软件密集型医疗器械安全评价:引入安全质量模型方法

R. Adler, S. Kemmann, D. D. M. C. Filho, José Augusto Oliveira Neto
{"title":"软件密集型医疗器械安全评价:引入安全质量模型方法","authors":"R. Adler, S. Kemmann, D. D. M. C. Filho, José Augusto Oliveira Neto","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argumentation-based safety assurance is a promising approach for the development of safe software-intensive medical devices. However, one challenge is safety assessment by an independent authority. This article presents an approach that enables argumentation-based safety development on the one hand, while providing means for assessing the product's safety afterwards on the other hand. We combine a generic safety case with an engineering model, which results in specific quality questions for assessors and provides a generic argumentation structure for manufacturers.","PeriodicalId":332420,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety assessment of software-intensive medical devices: Introducing a safety quality model approach\",\"authors\":\"R. Adler, S. Kemmann, D. D. M. C. Filho, José Augusto Oliveira Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Argumentation-based safety assurance is a promising approach for the development of safe software-intensive medical devices. However, one challenge is safety assessment by an independent authority. This article presents an approach that enables argumentation-based safety development on the one hand, while providing means for assessing the product's safety afterwards on the other hand. We combine a generic safety case with an engineering model, which results in specific quality questions for assessors and provides a generic argumentation structure for manufacturers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于论证的安全保证是开发安全的软件密集型医疗器械的一种很有前途的方法。然而,一个挑战是由一个独立的权威机构进行安全评估。本文提出了一种方法,一方面使基于论证的安全开发成为可能,另一方面提供了事后评估产品安全性的手段。我们将一个通用的安全案例与一个工程模型结合起来,为评估人员提供了具体的质量问题,并为制造商提供了一个通用的论证结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety assessment of software-intensive medical devices: Introducing a safety quality model approach
Argumentation-based safety assurance is a promising approach for the development of safe software-intensive medical devices. However, one challenge is safety assessment by an independent authority. This article presents an approach that enables argumentation-based safety development on the one hand, while providing means for assessing the product's safety afterwards on the other hand. We combine a generic safety case with an engineering model, which results in specific quality questions for assessors and provides a generic argumentation structure for manufacturers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信