灰色大卡车

Jelena Subotić
{"title":"灰色大卡车","authors":"Jelena Subotić","doi":"10.7591/9781501742415-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This introductory chapter discusses a certain type of Holocaust remembrance called “memory appropriation.” It shows how this appropriated memory of the Holocaust has become a form of “screen memory” that filters out and obfuscates any serious addressing of one's own responsibility for mass atrocity in more recent wars, but also clouds the memories that do not fit the current political moment. This remembrance of the Holocaust, then, is not exactly denial, nor is it quite the same as trivialization. As such, the chapter suggests that memory appropriation would be a more nuanced way of understanding this type of Holocaust remembrance. Here, the memory of the Holocaust is used to memorialize a different kind of suffering, such as suffering under communism, or suffering from ethnic violence perpetrated by other groups. It is Holocaust remembrance turned inward, away from the actual victims of the Holocaust or the Holocaust itself.","PeriodicalId":382806,"journal":{"name":"Yellow Star, Red Star","volume":"441 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Big Gray Truck\",\"authors\":\"Jelena Subotić\",\"doi\":\"10.7591/9781501742415-004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This introductory chapter discusses a certain type of Holocaust remembrance called “memory appropriation.” It shows how this appropriated memory of the Holocaust has become a form of “screen memory” that filters out and obfuscates any serious addressing of one's own responsibility for mass atrocity in more recent wars, but also clouds the memories that do not fit the current political moment. This remembrance of the Holocaust, then, is not exactly denial, nor is it quite the same as trivialization. As such, the chapter suggests that memory appropriation would be a more nuanced way of understanding this type of Holocaust remembrance. Here, the memory of the Holocaust is used to memorialize a different kind of suffering, such as suffering under communism, or suffering from ethnic violence perpetrated by other groups. It is Holocaust remembrance turned inward, away from the actual victims of the Holocaust or the Holocaust itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yellow Star, Red Star\",\"volume\":\"441 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yellow Star, Red Star\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501742415-004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yellow Star, Red Star","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501742415-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本导论章讨论了一种被称为“记忆挪用”的大屠杀纪念。它展示了这种被挪用的大屠杀记忆如何成为一种“屏幕记忆”,它过滤掉并模糊了人们对近期战争中大规模暴行的责任的任何严肃处理,但也遮蔽了不适合当前政治时刻的记忆。因此,这种对大屠杀的记忆并不是完全否认,也不完全等同于轻视。因此,本章表明,记忆挪用将是理解这类大屠杀纪念的一种更微妙的方式。在这里,对大屠杀的记忆被用来纪念另一种痛苦,例如在共产主义统治下遭受的痛苦,或遭受其他群体犯下的种族暴力的痛苦。它是向内的大屠杀纪念,远离大屠杀的实际受害者或大屠杀本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Big Gray Truck
This introductory chapter discusses a certain type of Holocaust remembrance called “memory appropriation.” It shows how this appropriated memory of the Holocaust has become a form of “screen memory” that filters out and obfuscates any serious addressing of one's own responsibility for mass atrocity in more recent wars, but also clouds the memories that do not fit the current political moment. This remembrance of the Holocaust, then, is not exactly denial, nor is it quite the same as trivialization. As such, the chapter suggests that memory appropriation would be a more nuanced way of understanding this type of Holocaust remembrance. Here, the memory of the Holocaust is used to memorialize a different kind of suffering, such as suffering under communism, or suffering from ethnic violence perpetrated by other groups. It is Holocaust remembrance turned inward, away from the actual victims of the Holocaust or the Holocaust itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信