{"title":"欧洲波罗的海省爱沙尼亚淡水和咸淡水中动物沙门的分类组成","authors":"Külli Lokko, T. Virro, J. Kotta","doi":"10.3176/ECO.2014.4.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Zoopsammon is a diverse group of organisms living in the interstitial spaces between sand grains at the shoreline. The term psammon is nowadays mainly used to characterize freshwater sandy beach habitats, although it was originally defined as 'a transitional zone between aquatic and soil habitats' (Schmid-Araya, 1998), and is also applicable to brackish and marine beach habitats, where the intertidal zone can be considered as psammon habitat if the sediment consists of sand and is regularly exposed (e.g. Tzschaschel, 1983; Golemansky, 1998; De Smet and Chernyshev, 2006; Alekperov et al., 2007). However, in the marine literature psammic comunities are more often referred to as meiofauna. Psammon communities have received very little attention compared to lower littoral and sublittoral meiobenthos, and psammon has been rarely treated as a single entity. Despite its unstable and very fluctuating environment, the arenal zone hosts a large variety of species (Pejler, 1995; Golemansky, 1998; Gheskiere et al., 2005). Protists, nematodes, rotifers, small crustaceans, tardigrades, gastrotrichs, turbellarians, oligochaetes, and insect larvae are regularly found from psammon habitats (Thane-Fenchel, 1968; Whitman and Clark, 1984; Schmid-Araya, 1998, Kotwicki et al., 2005a, 2005b). From psammic taxa, rotifers have received relatively much attention in freshwater habitats (e.g. Pejler, 1995; Bielariska-Grajner, 2001; Segers and Chittapun, 2001). In marine beach habitats, nematodes tend to be the most thoroughly researched psammic taxa (e.g. Gheskiere et al., 2004, 2005; Liu et al., 2008; Maria et al., 2012, 2013). From the Baltic Sea area some information is available on psammic ciliates (Czapik and Fyda, 1992), testate amoebae (Golemansky, 1998), rotifers (Thane-Fenchel, 1968; Sorensen, 2001), and nematodes (Gheskiere et al., 2005). In Europe, freshwater zoopsammon has received more attention in Poland (e.g. Bielariska-Grajner, 2001; Ejsmont-Karabin, 2003; Nesteruk, 2007; Kalinowska, 2008, 2013; Bielaiska-Grajner and Poznaiska, 2010). At the Estonian water bodies, the coastal zone was sampled already in the 19th century. In these studies, some beach invertebrates were recorded (Eichwald, 1849, 1852; Levander, 1894). However, it is not known where exactly the samples were taken (water or sediment, at waterline/beach or deeper water). First true reports on the interstitial fauna, i.e. zoopsammon, of sandy beach in Estonia date from the 1980s. In these sampling campaigns, Golemansky (1983) investigated psammic testate amoebae from the Estonian coast of the Gulf of Finland, and Kutikova and Haberman (1986) determined the taxonomic composition of rotifers from the arenal zone of Lake Vortsjarv. Recently, some information has been provided about the taxonomic composition and density of zoopsammon communities, their temporal and spatial distribution, and relation with various environmental variables in some Estonian coastal beaches (Lokko et al., 2014) and in two lakes (Lokko et al., 2013; Lokko and Virro, 2014). The aim of this study is to provide an overview and sum up the current knowledge on the taxonomic structure of zoopsammon in Estonian waters. This summarized information serves as a basis of the current status of psammic communities both in freshwater and marine habitats and potentially allows assessing the current status and conservation value of Estonian interstitial beach habitats. