医学委员会:日益增长的虚拟护理的影响和提高质量和安全的综合方法的需要

Amar Gupta, J. Halamka, Lauren Park, Naomi Kim, Veda Donthireddy, Mariam Dogar, Dinesh Patel
{"title":"医学委员会:日益增长的虚拟护理的影响和提高质量和安全的综合方法的需要","authors":"Amar Gupta, J. Halamka, Lauren Park, Naomi Kim, Veda Donthireddy, Mariam Dogar, Dinesh Patel","doi":"10.30953/tmt.v7.363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increased amount of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the challenge of providing appropriate medical board oversight to ensure proper quality of care delivery and safety of patients. This is partly due to the conventional model of each state medical board (SMB) holding responsibility for medical standards and oversight only within the jurisdiction of that state board and partly due to regulatory waivers and reduced enforcement of privacy policies. Even with a revoked license in one state, significant number of physicians have continued to practice by obtaining a medical license in a different state. Individualized requests were sent to 63 medical boards with questions related to practice of telemedicine and digital health by debarred or penalized medical doctors. The responses revealed major deficiencies and the urgent need to adopt a nationwide framework and to create an anchor point to serve as the coordinator of all relevant information related to incidents of improper medical practice. The ability to cause damage to large number of patients is significantly more now. Federal and state agencies urgently need to provide more attention and funding to issues related to quality of care and patient care in the changing ecosystem that includes medical specialists at a distance and the use of evolving digital health services and products. The creation, maintenance, and use of an integrated information system at national and multinational levels is increasingly important.","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Boards: Impact of Growing Virtual Care and Need for Integrated Approach to Enhance Quality and Safety\",\"authors\":\"Amar Gupta, J. Halamka, Lauren Park, Naomi Kim, Veda Donthireddy, Mariam Dogar, Dinesh Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.30953/tmt.v7.363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increased amount of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the challenge of providing appropriate medical board oversight to ensure proper quality of care delivery and safety of patients. This is partly due to the conventional model of each state medical board (SMB) holding responsibility for medical standards and oversight only within the jurisdiction of that state board and partly due to regulatory waivers and reduced enforcement of privacy policies. Even with a revoked license in one state, significant number of physicians have continued to practice by obtaining a medical license in a different state. Individualized requests were sent to 63 medical boards with questions related to practice of telemedicine and digital health by debarred or penalized medical doctors. The responses revealed major deficiencies and the urgent need to adopt a nationwide framework and to create an anchor point to serve as the coordinator of all relevant information related to incidents of improper medical practice. The ability to cause damage to large number of patients is significantly more now. Federal and state agencies urgently need to provide more attention and funding to issues related to quality of care and patient care in the changing ecosystem that includes medical specialists at a distance and the use of evolving digital health services and products. The creation, maintenance, and use of an integrated information system at national and multinational levels is increasingly important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telehealth and Medicine Today\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telehealth and Medicine Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v7.363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v7.363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,虚拟医疗数量的增加加剧了提供适当医疗委员会监督以确保适当的医疗服务质量和患者安全的挑战。这部分是由于各州医疗委员会的传统模式,即每个州医疗委员会只对其管辖范围内的医疗标准和监督负责,部分是由于监管豁免和隐私政策的执行减少。即使在一个州被吊销执照,仍有相当数量的医生通过在另一个州获得医疗执照继续执业。向63个医疗委员会发送了个性化请求,其中涉及被取消行医资格或受到处罚的医生从事远程医疗和数字保健的问题。这些答复表明存在重大缺陷,迫切需要通过一个全国性框架,并设立一个联络点,作为与不当医疗行为事件有关的所有相关信息的协调者。现在对大量患者造成伤害的能力明显增强了。联邦和州机构迫切需要在不断变化的生态系统中提供更多关注和资金,以解决与护理质量和患者护理相关的问题,包括远程医疗专家和不断发展的数字医疗服务和产品的使用。在国家和多国一级建立、维持和使用综合信息系统日益重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical Boards: Impact of Growing Virtual Care and Need for Integrated Approach to Enhance Quality and Safety
The increased amount of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the challenge of providing appropriate medical board oversight to ensure proper quality of care delivery and safety of patients. This is partly due to the conventional model of each state medical board (SMB) holding responsibility for medical standards and oversight only within the jurisdiction of that state board and partly due to regulatory waivers and reduced enforcement of privacy policies. Even with a revoked license in one state, significant number of physicians have continued to practice by obtaining a medical license in a different state. Individualized requests were sent to 63 medical boards with questions related to practice of telemedicine and digital health by debarred or penalized medical doctors. The responses revealed major deficiencies and the urgent need to adopt a nationwide framework and to create an anchor point to serve as the coordinator of all relevant information related to incidents of improper medical practice. The ability to cause damage to large number of patients is significantly more now. Federal and state agencies urgently need to provide more attention and funding to issues related to quality of care and patient care in the changing ecosystem that includes medical specialists at a distance and the use of evolving digital health services and products. The creation, maintenance, and use of an integrated information system at national and multinational levels is increasingly important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信