{"title":"国际反腐败法的起源","authors":"Cecily Rose","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192845702.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cecily Rose uses the failed negotiation of an agreement about illicit payments in the UN in the 1970s to throw light on how the international legal definition of corruption became constricted to a narrow focus on bribery even though developing states were seeking a broader instrument that included ethical standards for transnational corporations to control rampant corporate corruption and political interference in developing states.","PeriodicalId":244643,"journal":{"name":"Histories of Transnational Criminal Law","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Origins of International Anti-Corruption Law\",\"authors\":\"Cecily Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192845702.003.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cecily Rose uses the failed negotiation of an agreement about illicit payments in the UN in the 1970s to throw light on how the international legal definition of corruption became constricted to a narrow focus on bribery even though developing states were seeking a broader instrument that included ethical standards for transnational corporations to control rampant corporate corruption and political interference in developing states.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Histories of Transnational Criminal Law\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Histories of Transnational Criminal Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845702.003.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histories of Transnational Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845702.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cecily Rose uses the failed negotiation of an agreement about illicit payments in the UN in the 1970s to throw light on how the international legal definition of corruption became constricted to a narrow focus on bribery even though developing states were seeking a broader instrument that included ethical standards for transnational corporations to control rampant corporate corruption and political interference in developing states.