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study is based on two previous studies (Lokko et al., 2013, 2014) and an additional sampling campaign carried out in 2011-2014. Samples were taken from three sandy beaches along the Estonian coast of the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea, and from four lakes across Estonia (Fig. 1). The coastal sampling sites were located at Keibu Bay near Nova village (Nova Beach, the westernmost sampling site), at Pirita Beach within Tallinn City, and at a popular beach of Narva Bay adjacent to a small town of Narva-Joesuu (the easternmost site). …","PeriodicalId":262667,"journal":{"name":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxonomic composition of zoopsammon in fresh and brackish waters of Estonia, a Baltic province ecoregion of Europe\",\"authors\":\"Külli Lokko, T. Virro, J. Kotta\",\"doi\":\"10.3176/ECO.2014.4.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION Zoopsammon is a diverse group of organisms living in the interstitial spaces between sand grains at the shoreline. The term psammon is nowadays mainly used to characterize freshwater sandy beach habitats, although it was originally defined as 'a transitional zone between aquatic and soil habitats' (Schmid-Araya, 1998), and is also applicable to brackish and marine beach habitats, where the intertidal zone can be considered as psammon habitat if the sediment consists of sand and is regularly exposed (e.g. Tzschaschel, 1983; Golemansky, 1998; De Smet and Chernyshev, 2006; Alekperov et al., 2007). However, in the marine literature psammic comunities are more often referred to as meiofauna. Psammon communities have received very little attention compared to lower littoral and sublittoral meiobenthos, and psammon has been rarely treated as a single entity. Despite its unstable and very fluctuating environment, the arenal zone hosts a large variety of species (Pejler, 1995; Golemansky, 1998; Gheskiere et al., 2005). Protists, nematodes, rotifers, small crustaceans, tardigrades, gastrotrichs, turbellarians, oligochaetes, and insect larvae are regularly found from psammon habitats (Thane-Fenchel, 1968; Whitman and Clark, 1984; Schmid-Araya, 1998, Kotwicki et al., 2005a, 2005b). From psammic taxa, rotifers have received relatively much attention in freshwater habitats (e.g. Pejler, 1995; Bielariska-Grajner, 2001; Segers and Chittapun, 2001). In marine beach habitats, nematodes tend to be the most thoroughly researched psammic taxa (e.g. Gheskiere et al., 2004, 2005; Liu et al., 2008; Maria et al., 2012, 2013). From the Baltic Sea area some information is available on psammic ciliates (Czapik and Fyda, 1992), testate amoebae (Golemansky, 1998), rotifers (Thane-Fenchel, 1968; Sorensen, 2001), and nematodes (Gheskiere et al., 2005). In Europe, freshwater zoopsammon has received more attention in Poland (e.g. Bielariska-Grajner, 2001; Ejsmont-Karabin, 2003; Nesteruk, 2007; Kalinowska, 2008, 2013; Bielaiska-Grajner and Poznaiska, 2010). At the Estonian water bodies, the coastal zone was sampled already in the 19th century. In these studies, some beach invertebrates were recorded (Eichwald, 1849, 1852; Levander, 1894). However, it is not known where exactly the samples were taken (water or sediment, at waterline/beach or deeper water). First true reports on the interstitial fauna, i.e. zoopsammon, of sandy beach in Estonia date from the 1980s. In these sampling campaigns, Golemansky (1983) investigated psammic testate amoebae from the Estonian coast of the Gulf of Finland, and Kutikova and Haberman (1986) determined the taxonomic composition of rotifers from the arenal zone of Lake Vortsjarv. Recently, some information has been provided about the taxonomic composition and density of zoopsammon communities, their