HOA vs.租赁权

F. Deng
{"title":"HOA vs.租赁权","authors":"F. Deng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2888704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HOA (homeowners association) and leasehold (such as shopping mall) are two important types of urban institutions that have been developing very fast worldwide. This paper extends Hart-Moore model on cooperative vs. outside ownership to the urban setting by incorporating a distinctive feature of urban land use: the transaction and consumption of land is bundled with that of collective goods. The focus is placed on the ex post pricing efficiency of providing collective goods. The impacts of endogenous outside market and the capitalization of collective goods into land price are also discussed. Findings suggest that HOAs are likely to be located in more competitive market such as the suburbs. Rich communities may prefer HOA while leasehold is more common for poor communities. Leasehold also becomes more efficient when the capitalization effect is weaker.","PeriodicalId":410291,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Analytical Models (Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HOA vs. Leasehold\",\"authors\":\"F. Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2888704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"HOA (homeowners association) and leasehold (such as shopping mall) are two important types of urban institutions that have been developing very fast worldwide. This paper extends Hart-Moore model on cooperative vs. outside ownership to the urban setting by incorporating a distinctive feature of urban land use: the transaction and consumption of land is bundled with that of collective goods. The focus is placed on the ex post pricing efficiency of providing collective goods. The impacts of endogenous outside market and the capitalization of collective goods into land price are also discussed. Findings suggest that HOAs are likely to be located in more competitive market such as the suburbs. Rich communities may prefer HOA while leasehold is more common for poor communities. Leasehold also becomes more efficient when the capitalization effect is weaker.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Analytical Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Analytical Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2888704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Analytical Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2888704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

HOA(业主协会)和租赁(如购物中心)是世界范围内发展非常迅速的两种重要的城市机构类型。通过纳入城市土地使用的一个显著特征:土地的交易和消费与集体物品的交易和消费捆绑在一起,本文将合作所有权与外部所有权的哈特-摩尔模型扩展到城市环境。重点放在提供集体商品的事后定价效率上。本文还讨论了内源性外部市场和集体物品资本化对土地价格的影响。研究结果表明,hoa可能位于竞争更激烈的市场,如郊区。富裕社区可能更喜欢HOA,而租赁在贫困社区更常见。资本化效应越弱,租赁效率越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HOA vs. Leasehold
HOA (homeowners association) and leasehold (such as shopping mall) are two important types of urban institutions that have been developing very fast worldwide. This paper extends Hart-Moore model on cooperative vs. outside ownership to the urban setting by incorporating a distinctive feature of urban land use: the transaction and consumption of land is bundled with that of collective goods. The focus is placed on the ex post pricing efficiency of providing collective goods. The impacts of endogenous outside market and the capitalization of collective goods into land price are also discussed. Findings suggest that HOAs are likely to be located in more competitive market such as the suburbs. Rich communities may prefer HOA while leasehold is more common for poor communities. Leasehold also becomes more efficient when the capitalization effect is weaker.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信