be put to bed by the GDPR and it remains a rough-edged concept to tackle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":190864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative and Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative and Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17770/acj.v3i84.3655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative and Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17770/acj.v3i84.3655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然《通用数据保护条例》(General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR)所包含的原则大多受到欢迎,但其中一项原则,即同意原则,在隐私学者、人权倡导者和商界引发了长期争议,因为它对新法律条款下个人数据的处理方式产生了关键影响,在大数据和物联网时代,执行这些新要求会带来严重后果。在这项工作中,我们首先回顾了围绕新的严格同意定义的所有争议,参考其实施对隐私和个人资料保护的影响,其次,我们评估了现行立法在实施和有效整合新要求方面的可行性。由于上述原因,在GDPR下,同意远非一个简单的选择。关于“同意”含义的更详细的说明带来了更详细和繁重的义务。此外,有时不妨首先仔细研究现有的其他法律依据,以确定是否有一种可替代同意途径的办法。此外,考虑到数据控制者现在必须根据新立法证明其有效同意的长度,重要的是要了解可能需要采取哪些进一步措施来区分这种同意和明确的同意。出于这个和其他原因,围绕什么使同意生效的争论不太可能被GDPR平息,它仍然是一个难以解决的粗糙概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONSENT AS A LEGAL BASIS FOR PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA
While the principles encompassed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) were mostly welcomed, one of them, namely the consent, caused prolonged controversy among privacy scholars, human rights advocates and business world due to their pivotal impact on the way personal data would be handled under the new legal provisions and the drastic consequences of enforcing these new requirements in the era of big data and internet of things. In this work, we firstly review all controversies around the new stringent definitions of consent in reference to their implementation impact on privacy and personal data protection, and secondly, we evaluate existing legislation in terms of fulfilling the practicalities for the implementation and effective integration of the new requirements.For the reasons explained above, consent is far removed from an easy option under the GDPR. Greater specification around what is meant by consent has brought with it more detailed and onerous obligations. Additionally, sometimes may first wish to look closely at the other legal grounds available to establish whether there is an available alternative to the consent path. In addition, given the extensive lengths that a data controller now has to go to demonstrate a valid consent according new legislation, it is important to see what further steps may be needed to distinguish such a consent from one that is explicit. For this and other reasons, the arguments around what makes consent effective are unlikely to be put to bed by the GDPR and it remains a rough-edged concept to tackle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信