temporal and spatial distribution, and relation with various environmental variables in some Estonian coastal beaches (Lokko et al., 2014) and in two lakes (Lokko et al., 2013; Lokko and Virro, 2014). The aim of this study is to provide an overview and sum up the current knowledge on the taxonomic structure of zoopsammon in Estonian waters. This summarized information serves as a basis of the current status of psammic communities both in freshwater and marine habitats and potentially allows assessing the current status and conservation value of Estonian interstitial beach habitats. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study is based on two previous studies (Lokko et al., 2013, 2014) and an additional sampling campaign carried out in 2011-2014. Samples were taken from three sandy beaches along the Estonian coast of the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea, and from four lakes across Estonia (Fig. 1). The coastal sampling sites were located at Keibu Bay near Nova village (Nova Beach, the westernmost sampling site), at Pirita Beach within Tallinn City, and at a popular beach of Narva Bay adjacent to a small town of Narva-Joesuu (the easternmost site). …\",\"PeriodicalId\":262667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estonian Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estonian Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3176/ECO.2014.4.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/ECO.2014.4.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
Zoopsammon是一种生活在海岸线沙粒间隙的多种生物。沙石一词现在主要用于描述淡水沙滩栖息地,尽管它最初被定义为“水生和土壤栖息地之间的过渡地带”(Schmid-Araya, 1998),也适用于咸淡水和海洋海滩栖息地,其中潮间带可以被认为是沙石栖息地,如果沉积物由沙子组成并且经常暴露(例如Tzschaschel, 1983;Golemansky, 1998;De Smet and Chernyshev, 2006;Alekperov et al., 2007)。然而,在海洋文献中,寄生物群落通常被称为小型动物群。与较低的滨海和滨海下底栖生物相比,沙石群落受到的关注很少,而且沙石很少被视为一个单一的实体。尽管其不稳定和非常波动的环境,竞技场区拥有大量的物种(Pejler, 1995;Golemansky, 1998;Gheskiere et al., 2005)。原生生物、线虫、轮虫、小甲壳类动物、缓步动物、胃虫、湍流虫、寡毛纲动物和昆虫幼虫经常在沙门栖息地被发现(Thane-Fenchel, 1968;惠特曼和克拉克,1984;Schmid-Araya, 1998; Kotwicki et ., 2005a, 2005b)。轮虫在淡水生境中受到了相对较多的关注(例如Pejler, 1995;Bielariska-Grajner, 2001;Segers and Chittapun, 2001)。在海洋海滩生境中,线虫往往是研究最彻底的类群(例如Gheskiere et al., 2004,2005;Liu et al., 2008;Maria et al., 2012, 2013)。从波罗的海地区可以得到一些关于蚤类纤毛虫(Czapik和Fyda, 1992年)、变形虫(Golemansky, 1998年)、轮虫(Thane-Fenchel, 1968年;Sorensen, 2001)和线虫(Gheskiere et al., 2005)。在欧洲,淡水动物沙门在波兰得到了更多的关注(例如Bielariska-Grajner, 2001;Ejsmont-Karabin, 2003;Nesteruk, 2007;Kalinowska, 2008,2013;Bielaiska-Grajner and Poznaiska, 2010)。在爱沙尼亚的水体中,沿海地区早在19世纪就已经取样了。在这些研究中,记录了一些海滩无脊椎动物(Eichwald, 1849, 1852;Levander, 1894)。然而,目前尚不清楚样本的确切地点(水或沉积物,在水线/海滩或更深的水域)。关于爱沙尼亚沙滩间质动物群(即动物沙猴)的第一次真实报道始于20世纪80年代。在这些取样活动中,Golemansky(1983)调查了芬兰湾爱沙尼亚海岸的sammic testate变形虫,Kutikova和Haberman(1986)确定了沃尔茨贾夫湖(Lake Vortsjarv)水场带轮虫的分类组成。最近,在爱沙尼亚的一些沿海海滩(Lokko et al., 2014)和两个湖泊(Lokko et al., 2013)中,关于动物沙门群落的分类组成和密度、时空分布以及与各种环境变量的关系的一些信息得到了提供;Lokko和Virro, 2014)。本研究的目的是提供概述和总结在爱沙尼亚水域动物沙门的分类结构目前的知识。这些摘要资料可作为了解淡水和海洋生境中sammic群落现状的基础,并有可能评估爱沙尼亚间隙滩头生境的现状和养护价值。材料和方法本研究基于之前的两项研究(Lokko等人,2013年,2014年)和2011-2014年进行的额外抽样活动。样本取自芬兰湾沿岸、波罗的海沿岸的三个沙滩,以及爱沙尼亚境内的四个湖泊(图1)。沿海采样点位于Nova村附近的Keibu湾(Nova Beach,最西端采样点)、塔林市的Pirita海滩,以及Narva- joesuu小镇附近的Narva湾一个受欢迎的海滩(最东端采样点)。…
Taxonomic composition of zoopsammon in fresh and brackish waters of Estonia, a Baltic province ecoregion of Europe
