改变评论

C. Prichard, O. Alakavuklar
{"title":"改变评论","authors":"C. Prichard, O. Alakavuklar","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794219.013.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Who benefits from management ideas and practices? Whose authority do they promote? What kind of truths do they produce and to what effect? Such are the fundamental questions of a critical study of management ideas. In this chapter the authors offer a brief introduction to four of the main traditions (Marxism, post-modernism, feminism, and postcolonialism) that make up this complex field and then, drawing on Lacan’s four discourses framework, they question such critical knowledge itself. In particular they highlight how the conditions that have produced this form of management research have led to a number of unintended consequences, particularly a loss of relevance to praxis. In response, they suggest a new opening for the critique of management ideas by illustrating an activist-scholar project.","PeriodicalId":254439,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing the Critique\",\"authors\":\"C. Prichard, O. Alakavuklar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794219.013.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Who benefits from management ideas and practices? Whose authority do they promote? What kind of truths do they produce and to what effect? Such are the fundamental questions of a critical study of management ideas. In this chapter the authors offer a brief introduction to four of the main traditions (Marxism, post-modernism, feminism, and postcolonialism) that make up this complex field and then, drawing on Lacan’s four discourses framework, they question such critical knowledge itself. In particular they highlight how the conditions that have produced this form of management research have led to a number of unintended consequences, particularly a loss of relevance to praxis. In response, they suggest a new opening for the critique of management ideas by illustrating an activist-scholar project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794219.013.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794219.013.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

谁从管理理念和实践中受益?他们提倡谁的权威?它们产生了什么样的真理,产生了什么样的效果?这些都是对管理思想进行批判性研究的基本问题。在本章中,作者简要介绍了构成这个复杂领域的四个主要传统(马克思主义,后现代主义,女权主义和后殖民主义),然后,借鉴拉康的四个话语框架,他们质疑这些批判性知识本身。他们特别强调了产生这种形式的管理研究的条件如何导致了一些意想不到的后果,特别是与实践的相关性的丧失。作为回应,他们通过阐述一个活动家-学者项目,为管理思想的批判提出了一个新的开端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing the Critique
Who benefits from management ideas and practices? Whose authority do they promote? What kind of truths do they produce and to what effect? Such are the fundamental questions of a critical study of management ideas. In this chapter the authors offer a brief introduction to four of the main traditions (Marxism, post-modernism, feminism, and postcolonialism) that make up this complex field and then, drawing on Lacan’s four discourses framework, they question such critical knowledge itself. In particular they highlight how the conditions that have produced this form of management research have led to a number of unintended consequences, particularly a loss of relevance to praxis. In response, they suggest a new opening for the critique of management ideas by illustrating an activist-scholar project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信