INTRODUCTION Zoopsammon is a diverse group of organisms living in the interstitial spaces between sand grains at the shoreline. The term psammon is nowadays mainly used to characterize freshwater sandy beach habitats, although it was originally defined as 'a transitional zone between aquatic and soil habitats' (Schmid-Araya, 1998), and is also applicable to brackish and marine beach habitats, where the intertidal zone can be considered as psammon habitat if the sediment consists of sand and is regularly exposed (e.g. Tzschaschel, 1983; Golemansky, 1998; De Smet and Chernyshev, 2006; Alekperov et al., 2007). However, in the marine literature psammic comunities are more often referred to as meiofauna. Psammon communities have received very little attention compared to lower littoral and sublittoral meiobenthos, and psammon has been rarely treated as a single entity. Despite its unstable and very fluctuating environment, the arenal zone hosts a large variety of species (Pejler, 1995; Golemansky, 1998; Gheskiere et al., 2005). Protists, nematodes, rotifers, small crustaceans, tardigrades, gastrotrichs, turbellarians, oligochaetes, and insect larvae are regularly found from psammon habitats (Thane-Fenchel, 1968; Whitman and Clark, 1984; Schmid-Araya, 1998, Kotwicki et al., 2005a, 2005b). From psammic taxa, rotifers have received relatively much attention in freshwater habitats (e.g. Pejler, 1995; Bielariska-Grajner, 2001; Segers and Chittapun, 2001). In marine beach habitats, nematodes tend to be the most thoroughly researched psammic taxa (e.g. Gheskiere et al., 2004, 2005; Liu et al., 2008; Maria et al., 2012, 2013). From the Baltic Sea area some information is available on psammic ciliates (Czapik and Fyda, 1992), testate amoebae (Golemansky, 1998), rotifers (Thane-Fenchel, 1968; Sorensen, 2001), and nematodes (Gheskiere et al., 2005). In Europe, freshwater zoopsammon has received more attention in Poland (e.g. Bielariska-Grajner, 2001; Ejsmont-Karabin, 2003; Nesteruk, 2007; Kalinowska, 2008, 2013; Bielaiska-Grajner and Poznaiska, 2010). At the Estonian water bodies, the coastal zone was sampled already in the 19th century. In these studies, some beach invertebrates were recorded (Eichwald, 1849, 1852; Levander, 1894). However, it is not known where exactly the samples were taken (water or sediment, at waterline/beach or deeper water). First true reports on the interstitial fauna, i.e. zoopsammon, of sandy beach in Estonia date from the 1980s. In these sampling campaigns, Golemansky (1983) investigated psammic testate amoebae from the Estonian coast of the Gulf of Finland, and Kutikova and Haberman (1986) determined the taxonomic composition of rotifers from the arenal zone of Lake Vortsjarv. Recently, some information has been provided about the taxonomic composition and density of zoopsammon communities, their temporal and spatial distribution, and relation with various environmental variables in some Estonian coastal beaches (Lokko et al., 2014) and in two lakes (Lokko et al., 2013; Lokko and Virro, 2014). The aim of this study is to provide an overview and sum up the current knowledge on the taxonomic structure of zoopsammon in Estonian waters. This summarized information serves as a basis of the current status of psammic communities both in freshwater and marine habitats and potentially allows assessing the current status and conservation value of Estonian interstitial beach habitats. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study is based on two previous studies (Lokko et al., 2013, 2014) and an additional sampling campaign carried out in 2011-2014. Samples were taken from three sandy beaches along the Estonian coast of the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea, and from four lakes across Estonia (Fig. 1). The coastal sampling sites were located at Keibu Bay near Nova village (Nova Beach, the westernmost sampling site), at Pirita Beach within Tallinn City, and at a popular beach of Narva Bay adjacent to a small town of Narva-Joesuu (the easternmost site). …